INTERACTION IN OPRAH SHOW: A SOCIO-PRAGMATIC STUDY

Mayada Muhammad Abdul Rahman, Nawal Fadhil Abbas

Abstract


The aim of this study is to examine the management of interaction in The Oprah Winfrey Show by exploring the turn taking techniques and mechanisms used by the participants in this show. It is an international American talk show, which provides some sort of naturally occurring conversation. As such, the researchers intend to analyze the turn taking system used from a socio-pragmatic perspective. The Sequential Production Model by Sacks, Schegloff, and Jefferson (1974) in combination with a work done by Duncan (1972) concerning turn taking mechanisms will be used as the theoretical framework in the present study. Moreover, the study takes into account the effect of the socio-pragmatic variables, namely, age and gender on the use of turn taking. The study concludes that gazing plays a crucial role in selecting the next speaker and there are gender and age differences concerning the frequency and type of violations that occur while taking turns at talk. The study can be of value to those interested in studying the organization of talk in interaction. Moreover, it is of help to TV talk show hosts who want to develop their interactional competence by making use of the way Oprah anchors her show.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


interaction management, turn taking, talk shows, gender, age

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas, N. F, & Al- Bahrani, R. H. (2015). The search for identity in online chat. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(2): 8-15.

Abdelrahim, N. (2006). Turn-taking Behaviour and Gender Differences in Speech: A Case Study of a Group of Educated Sudanese. Retrieved from http://khartoumspace.uofk.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/11448/Turn- Taking%20Behavior%20and%20Gender%20Differences%20In%20Speech%20A%20Case%20Study%20Of%20A%20Group%20Of%20Educated%20Sudanese.pdf?sequence=1.

Bahar, S. A. & Abbas, N. F. (2016). Overlap of meaning: Praise and flattery in Austen's Pride and Prejudice. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3(2): 310-324.

Beattie, G. W. (1981). Interruption in Conversational Interaction, and its Relation to the Sex and Status of the Interactants. Linguistics, 19: 15-35.

Casillas, M. (2014). Turn Taking. In M. Danielle (Ed.), Pragmatic Development First Language Acquisition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins, pp 53-70.

Coates, J. (2013). Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language (3rd ed.). London and New York, Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group.

Coulthard, M. (1985). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis (2nd ed). London, Longman Group.

Garcia, A. C.(2013). An Introduction to Interaction: Understanding Talk in Formal and Informal Settings. London, Bloomsbury.

Ghilzai, Sh. A. (2015). Conversational Analysis of Turn taking Behavior and Gender Differences in Multimodal Conversation. Retrieved from http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/WEzNGU4N/ shazia1.pdf

Gregori Signes, C. 2000. A Genre Based Approach to Daytime Talk on Television. SELL monographs 1. València, Universitat de València.

Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginnings. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3-4): 272-302.

Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, Academic Press.

Duncan, J. (1972). Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2): 283-292.

Haag, L. (1993). Oprah Winfrey: The Construction of Intimacy in the Talk Show Setting. Journal of Popular Culture, 26: 115-121. Retrieved from http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~jpiliavi/965/oprah.pdf

Ilie, C. (2001). Semi-institutional Discourse: the Case of Talk Shows. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 209-254.

Jie, W. & Miaomiao, Ch. (2016). Turn-Control Strategies in TV Talk Show. Canadian Social Science 12(5): 68-73.

Kendon, A. ( 1967). Some Functions of Gaze-Direction in Social Interaction. Acta Psychologica 26: 22-63.

Lerner, G. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The Context-sensitive Operation of Context free organization. Journal of Language and Society, 32: 177-201.

Liddicoat, J. (2007). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. New York, Continuum.

Lie et al. (2005). Interruption and Involvement in Discourse: Can Intercultural Interlocutors be Trained? Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 34(4): 233-254.

Novick, D., B., Hansen, & Ward, K (1996). Coordinating turn taking with gaze. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 96), Philadelphia, PA.

Olutayo, O. G. (2013). Determinants of turn-taking in Nigerian television talk shows. World Journal of English Language 3 (3): 67-77. Retrieved from http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/336

Oyeley, A. L. & Olutayo, O.G. (2012). Interaction management in Nigerian television talk shows. International Journal of English Linguistics 2(1): 149-161. Canadian Center of Science and Education. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n1p149.

Rui, K. & Ting, S. (2014). An analysis of Conversation Structure in Ellen Show. Studies in Literature and Language, 9(2): 37-42.

Sacks, H., Schgloff, E.A., and Jefferson, G (1973). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation. Language, 50: 696- 735.

Selting, M. (2000). The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society, 29: 477-517.

Smith, K. (2003). Bush and Core on Oprah Winfrey, or 'Operahfication' of American Presidential Candidates. Retrieved from http://www.politico.com/pdf/PPM41_oprahfication.pdf

Steensig, J. (2011). Turn Taking in Conversation. In K. Aijmer, and G. Anderson, (Eds), Handbooks of Pragmatics: Pragmatics of Society. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp 537-567.

Stenström, A. (2011). Pauses and Hesitations. In K. Ajmer, and G. Anderson, (Eds.). Handbooks of Pragmatics: Pragmatics of Society. Berlin, DEU, Walter de Gruyere, pp 502-535.

Tanak, H. (1999). Turn Taking in Japanese Conversation: A study in Grammar and Interaction. John Benjamin B.V.

Wilson, T. P., J. M. Wiemann, & D. H. Zimmerman (1984). Models of Turn Taking in Conversational Interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3(3): 159-183.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Mayada Muhammad Abdul Rahman, Nawal Fadhil Abbas

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.