SECTARIAN BELIEFS, SOCIOPOLITICAL FACTORS, AND VIOLENCE AMONG INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN DAVAO CITY, PHILIPPINES

Angela Pauline A. Monterola, Janebelle M. Ignacio, Erika L. Altizo, Exequiel R. Gono Jr.

Abstract


This study investigates the relationship between sectarian beliefs, sociopolitical factors, and violence against indigenous people in Davao City. Utilizing a quantitative, non-experimental design with correlation analysis, the research focuses on measuring the prevalence of violence and evaluating significant relationships within the indigenous population of selected barangay in Davao City. Respondents were selected through non-stratified sampling, and data were collected via survey questionnaires. The levels of perceived sectarian belief, sociopolitical factors and violence against indigenous people are high. The findings indicate a significant relationship between sectarian beliefs, sociopolitical factors, and the emergence of violence in the community. These results highlight the crucial role of sociopolitical issues and sectarian beliefs in shaping conflict. To reduce violence and promote peace, the study recommends collaborative efforts among religious institutions, the Philippine National Police, local government units, and educational agencies. Culturally sensitive strategies, such as peacebuilding, capacity-building, and educational initiatives, are essential for fostering social cohesion, reconciliation, and community empowerment.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


violence, sectarian beliefs, sociopolitical factors, indigenous people, SDG, criminology, Philippines

Full Text:

PDF

References


Almonte, J. (2005). Davao: A Sociocultural History. Pasig City, Philippines: Anvil Publishing.

Anaya, J. (2010). Implementation of Indigenous Rights Declaration Should Be Regarded as Political, Moral, Legal Imperative without Qualification, Third Committee Told. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/colombia/implementation-indigenous-rights-declaration-should-be-regarded-political-moral

Ben P. (2020). What are the sociopolitical factors? Teacher’s College: Columbia University.

Bomie C. (2017). Kagan: The Islamized Davao Natives. Davao City. Sun Star Davao. Retrieved from https://www.sunstar.com.ph/more-articles/kagan-the-islamized-davao-natives

Charles, J. P. (2015). The Impact of Social and Political Factors on Sectarian Beliefs among Indigenous People in Davao. Journal of Indigenous Studies, 10(2), 45-58.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Retrieved from https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf

Fernandez, C. D. (2019). Exploring the Linkages between Religious Exclusivity and Violence among Indigenous People in Davao: A Sociopolitical Perspective. Philippine Journal of Indigenous Studies, 30(1), 67-82.

Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167-191. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/422690

Gonzales, R. L. (2018). Conflict and Religious Exclusivity among Indigenous People in Davao: A Study on the Influence of Sectarian Beliefs. Davao Research Review, 25(4), 112-125.

Indigenous Navigator, (n.d.). Question Guide – Community Questionnaire. Retrieved from https://indigenousnavigator.org/files/media/document/QuestionGuideCommunityQuestionnaireMay2018.pdf

IFES (2014). Securing the Rights of Indigenous Communities in the Philippines. Candid, Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.ifes.org/news/securing-rights-indigenous-communities-philippines

Jane M. (2021). Indigenous trauma and resilience: pathways to ‘bridging the river’ in social work education. Toronto, Canada: Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2021.1998427

Jessie S. (2022). Colonialism, Crime, and Dispute Resolution: A Critical Analysis of Canada’s Aboriginal Justice Strategy. Mediate. Canada

Keith N., (2023) Urban Aboriginal Peoples Study. INCA, First Nations University. Retrieved from https://www.uaps.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/UAPS-Non-Aboriginal-Survey-Questionnaire-FINAL-ENGLISH.pdf

Keith W., (2014). 21st Century Evangelicals A snapshot of the beliefs and habits of evangelical Christians in the UK - Spring 2014. Scottland, London. Evangelical Alliance. Retrieved from http://doc.ukdataservice.ac.uk/doc/7786/mrdoc/pdf/7786_24_religions_belief_and_unbelief_questionnaire.pdf

Leonna H. (2018). Intimate partner violence: Experiences of First Nations, Métis and Inuit women in Canada. Canada: Statistics Canada. Retrieved from https://iportal.usask.ca/record/70764

Meridith A. (2023). Crime worldwide - Statistics & Facts. Statista.

Montiel, C. (2017). Made Flesh and Blood: A History of Religion and Violence in the Philippines. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Panem, S. (2018). Religious violence in the Southern Philippines: Localized conflicts and global inspirations. Terrorism and Political Violence, 30(2), 270-291.

Paul L. (2020). Practical Research: Planning and Design. 12th Edition. Colorado. Pearson. Retrieved from https://pce-fet.com/common/library/books/51/2590_%5BPaul_D._Leedy,_Jeanne_Ellis_Ormrod%5D_Practical_Res(b-ok.org).pdf

Santos, M. A. (2016). Religious Exclusivity and Violence among Indigenous People in Davao: An Exploration of the Role of Sociopolitical Factors. Indigenous Journal of Sociology, 15(3), 78-91.

Smith, R. (2000). Why War? The Cultural Logic of Iraq, the Gulf War, and Suez. University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from https://press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/763889.html

Tamar S. and Michal T. (2022). The social psychological roots of violent intergroup conflict. India. Spring Nature. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-022-00083-7

Tajfel, H. (1979). Social identity theory: Intergroup relations and group processes. Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 7(2), 7-24.

Wong, S. M. (2020). Understanding the Sociopolitical Factors Affecting Sectarian Beliefs and Conflict among Indigenous People in Davao. Journal of Conflict and Violence, 12(3), 112-129.

Zach B. (2020). What is an Alternative Hypothesis in Statistics?. Cincinnati Metropolitan. Statology.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v10i2.1763

Copyright (c) 2024 Angela Pauline A. Monterola, Janebelle M. Ignacio, Erika L. Altizo, Exequiel R. Gono Jr.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.