IMAGE-SCHEMATIC STRUCTURING OF REALITY IN POLITICAL SPEECHES ON THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK

Ljerka Jeftić

Abstract


The paper is concerned with analysis of Donald Trump and Angela Merkel’s speeches to their respective nations on the occasion of the COVID-19 outbreak. Within the integrated cognitive-critical approach to discourse analysis framework the paper focuses on the interplay between the cognitive mechanisms and discursive structures that make up meanings in a genre of political discourse. Assuming that specific actions and measures are to be communicated so as to deal with the threat presented by the coronavirus, analysis of the cognitive dimension of language use focuses on the underlying force (linguistically articulated by way of modal verbs) and containment image schemas considered as indicative of the ways the speakers conceive of the power vested in them. The political dimension analysis focuses on pronominal forms as discourse structures establishing relationships with addressees. The results point to D. Trump’s self-representation of the protector of nation unlike A. Merkel’s encouragement of solidarity empowered by knowledge-based joint actions and behaviour.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


discourse; cognition; embodiment of mind, image schema; modal verbs

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altheide D I, 2009. Terror Post 9/11 and the Media, New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

Chilton P, Schaffner C, 1997. Discourse and Politics. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction 2: 206-230.

Chilton P, 2004. Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Chilton P, 2017. Toward a Neuro-Cognitive Model of Socio-Political Discourse, and an Application to the Populist Discourse of Donald Trump. Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme 2: 237-249.

Fairclough N, 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman Group Limited.

Fowler R, 1996. On Critical Linguistics. Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis: 3-15. London and New York: Routledge

Hart C, 2005. Analyzing Political Discourse: Toward a Cognitive Approach. Critical Discourse Studies 2 (2): 189-194.

Hart C, 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.

Johnson M, 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff G, Johnson M, 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff G, Johnson M, 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff G, 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Chelsea: Green Publishing Company.

Quirk R, Greenbaum S, 1987 A University Grammar of English. Longman Group UK Limited.

Sweetser E, 1982. Root and Epistemic Modals: Causality in Two Worlds. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 484-507.

Van Dijk TA, Kintsch W, 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

Van Dijk TA, 1989. Structures of Discourse and Structures of Power. Communication Yearbook 12: 18-59. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Van Dijk TA, 1997. What is Political Discourse Analysis. Political Linguistics: 11-52.

Wodak R, 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington DC: SAGE.

Wodak R, 2001. What CDA Is About: A Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Developments. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis: 1-14. SAGE.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v4i3.223

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Ljerka Jeftić

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.