Tochukwu Matthew Oguegbe, Stephen Ebuka Iloke, Jerome Ogochukwu Ezisi, Enyeobi Bede Ofoma


The study investigated social support and locus of control as predictors of work life balance among workers. One hundred and forty one (141) workers from Stine Rice Industry, Amichi served as participants in the study, comprising 90 males (66.08%) and 51 females (33.92%). Their age ranged between 18 – 50 years with a mean age of 30.04 years and standard deviation of 8.1 years. The participants were selected using systematic and convenient sampling technique. Fisher's work life balance Scale (Fisher, 2001), Rotter internal-external locus of control scale 1966 (Rotter, 1966), and multidimensional scale of perceived social support (Zimet, Dahlem, Zimet & Farley, 1988) was used for data collection. The design adopted in the research is a correlational design. Based on this, Multiple Linear Regression was adopted as the statistical tool for data analysis using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS). Three hypotheses were tested, and the results revealed that the first hypothesis which stated that social support would significantly predict work life balance among workers was accepted at (p>.05, t=2.161). The second hypothesis which stated that locus of control would significantly predict work life balance among workers was also accepted at (p>.05, t=-6.02). The third hypothesis which stated that social support and locus of control would jointly predict work life balance among workers was accepted at F(2,138)=24.214, p<.05 level of significant. Thus, based on the findings of this study, the researchers recommended that organizations should provide mechanisms that will provide support for workers in order to balance their work lives, should provide human resource initiatives that will enhance their productivity level. Also, the needs of employees are increasing owing to the many roles they play outside the work and family environment; managers are to be understanding when employees make requests to meet these needs. Limitations and implications of the study were also discussed.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


social support, locus of control, work-family balance

Full Text:



Anazonwu, C. O. (1995). Locus of control, academic self-concept and attribution of responsibility for performance in statistics. Psychological Report, 77,367-370.

April, S., Dharani, B. T., & Peters, R. V. (2012). Locus of control in personality, Morristown, N.J: General Learning Press.

Beham, D. W. (2011). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.

Brough, P. & Frame, S. (2004). Impact of social support: Theoretical and Empirical Advancements, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 581–585.

Brough, S. Holt E. J, Bauld, A. W., & Ryan, S. (2008). Work-family conflict: A model of linkages between work and family domain variables and turnover intentions. Journal of Managerial Issues, XV, 175-190.

Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 687–732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Carison, C. S., Grzywaez, J. E. & Zivnuska, R. (2009). Work life balance and limitations. The Journal of Indian Psychology, 3:(4).

Cheng, D. S., Chung, P. L., Chio, A. I., & Chan, S. C. (2013). Work locus of control in the Stressor-Strain Relationship: An examination of work-family conflicts; Journal of Management, 25(4): 513-540.

Dijkstra, P. C., Beersma, C. C., & Evans, R. M. (2016). Impact of locus of control on Work Life Balance among Academic Staff of University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 7(1), 54- 59.

Fisher, G. A., Bulger, P. S. & Smith C. A. (2009). Work/personal life balance: The psychology of optimal experience, European Journal of work and organizational psychology, 8(3),155-178.

Graen, L. & Scandura, C. (1997). The Effects of Working Time on Productivity and Firm Performance. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal,13,1-13.

Hayman, J. R. (2005). Exploring the linkages between perceived usability of flexible work schedules and work/life balance, Community, Work and Family, Flexible Work Arrangements, 12 (3), 327-338.

Hill, S., Batinuik, A. R., Dobos, A. G. & Rouner, C. (1983). Combined social support: A new attempt to conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.

Hung, A. C., & Hsu, P. A. (2011). Conflict and facilitation between internal and external locus of control, Realizing the outcomes for organizations. New Zealand Journal of psychology, 35(3),69-76.

Kamau, P. V., Milleke, D. A., Makaya, T. R., & Wagoki, R. A. (2013). Impact of Work Life Balance on Performance of Employees in the Organizations, Global Journal of Business Management, 40-41.

Korsgaard, M. & Meglino, F., Lester A. C., & Jeong, D. (2017). The influence of support relationships on balanced life: Differentiating emotional from instrumental support, Equal Opportunities International, 23 (2): 78-96.

Leavy, C. S. (1983). Resilience and perceived social support: models and linkages. Journal of Social Issues, 54(2), 245-266.

Liddicoat, E. A. (2003). A review of work life balance research in Australia and New Zealand, Asia Pacific journal of Human resources, 46(3), 316-333.

Mehmet. G. & Harun, C. (2011). Relationship between locus of control and perception of role ambiguity on work life balance, A Research Thesis.

Michel, J. S., Greenfield, L. M., Absolom, J. K., & Eiser, B. (2011). Locus of control : A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior 32, 689-725.

Ning, G. M., Jian, C. T., & Crant, A. E. (2014). An investigation of factors affecting work life balance in non-governmental organizations (NGOs): A case of Management Sciences for Health (MSH); United States International University.

Nnadozie, E., & Steven, K. (2015). Contributions of psychological detachment from work and perceived organizational support in work life balance among health workers among employee, Social psychology.11(2),9-15.

Nordenamark, J. C., Vinberg, C. M., & Strand A. A. (2012). Control and demands at work, work life balance and perceived social support: Psychometric Theory Series in Psychology. 32(3), 341-356.

Onyeishi, I. E., & Okongwu, O. E. (2013). Personality and social support as predictors of life satisfaction of Nigerian prisons officers, The social Sciences, 8:5-12.

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external locus of control. Psychological Monographs, 80(5), 312-329.

Sneha, F. C. & Paryani, E. C. (2014). Joint effects of social support, life satisfaction and stress on work life balance. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, 9(15), 448-470.

Uwom, O. E., & Osinowo, O. (2016). Impact of locus of control and job type on the perception of autopsy among medical and non-medical workers, Journal of forensic Sciences, 3(12),136-140.

Visser, P. P. & Williams, D. A. (2006). Toward a conceptualization of perceived work family fit and balance: a demand and resources approach. Journal of Marital status and Family, 6 (78):22-36.

Wayne, J., Shore J. W., & Liden, D. S. (1997). Analysis of locus of control and educational level of utilizing the internal control index: Marshall University Graduate College.

Zijlistra, C. C. & Dorunen, C. I. (2003). Organizational support and work, Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 62(3), 981-988.

Zimet, C. A., Dahlen, T. C., Zimet, G. & Farley, C. C. (1988). Perceived organizational support and extra role performance which leads to which? The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 119-124.


Copyright (c) 2021 Tochukwu Matthew Oguegbe, Stephen Ebuka Iloke, Jerome Ogochukwu Ezisi, Enyeobi Bede Ofoma

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015 - 2018. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.


Hit counter