FACTORS INFLUENCING THE KIPSIGIS' PERCEPTIONS OF CHILDLESSNESS: NARRATIVE ANALYSIS

Catherine C. Kitur

Abstract


Infertility is a significant problem that affects people of all cultures in the world. However, an increasing number of couples suffering due to childlessness is observed among the Kipsigis community in Fort-Ternan, Kericho County. Hence, the need to understand the reasons behind the changing trend as well as the Kipsigis perceptions of infertility. This study sought to answer the research questions: How does Kipsigis society perceive childlessness? What factors influence this perception? A qualitative study using an open ended interview and focus group discussion are employed in gathering information for this study. Heibert’s critical contextualization model is adopted in scrutinizing the Kipsigis perceptions. The narrative analysis revealed five issues: social, cultural, family, religion and economic factors as great influencers to the Kipsigis perceptions. The results suggested that child-bearing is perceived inevitable. Children are crucial in holding the marriage together without which; the union is not fully established. Children play important roles including formation of the family, expansion of the family lineage and they are the future legacy. It is therefore recommended for the Kipsigis Christians to understand the implications of childlessness in biblical perspective and to acknowledge an alternative view in light of God’s purposes in the world and to offer biblical, cultural and missiological guidance for the Kipsigis churches and the Kipsigis society.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


barrenness, involuntary childlessness, infertility, church

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asamoah-Gyadu, J. Kwabena. 2007. “Broken calabashes and covenants of fruitfulness”: Cursing barrenness in contemporary African Christianity. Journal of Religion in Africa 37(4): 437-460.

Daniluk, Judith C. and Joss Hurting-Mitchell. 2003. Themes of Hope and Healing: Infertile Couples Experiences of Adoption. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 21, 464- 486.

Heaton, Tim B., Cardell K. Jacobson and Xuan Ning Fu. 1992. Religiosity of Married Couples and Childlessness. Review of Religion Research 33 (3): 244-255.

Heaton, Tim B. 1986. How Does Religion Influence Infertility?: The Case of Mormons. Journal for the Scientific study of Religion 25 (2): 248-258.

Hiebert, Paul G. Transforming Worldviews: An Anthropological Understanding of How People Change. Grand Rapids, Mich: Baker Academic, 2008.

Hough Carolyn A. 2008. Re/producing Mothers: Structure and Agency in Gambian Kanyaleng Performances. Ethnology Review 47 (4): 257-269.

Kirk, Dudley and Bernard Pillet. 1998. Fertility Levels, Trends, and Differentials in Sub- Saharan Africa in the 1980s and 1990s. Studies in Family Planning 29 (1): 1-22.

Larsen, Ulla. 1994. Sterility in sub-Saharan Africa. Population Studies 48 (3): 459-474.

Larsen, Ulla. 1995. Differentials in Infertility in Cameroon and Nigeria. Population Studies 49 (2): 329-346.

Larsen, Ulla. 1996. Childlessness, Sub fertility, and Infertility in Tanzania. Studies in Family Planning 27 (1): 18-28.

Larsen, Ulla and Sharon Yan. 2000. Does female circumcision affect infertility and fertility? A study of the Central African Republic, Cote D’Ivoire, and Tanzania. Demography 37(3): 313-321.

Mammo, Abate and S. Philip Morgan. 1986. Childlessness in rural Ethiopia. Population and Development Review 12(3): 533-546.

Mbuwayesango, Dora R. 1997. Childlessness and Woman-to-woman relationships in Genesis and in African Patriarchal Society: Sarah and Hagar from a Zimbabwean Woman's Perspective. Semeia 78: 27-36.

McQuillan, Kevin. 2004. When does religion influence fertility? Population and Development Review 30(1): 25-56.

Nwachuku, Daisy N. 1994. Rituals and symbols in the healing of infertility in Africa: Pastoral counseling response. IN Church and Healing, ed. Emmanuel Larten and Daisy Nwachuku, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 66-84.

Potts, Deborah and Shula Marks. 2001. Fertility in Southern Africa: The Quiet Revolution. Journal of Southern African Studies 27 (2): 189-205

Renne, Elisha P. 2002. The fundamentals of fertility: Cosmology and conversion in a southwestern Nigerian town. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 8 (3): 551-569.

Uka, Emele Mba. 1991. The African family and issues of women's infertility. Africa Theological Journal 20(3):189-200.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v0i0.445

Copyright (c) 2018 Catherine C. Kitur

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.