Fahad Ayedh Alqahtani


Performance in grammar of English as a foreign language (EFL) is an essential part of successful communication. And communicative teaching of grammar is essential to the eventual mastery of EFL. The most effective grammar teaching can be achieved through output enhancement to teach language that both communicative and interactive. There are many techniques to teach grammar effectively in the context of the communicative and interactive language classroom. Participants in the study were first-year secondary school students during the first semester of the academic year 1438-1439 H. The researcher employed a teaching strategy based on output enhancement to teach grammar in meaningful and communicative contexts. The results show that the proposed teaching strategy proved to be effective in improving the students' performance in grammar. In addition, providing students with carefully-timed combinations of repetition and elicitation is very effective in helping them develop their learning of grammar. EFL instructors are recommended to integrate appropriate combinations of output enhancement techniques to teach grammar to their students.



Article visualizations:

Hit counter



grammar teaching, output enhancement, recasts, elicitation

Full Text:



Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Eds.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

Al-Majed, H. (1996). An analysis of grammatical and associated errors found in the writing of third grade Saudi male students in four high schools in the city of Riyadh. MA thesis, University of Hull., accessed on 12th January, 2013.

Al-Musharaf, A. (2008) Teaching and assessing grammar in English primary stage classrooms that promote communicative language. Unpublished MA thesis, Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University.

Al-Naeem, L. (2007). Teaching grammar via the inductive approach: A quantitative-qualitative study conducted in an EFL setting, MA thesis, Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University., accessed on 4th November, 2012.

Benati, A. (2017). The Role of Input and Output Tasks in Grammar Instruction: Theoretical, Empirical and Pedagogical Considerations. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 377-396.

Brown, J. (1996). Testing in Language Programs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Carroll, S. & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15 (30), 357-386.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

DeKeyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 17(4), 379-410.

DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive Perspectives on Learning and Practicing Second Language Grammar. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (1998). "Communicative Focus on Form." In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus-on-Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press

Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA Review, 19(1), 18-41.

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning. 51(2), 281-318.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368.

Fu, T., & Nassaji, H. (2016). Corrective feedback, learner uptake, and feedback perception in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom. SSLLT, 6(1), 159-181.

Hulstijn, J. H. & Schmidt, R. W. (1994). Guest editors’ introduction. In J. H. Hulstijn & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), AILA Review: Consciousness and second language learning: Conceptual, methodological and practical issues in language learning and teaching, 11, 5–10.

Izumi, S. & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 2(34), 239–273.

Jacobs, J. (2005). Combining Dictogloss and Cooperative Learning to Promote Language Learning. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal. 3(1), 1-15.

Jimenez, J. (2006). Corrective feedback in EFL university classrooms: A case

study at an Italian university. Linguistica e Filologia, 23, 45-89.

Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing?: A think aloud protocol analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Technical Report #9, pp. 183-216). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

Kamiya, N. (2015). The effectiveness of intensive and extensive recasts on L2 acquisition for implicit and explicit knowledge. Linguistics and Education, 29, 59-72.

Koprowski, M. (2000). The Power of Strategic Competence and the Need for a Focus on Form., accessed on 23rd October, 2012.

Kubota, M. (1995). The Garden Path technique: Is it Really Effective? Working Papers of Chofu Gakuen Women's Junior College, 27(1), 21-48.

Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EURO SLA Yearbook. 5(1), 223-251.

Leeman, J., Arteagoitia, I. , Fridman, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating attention to form with meaning: Focus on form in content-based Spanish instruction. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 217-258). University of Hawai'i at Manoa: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15(2), 205-224.

Lightbown, P. (1993). Input, instruction and feedback in second language acquisition. Second Language Research. 7(1), 32-53.

Loewen, S. (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning. 54(1), 153-188

Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 19(1), 37–66

Lyster, R. (2002). Negotiation in immersion teacher-student interaction. International Journal of Educational Research. 37(3), 237-253.

Mousavi, K., Alavinia, P., & Gholami, J. Input Providing vs. Output-Prompting Negotiation Strategies in Learning Grammar among Young EFL Learners. International Journal of Instruction, 11 (2), 497-512.

Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning. 50(4), 617-673.

Nitko, A. J. (2001). Educational Assessment of Students, 3rd edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an

adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573-595.

Poole, A. (2005). Focus on form instruction: foundations, applications, and criticisms. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal. 5(1), 47-56.

Rassaei, E., Moinzadeh, A., & Youhanaee, M. (2012). The effect of corrective feedback on the acquisition of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 59-75.

Rosalia, C. (1999). Error Correction in SLA Classrooms: The use of recasts., accessed on 12th June, 2012.

Rust, J. & Golombok, S. (1989). Modern psychometrics: the science of psychological assessment. London: Routledge.

Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(4), 357–385.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Eds.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: a collection of empirical studies (pp. 301-322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Suzuki, M. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in adult ESL classrooms.

Working papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 4, 1-21. Retrieved from

White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A prototypical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated Attention to Form. Language Learning. 49(4), 583-625.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Fahad Ayedh Alqahtani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.