DELIVERY, LANGUAGE USE AND TOPIC DEVELOPMENT IN SPEAKING OF EFL STUDENTS

Ariel E. San Jose, Jerome R. Vicencio

Abstract


Learning speaking beyond the adolescent period can be compared hiking in a treacherous mountain. This mixed method research was conducted to uncover the speaking abilities particularly in the aspects of delivery, language use, topic development and phonetic challenges. Using the Integrated Speaking Rubrics, Extent of Use of First Language, and interviews, the researchers found that all aspects were poor. Moreover, several language challenges were identified. Thorough discussions were provided in the results, discussions and conclusions. 

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


delivery, language use, topic development, speaking skills, EFL students, Gulf College

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Hosni, S. (2014). Speaking difficulties encountered by young EFL learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 2(6), 22-30.

Al-Saidat, E. M. (2010). Phonological analysis of English phonotactics: A case study of Arab learners of English. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3, 121-134.

Barkhuizen, G. P. (1998). Discovering learners' perceptions of ESL classroom teaching/learning activities in a South African context. TESOL quarterly, 32(1), 85-108.

Benrabah, M. (1997). Word-stress–a source of unintelligibility in English. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 35(3), 157-166.

Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: An example of a critical approach. Tesol Quarterly, 30(4), 723-738.

Brooks, N. (1960). Language and language learning. New York. Harcourt; Brace and World.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistics

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014, September). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. In Oncology nursing forum (Vol. 41, No. 5).

Casey, D., & Murphy, K. (2009). Issues in using methodological triangulation in research. Nurse Researcher, 16(4), 40–55. doi:10.7748/nr2009.07.16.4.40.c7160

Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1965). Some controversial questions in phonological theory. Journal of linguistics, 1(2), 97-138.

Cobb, A. K., & Forbes, S. (2002). Qualitative research: what does it have to offer to the gerontologist?. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 57(4), M197-M202.

Cope, D. G. (2014, January). Methods and meanings: credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. In Oncology nursing forum (Vol. 41, No. 1).

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner's errors. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1-4), 161-170.

Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing from five traditions. (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1974). Errors and strategies in child second language acquisition. TESOL quarterly, 129-136.

Eckman, F. R., Elreyes, A., & Iverson, G. K. (2003). Some principles of second language phonology. Second Language Research, 19(3), 169-208.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in second language acquisition, 26(1), 1-34.

Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R”. Neuropsychologia, 9(3), 317-323.

Houghton, C., Casey, D., Shaw, D., & Murphy, K. (2013). Rigour in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Researcher, 20(4), 12–17.

Hymes, D. (1979). On communicative competence. The communicative approach to language teaching

Integrated Speaking Rubrics (2014). Educational testing service. Available Online at "https://www.ets.org/s/toefl/pdf/toefl_speaking_rubrics.pdf"

Johnson, M., O’Hara, R., Hirst, E., Weyman, A., Turner, J., Mason, S., ... & Siriwardena, A. N. (2017). Multiple triangulation and collaborative research using qualitative methods to explore decision making in pre-hospital emergency care. BMC medical research methodology, 17(1), 11.

Khan, I. A. (2011). Learning difficulties in English: Diagnosis and pedagogy in Saudi Arabia. Educational Research, 2(7), 1248-1257.

Koch, T. (2006). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 91–100.

Koch, T., & Harrington, A. (1998). Reconceptualising rigour: The case for reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 882–890.

Krashen, S. D. (1973). Lateralization, language learning, and the critical period: Some new evidence. Language learning, 23(1), 63-74.

Krashen, S., & Pon, P. (1975). An error analysis of an advanced ESL learner: The importance of the Monitor. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 7, 125-129.

Krashen, S. D., Long, M. A., & Scarcella, R. C. (1979). Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL quarterly, 573-582.

Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59-67.

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Mahmoud, A. (2005). Collocation errors made by Arab learners of English. Asian EFL journal, 5(2), 117-126.

Mantzoukas, S. (2005). The inclusion of bias in reflective and reflexive research: A necessary prerequisite for securing validity. Journal of Research in Nursing, 10, 279– 295. doi:10.1177/174498710501000305

Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ, 311, 109.

Patterson, W. and Ambrosini, V. (2015), “Configuring absorptive capacity as a key process for research-intensive firms”, Technovation, Vol. 36 No. 37, pp. 77-89.

Pederson, A.E., Hack, T.F., McClemont, S.E., & Taylor-Brown, J. (2013). An exploration of the patient navigator role: Perspectives of younger women with breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41, 77–88. doi:10.1188/14.ONF.77-88

Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

Rabab’ah, G. (2013). Strategies of repair in EFL learners’ oral discourse. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 123.

Ryan-Nicholls, K.D., & Will, C.I. (2009). Rigour in qualitative research: Mechanisms for control. Nurse Researcher, 16(3), 70–85.

Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27–37.

San Jose, A. E. (2011). Dialectal variations in english: Its effect on speaking proficiency. UIC Research Journal. Vol. 17 No. 1.

San Jose, A. E. (2012). Linguistic Experiences of Adult Dyslexic Learners. UIC Research Journal, 18(1), 1-1.

San Jose, A. E., Vicencio, J. V. (2016). Organization, style, and mechanics in writing of efl students. International Journal of Education Research for Higher Education (CHED Accredited Journal) Volume 22 No. 1

Sawahel, W. (2015). Arab countries last in global test of english proficiency. Available at https://www.al-fanarmedia.org/ Retrieved October 29, 2017.

Shabbir, B. & Bughio, M. (2013). Factors Affecting the Language Learning Process among Saudi Students. International Research Journal of Arts & Humanities, 37, 75-81.

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63-75.

Shepard, R. N., & Cooper. L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tahaineh, Y. (2010) "Arab EFL University Students' Errors in the Use of Prepositions". MJAL2:1JANUARY2010. ISSN 0974-8741. Retrieved on 15 December 2017 from: http://www.mjal.org/ HYPERLINK EFL University Students' Errors in the Use of Prepositions

Tobin, G.A., & Begley, C.M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 388–396.

Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Research method knowledge base.[Online] Available: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/qualval.php [October 2, 2017].

Vishnevsky, T., & Beanlands, H. (2004). Qualitative research. Nephrology Nursing, 31, 234–238.

Waters, A. (1996). A review of research into needs in English for academic purposes of relevance to the North American higher education context. Educational Testing Service.

Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological review, 20(2), 158.

Wei, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2002). Insights into English Pronunciation Problems of Thai Students.

Whittemore, R., Chase, S.K., & Mandle, C.L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 522–537. doi:10.1177/104973201129119299


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Ariel E. San Jose, Jerome R. Vicencio

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.