METADISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF AN ONLINE ENTERTAINMENT ARTICLE

Afiqah Humaira Anuarsham, Noor Hanim Rahmat, Muhammad Adib Nazhan Khamsah

Abstract


In language structure, discourse is generally used by writers in their text to get readers to understand and comprehend the content of the written text. Metadiscourse is a specific class of language device used by writers to organize their text as well as manage the interactions or relations in some way with the reader of the text. By taking Hyland (2005) and Lakoff’s (1975) interactional metadiscourse model, this paper employs the data analysis driven method called document analysis to analyse the presence of interactional metadiscourse elements in an online entertainment article. Coding and frequency counting method are adopted to find out the sub-categories of respective four elements: Intensifiers, Hedges, Boosters, and Engagement Markers. The elements are interpreted as representing writers’ strategies to define the relationship between themselves, the reader and the topic. Consequently, it is found that the four elements of interactional metadiscourse are all deployed in the article text. The result of this study identifies that engagement markers is the most frequent interactional metadiscourse used by the author. This research may suggest entertainment online article employ the integration of interactional metadiscourse as effectively as other genre of online articles. It may be of value in understanding entertainment online genre for the development of the metadiscourse framework academically.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


metadiscourse, interactional resources, online article, writing style

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amiryousefi, M., & Eslami Rasekh, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Definitions, Issues and Its Implications for English Teachers. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 159–167. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47807497_Metadiscourse_Definitions_Issues_and_Its_Implications_for_English_Teachers. doi:10.5539/elt.v3n4p159.

Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J., & Martaeu, T. (1997). The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study. Sociology, 31(3), 597-606. Retrieved from https://https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0038038597031003015. doi: 10.1177/0038038597031003015.

Biri, Y. (2017). Metadiscourse in Online Opinion Texts-Exploring Variation within a genre. MA Thesis, Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/132491131.pdf.

Hyland, K. (2005). Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices, Linguistics and Education, 16(4), 363–377. Retrieved from https://https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589806000404?via%3Dihub. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2006.05.002.

Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of

Pragmatics, 113, 16-29. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216616306245?via%3 Dihub. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007.

Lakoff, T. R. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45-80. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/class/linguist156/Lakoff_1973.pdf.

Major, C. H., & Savin-Baden, M. (2010). An introduction to qualitative research synthesis: Managing the information explosion in social science research. New York: Routledge.

Mohamed, A. F. B., & Rashid, R. B. A. (2017). The Metadiscourse Markers in Good Undergraduate Writers’ Essays Corpus. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(6), 213–220. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320351583_The_Metadiscourse_Markers_in_Good_Undergraduate_Writers'_Essays_Corpus. doi: 10.5539/ijel.v7n6p213

Nordquist, R. (2018, February 17). Definition and Examples of Online Writing. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-online-writing-1691358.

O'Connor, H. & Gibson, N. (2003). A Step-By-Step Guide to Qualitative Data

Analysis. Pimatiziwin A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community

Health,1(1), 63-90. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292432218_A_Step-By-Step_Guide_To_Qualitative_Data_Analysis.

Olsson, L. (2000). A study of gender-related differences in introductory letters. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Lulea Tekniska Universitet. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d73f/f3c620d0c49f943606f97610d9643a4f64e2.pdf.

Pascual, D. (2018). Analysing digital communication: Discursive features, rhetorical

structure and the use of English as a lingua franca in travel blog posts. Journal of English Studies, 6, 255-279. Retrieved from https://zaguan.unizar.es/record/77140/files/texto_completo.pdf. doi: 16. 10.18172/jes.3556.

Sardabi, N., & Afghari, A. (2015). Gender differences in the use of intensifiers. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(7), 203-213. Retrieved from http://jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/174.

Tajeddin, Z. & Alemi, M. (2012). L2 Learners’ Use of Metadiscourse Markers in

Online Discussion Forums. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 1(1), 93-121.

Retrieved from http://ilt.atu.ac.ir/pdf_116_99d46e550f0e24fd572de0f41b563079.html.

Tariq, H., & Zia, M. W. (2014). Use of Electronic Information Resources by Students of Faculty of Science, University of Karachi. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 4(3), 80–91. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266376609_use_of_electronic_information_resources_by_students_of_faculty_of_science_university_of_karachi.

Zujic, B. (2020, January). Advantages and Disadvantages of Netflix. Retrieved from https://www.technobezz.com/advantages-disadvantages-netflix/.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v3i1.187

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2602 - 0254 / ISSN-L 2602 - 0254). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.