COMPARISON OF VIDEO CONFERENCE AND FACE TO FACE MENTORING SERVICES ON ADVISEES’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS
Abstract
The aim of the research is to compare the impacts of mentoring services, delivered face to face and video conference on advisees’ academic achievements. Mentoring services, made up with two different instruments, were administered to a group of advisees, composed of 32 university students. In the research, the multiple-choice achievement test, which consisted of thirty, 5-point Likert items, was utilized in order to determine advisees’ academic achievements.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
References
Adams, G. and Crews, T.B. (2004) Telementoring: A Viable Tool Journal of Applied Research for Business Instruction Volume 2, Issue 3.1-6.
American School Health Association. (2001). Enhancing youth achievement through telementoring. Journal of School Health, 71(3). 122-123.
Dorman, S. M, (2001). Are Teachers Using Technology for Instruction?, Journal of School Health, 71(2).83-84.
Harris, J. (Hansman, C. A. (2002) Critical Perspectives on Mentoring: Trend and Issues.
www.calproonline.org/eric/docs/mott/mentoring5.pdf Retrieved October 18, 2010.1999). A descriptive study of telementoring among students, subject matter experts, and teachers: Message flow and function patterns. Journal of Researchon Computing in Education, 32 (1), 36-53.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd edn.), Sage: London & Thousand Oaks, California.
O’Neill, D.K. and Scardamalia, M. (2000) Mentoring in the open: A strategy for supporting human development in the knowledge society .IKIT.
http://ikit.org/fulltext/2000 _Mentoring.pdf Retrieved on October 15, 2010.
Perez, S. & Dorman, S. M, (2001). Enhancing Youth Achievement Through Telementoring, Journal of School Health, 71(3): 122-123.
Single, P. B. & Muller, C. B. (1999). Electronic mentoring: Issues to advance research and
practice. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Mentoring Association. Atlanta, GA.
Trochim,W. M. K. (2001) The Research Methods Knowledge Base, Cincinnati. OH. Atomicdogpublishing U.S.A.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v0i0.13
Copyright (c) 2018 Necmi Esgi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.
