SECTARIAN BELIEFS, SOCIOPOLITICAL FACTORS, AND VIOLENCE AMONG INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN DAVAO CITY, PHILIPPINES
Abstract
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Almonte, J. (2005). Davao: A Sociocultural History. Pasig City, Philippines: Anvil Publishing.
Anaya, J. (2010). Implementation of Indigenous Rights Declaration Should Be Regarded as Political, Moral, Legal Imperative without Qualification, Third Committee Told. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/colombia/implementation-indigenous-rights-declaration-should-be-regarded-political-moral
Ben P. (2020). What are the sociopolitical factors? Teacher’s College: Columbia University.
Bomie C. (2017). Kagan: The Islamized Davao Natives. Davao City. Sun Star Davao. Retrieved from https://www.sunstar.com.ph/more-articles/kagan-the-islamized-davao-natives
Charles, J. P. (2015). The Impact of Social and Political Factors on Sectarian Beliefs among Indigenous People in Davao. Journal of Indigenous Studies, 10(2), 45-58.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Retrieved from https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
Fernandez, C. D. (2019). Exploring the Linkages between Religious Exclusivity and Violence among Indigenous People in Davao: A Sociopolitical Perspective. Philippine Journal of Indigenous Studies, 30(1), 67-82.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167-191. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/422690
Gonzales, R. L. (2018). Conflict and Religious Exclusivity among Indigenous People in Davao: A Study on the Influence of Sectarian Beliefs. Davao Research Review, 25(4), 112-125.
Indigenous Navigator, (n.d.). Question Guide – Community Questionnaire. Retrieved from https://indigenousnavigator.org/files/media/document/QuestionGuideCommunityQuestionnaireMay2018.pdf
IFES (2014). Securing the Rights of Indigenous Communities in the Philippines. Candid, Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.ifes.org/news/securing-rights-indigenous-communities-philippines
Jane M. (2021). Indigenous trauma and resilience: pathways to ‘bridging the river’ in social work education. Toronto, Canada: Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2021.1998427
Jessie S. (2022). Colonialism, Crime, and Dispute Resolution: A Critical Analysis of Canada’s Aboriginal Justice Strategy. Mediate. Canada
Keith N., (2023) Urban Aboriginal Peoples Study. INCA, First Nations University. Retrieved from https://www.uaps.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/UAPS-Non-Aboriginal-Survey-Questionnaire-FINAL-ENGLISH.pdf
Keith W., (2014). 21st Century Evangelicals A snapshot of the beliefs and habits of evangelical Christians in the UK - Spring 2014. Scottland, London. Evangelical Alliance. Retrieved from http://doc.ukdataservice.ac.uk/doc/7786/mrdoc/pdf/7786_24_religions_belief_and_unbelief_questionnaire.pdf
Leonna H. (2018). Intimate partner violence: Experiences of First Nations, Métis and Inuit women in Canada. Canada: Statistics Canada. Retrieved from https://iportal.usask.ca/record/70764
Meridith A. (2023). Crime worldwide - Statistics & Facts. Statista.
Montiel, C. (2017). Made Flesh and Blood: A History of Religion and Violence in the Philippines. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
Panem, S. (2018). Religious violence in the Southern Philippines: Localized conflicts and global inspirations. Terrorism and Political Violence, 30(2), 270-291.
Paul L. (2020). Practical Research: Planning and Design. 12th Edition. Colorado. Pearson. Retrieved from https://pce-fet.com/common/library/books/51/2590_%5BPaul_D._Leedy,_Jeanne_Ellis_Ormrod%5D_Practical_Res(b-ok.org).pdf
Santos, M. A. (2016). Religious Exclusivity and Violence among Indigenous People in Davao: An Exploration of the Role of Sociopolitical Factors. Indigenous Journal of Sociology, 15(3), 78-91.
Smith, R. (2000). Why War? The Cultural Logic of Iraq, the Gulf War, and Suez. University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from https://press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/763889.html
Tamar S. and Michal T. (2022). The social psychological roots of violent intergroup conflict. India. Spring Nature. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-022-00083-7
Tajfel, H. (1979). Social identity theory: Intergroup relations and group processes. Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 7(2), 7-24.
Wong, S. M. (2020). Understanding the Sociopolitical Factors Affecting Sectarian Beliefs and Conflict among Indigenous People in Davao. Journal of Conflict and Violence, 12(3), 112-129.
Zach B. (2020). What is an Alternative Hypothesis in Statistics?. Cincinnati Metropolitan. Statology.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v10i2.1763
Copyright (c) 2024 Angela Pauline A. Monterola, Janebelle M. Ignacio, Erika L. Altizo, Exequiel R. Gono Jr.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.