THE ROLE OF VISUAL LEARNING AIDS ACROSS DIVERSE LEARNING STYLES IN HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION

Lhoussine Qasserras

Abstract


The current research delves into the impact of incorporating visual learning tools into high school programs, specifically examining the differences in outcomes among students who identify as visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learners. Rooted in Mayer's dual coding, cognitive load theory, and Baddeley's working memory model, this study assesses the effectiveness of visual aids in improving learning for various learning styles. Using a qualitative approach, data was gathered from a thorough literature review and multiple academic studies. The results indicate that visual aids enhance engagement, comprehension, and critical thinking in students with different learning styles and support educators in developing inclusive teaching methods. The recommendations include proactive integration of visual displays in teaching practices, administrative support, and policy initiatives to secure funding and set standards, underscoring the importance of visual multimedia in the classroom.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


Visual Aids, Learning Styles, High Schools, Engagement, Teaching Practices

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Edumaspul - Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394

Aisami, R. S. (2015). Learning Styles and Visual Literacy for Learning and Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.508

Avni, B. (2023, August 30). Primary school pupils’ responses to lessons that combine different teaching styles (Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing and Kinaesthetic) according to their own personal learning styles. Figshare. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10779/aru.23757990.v1

Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359

Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students’ Learning from Text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013176309260

Cavite, J., & Gonzaga, M. (2023). Pupils’ Learning Styles and Academic Performance in Modular Learning. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation, 1(3), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8325677

Clark, R. C., Lyons, C., & Hoover, L. (2004). Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials. Performance Improvement, 43(10), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140431011

Coleman, J. M., McTigue, E. M., & Smolkin, L. B. (2011). Elementary Teachers’ Use of Graphical Representations in Science Teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 613–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9204-1

Dexter, D. D., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Graphic Organizers and Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871103400104

Kolvoord, R., Puffenbarger, R., McGhee, R., Miller, R., Overway, K., Phillips, K., Ryan, L., Sowers, J., & Brown, J. (2017). Bridging the Valley: Recruiting and Retaining STEM Majors. Journal of STEM Education, 17(4). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/174407/

Manchishi, P. C. (2024). Evolution of methods and techniques in foreign language teaching. Retrieved from https://dspace.unza.zm/server/api/core/bitstreams/c4e97b50-9463-484c-a2a4-427d19c527c6/content

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.ma/books?hl=en&lr=&id=SSLdo1MLIywC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Mayer&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Mayer&f=false

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3801_6

Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003413

Olofsson, Å., Taube, K., & Ahl, A. (2015). Academic Achievement of University Students with Dyslexia. Dyslexia, 21(4), 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1517

Pallapu, P. (2007). Effects of Visual and Verbal Learning Styles on Learning. Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1. Retrieved from https://www.auburn.edu/academic/cla/ilsrj/Journal%20Volumes/Fall%202007%20Vol%201%20PDFs/Visual%20Verbal%20Learning%20Styles.pdf

Pateşan, M., Balagiu, A., & Alibec, C. (2018). Visual Aids in Language Education. International Conference Knowledge-Based Organization, 24(2), 356–361. https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2018-0115

Qasserras, L., & Qasserras, M. (2023b). Gardner’s Theory’s Impact on English Language Teaching: A Constructive Analysis. European Modern Studies Journal, 7(1), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.7(1).2023.31

Raiyn, J. (2016). The role of visual learning in improving students’ high-order thinking skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 115. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1112894.pdf

Sam D, P., & Rajan, P. (2013). Using Graphic Organizers to Improve Reading Comprehension Skills for the Middle School ESL Students. English Language Teaching, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p155

Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511816819.003

Syofyan, R., & Siwi, M. K. (2018). The Impact of Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic Learning Styles on Economics Education Teaching. Proceedings of the First Padang International Conference on Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship (PICEEBA 2018), 57. https://doi.org/10.2991/piceeba- 18.2018.17




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v7i2.550

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2018-2023. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2602 - 0254 / ISSN-L 2602 - 0254). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.