INTEGRATING METACOGNITIVE SKILLS AND CONNECTIVIST PRINCIPLES IN OPEN AND DISTANCE EDUCATION

Georgia Konstantia Karagianni

Abstract


Metacognition, the awareness and control of one's own cognitive processes and mental functions, is an absolutely essential skill for students who are engaging in Open and Distance Education (ODE). In particular, in ODE environments, the need for self-regulation and autonomy is of utmost importance. On top of that, with the arrival of connectivism, a modern learning theory that focuses on the vital role that networks and technology play in the knowledge construction process, there emerges a fresh and new horizon. This helps to promote and support metacognitive development, specifically within ODEs. This article discusses the intersections between metacognition and connectivism, putting into light how digital tools, networked communities, and artificial intelligence might support learners in planning, monitoring, and evaluating their learning. This study will use empirical evidence and theoretical insights to propose strategies for integrating metacognitive practices with the principles of connectivism to enhance learning outcomes in ODE.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


metacognition, connectivism, open and distance learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, K., Iqbal, W., El-Hassan, A., Qadir, J., Benhaddou, D., Ayyash, M., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2023). Data-driven artificial intelligence in education: A comprehensive review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10247566

AlDahdouh, A., Osorio, A., & Caires, S. (2015). Understanding knowledge network, learning and connectivism. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(10). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572896.pdf

Alam, A. (2023). Connectivism learning theory and connectivist approach in teaching and learning: A review of literature. Bhartiyam International Journal of Education & Research, 12(2). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369734538_Connectivism_Learning_Theory_and_Connectivist_Approach_in_Teaching_and_Learning_A_Review_of_Literature

Almatrafi, O., & Johri, A. (2018). Systematic review of discussion forums in massive open online courses (MOOCs). IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(3), 413–428. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8418792

Alvarez, R. P., Jivet, I., Pérez-Sanagustin, M., Scheffel, M., & Verbert, K. (2022). Tools designed to support self-regulated learning in online learning environments: A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 15(4), 508–522. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9852014

Amiti, F. (2020). Synchronous and asynchronous E-learning. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 5(2). Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning

Banihashem, S. K., & Aliabadi, K. (2017). Connectivism: Implications for distance education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 8(3). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ijvlms.10030

Brainard, R. E., Shaffer, A. L., Watson, L. J., Terson de Paleville, D. G., & Falcone, J. C. (2024). Play your way to an “A”: Helping students engage during the social isolation of remote learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 48(4), 720–725. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00052.2024

Buckley, P., & Doyle, E. (2016). Gamification and student motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1162–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.964263

Bueno, P. M., & Rodas, R. S. (2021). Distance learning and metacognitive awareness: A positive relationship? In ICERI2021 Proceedings (pp. 7775–7780). IATED. Retrieved from https://library.iated.org/download/MORALESBUENO2021DIS

Carter Jr, R. A., Rice, M., Yang, S., & Jackson, H. A. (2020). Self-regulated learning in online learning environments: Strategies for remote learning. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 321–329. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ils-04-2020-0114/full/html

Castro, G. P. B., Chiappe, A., Rodríguez, D. F. B., & Sepulveda, F. G. (2024). Harnessing AI for Education 4.0: Drivers of personalized learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 22(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.5.3467

Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Quix, C. (2010). Connectivism: The network metaphor of learning. International Journal of Learning Technology, 5(1), 80–99. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2010.031617

Cho, Y. (2022). Effects of AI-based personalized adaptive learning systems in higher education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 26(4), 249–263. Retrieved from https://archives.kdischool.ac.kr/handle/11125/43743

de Andrés Martínez, C. (2012). Developing metacognition at a distance: Sharing students’ learning strategies on a reflective blog. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(2), 199– 212. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ954849

de Freitas, S., Gibson, D., Alvarez, V., Irving, L., Star, K., Charleer, S., & Verbert, K. (2017, April). How to use gamified dashboards and learning analytics for providing immediate student feedback and performance tracking in higher education. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (pp. 429–434). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054175

Feroz, H. M. B., Zulfiqar, S., Noor, S., & Huo, C. (2022). Examining multiple engagements and their impact on students' knowledge acquisition: The moderating role of information overload. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(1), 366–393. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1335443

Ferreira da Rocha, F. D., Lemos, B., Henrique de Brito, P., Santos, R., Rodrigues, L., Isotani, S., & Dermeval, D. (2024). Gamification and open learner model: An experimental study on the effects on self-regulatory learning characteristics. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3525–3546. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-023-11906-2

Filcher, C., & Miller, G. (2000). Learning strategies for distance education students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 41(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2000.01060

Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20–30. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312182813_The_Challenges_of_Online_Learning_Supporting_and_Engaging_the_Isolated_Learner

Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064–1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661

Gu, J. (2021). Family conditions and the accessibility of online education: The digital divide and mediating factors. Sustainability, 13(15), 8590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158590

Gueta, M. F., & Janer, S. S. (2021). Distance learning challenges on the use of self-learning modules. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 2(7), 58–71. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371123410_Distance_Learning_Challenges_on_the_Use_of_Self-_Learning_Module

Gunaratne, C., Baral, N., Rand, W., Garibay, I., Jayalath, C., & Senevirathna, C. (2020). The effects of information overload on online conversation dynamics. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 26, 255–276. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10588-020-09314-9

Hendricks, G. P. (2019). Connectivism as a learning theory and its relation to open distance education. Progressio, 41(1), 1–13. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/4773

Herlo, D. (2017). Connectivism, a new learning theory? European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.05.02.41

Jeny, D. P. (2024). Classrooms to networks: Applying connectivism principles in pedagogy. Journal of Pedagogy, 1(5), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.62872/0ypqjy52

Jin, S. H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I., & Seo, K. (2023). Supporting students’ self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 37. Retrieved from https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-023-00406-5

Johnson, G., & Davies, S. (2014). Self-regulated learning in digital environments: Theory, research, praxis. British Journal of Research, 1(2), 1–14. Retrieved from https://www.primescholars.com/articles/selfregulated-learning-in-digital-environments-theory-research-praxis.pdf

Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2022). Learning analytics intervention improves students’ engagement in online learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 449– 460. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10758-021-09547-w

Karagianni, G. K. (2024). Metacognition as a catalyst for improved learning outcomes in open & distance education. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 9(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v9i1.5567

Kiv, A., Soloviev, V., Tarasova, E., Koycheva, T., & Kolesnykova, K. (2020). Semantic knowledge networks in education. In E3S Web of Conferences, 166, 10022. EDP Sciences. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016610022

Kuiper, R. (2002). Enhancing metacognition through the reflective use of self-regulated learning strategies. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 33(2), 78–87. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-20020301-11

Lin, X. F., Hwang, G. J., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., Li, W., Liu, J., & Liang, Z. M. (2023). Effects of a contextualized reflective mechanism-based augmented reality learning model on students’ scientific inquiry learning performances, behavioral patterns, and higher-order thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6931–6951. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2057546

Mair, C. (2012). Helping students succeed through using reflective practice to enhance metacognition and create realistic predictions. Psychology Teaching Review, 18(2), 42–46. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ991407.pdf

Mattar, J. (2018). Constructivism and connectivism in education technology: Active, situated, authentic, experiential, and anchored learning. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(2). Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3314/331455826012/html/

Melezhik, K., Petrenko, A., & Khrabskova, D. (2021). Reflective hyperconnectivity of social networks’ virtual space as a factor in the design of distant learning environments. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia 29(10):46-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-10-46-55

Melissa Ng Lee Yen, A. (2020). The influence of self-regulation processes on metacognition in a virtual learning environment. Educational Studies, 46(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1516628

Mukhlis, H., Haenilah, E. Y., Maulina, D., & Nursafitri, L. (2024). Connectivism and digital age education: Insights, challenges, and future directions. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2024.45.3.11

Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-based personalized e-learning systems: Issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323–81342. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9840390

Na, K. S., & Tasir, Z. (2017, April). A systematic review of learning analytics intervention contributing to student success in online learning. In 2017 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE) (pp. 62–68). IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2017.18

Neroni, J., Meijs, C., Gijselaers, H. J., Kirschner, P. A., & de Groot, R. H. (2019). Learning strategies and academic performance in distance education. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.007

Nguyen, Q., Tempelaar, D., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2016). What learning analytics-based prediction models tell us about feedback preferences of students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(3), 13–33. Retrieved from https://oro.open.ac.uk/47700/1/QRDE_SI_Second_Draft_Revised_Nguyen-Tempelaar-Rientes-Giesbers-LearningAnalyticsStdntFback.pdf

Nyysti, K., & Walters, K. (2018). Out of isolation: Building online higher education engagement. In Fostering Effective Student Communication in Online Graduate Courses (pp. 179–192). IGI Global. Retrieved from https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/out-of-isolation/187820

Oliveira, W., Hamari, J., Joaquim, S., Toda, A. M., Palomino, P. T., Vassileva, J., & Isotani, S. (2022). The effects of personalized gamification on students’ flow experience, motivation, and enjoyment. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 16. Retrieved from https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-022-00194-x

Pérez-Álvarez, R., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., & Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (2018). Tools to support self-regulated learning in online environments: Literature review. In Lifelong Technology Enhanced Learning: 13th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2018, Leeds, UK, September 3–5, 2018, Proceedings (pp. 16–30). Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_2

Ravenscroft, A. (2011). Dialogue and connectivism: A new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 139–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.934

Romanova, N. V., Sabirova, Z. E., & Sidorova, O. V. (2020, November). Digitalization of higher education in the context of information inequality. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1691(1), 012099. IOP Publishing. Retrieved from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012099

Staubitz, T., Pfeiffer, T., Renz, J., Willems, C., & Meinel, C. (2015). Collaborative learning in a MOOC environment. In ICERI2015 Proceedings (pp. 8237–8246). IATED. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295903511_Collaborative_Learning_in_a_MOOC_Environment

Van Campenhout, R. (2020). Supporting metacognitive learning strategies through an adaptive application. In Adaptive Instructional Systems: Second International Conference, AIS 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings 22 (pp. 218–227). Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_16

Van De Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100

Zumbach, J., von Kotzebue, L., & Pirklbauer, C. (2022). Does augmented reality also augment knowledge acquisition? Augmented reality compared to reading in learning about the human digestive system. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(5), 1325–1346. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211062945

Zhu, M., & Bonk, C. J. (2019). Designing MOOCs to facilitate participant self-monitoring for self-directed learning. Online Learning, 23(4), 106–134. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2037




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v10i1.5774

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2016-2026. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).