THE INTERCONNECTION BETWEEN SCIENCE AND SOCIAL STUDIES CURRICULUM
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to see how well teacher trainees in selected Colleges of Education in Ghana would be helped to see both the differences between science and social studies, and the connections among them, using an action research design, including student interviews, observer logs, journal notes, students' ‘connection’ journals, student work, and record and planning book as data sources. The researchers designed and delivered an interdisciplinary science and social studies curriculum that focused on environment, water and energy. The sample comprised of 5,240 participants drawn from 3 Colleges of Education in the Central region of Ghana which were chosen by applying equal probability sampling technique. It was found that students were finally able to see the interdisciplinary nature of science, and social studies, as well as the connections between science and social studies. Implications include making explicit disciplinary instruction, as well as connections between the disciplines.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adediwura, A. A., & Tayo, B. (2007). Perception of teachers’ knowledge, attitude and teaching skills as predictor of academic performance in Nigerian secondary schools. Educational Research and Reviews, 2(7), 165-171.
Aiken, W. (1942). The Story of the Eight Year Study. New York: Harper.
Akerson, V. L. & Flanigan, J. (2000). Preparing Pre-service Teachers to Use an Interdisciplinary Approach to Science and Language Arts Instruction, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, pp. 345-362.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-based Approach on Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, pp. 295-317.
Alesandrini, K., & Larson, L. (2002). Teachers bridge to constructivism. The Clearing House, 75(3), 118-121.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford.
Baird, J. R., Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F. & White, R. T. (1991). The Importance of Reflection on Improving Science Teaching and Learning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, pp. 163-182.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, Co: BSCS, 5, 88- 98.
Caine, R. N. & Caine, G. (1991). Making Connections: teaching and the human brain. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Chandler, K. (1999). Working in Her Own Context: a case study of one teacher researcher, Language Arts, 77, pp. 27-33.
Campbell, C., & Henning, M. B. (2010). Planning, Teaching, and Assessing Elementary Education Interdisciplinary Curriculum. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 186(5) 156- 178.
Core Knowledge Sequence Foundation (1990). Core Knowledge Sequence. Charlottesville: Core Knowledge Sequence Foundation.
Curriculum Task Force of the National Commission on Social Studies in the Schools (1989). Charting the Course: social studies for the 21st century. Washington DC: The Commission.
Dickinson, V. L. & Young, T. A. (1998). Elementary Science and Language Arts: should we blur the boundaries? School Science and Mathematics, 98, pp. 334-339.
Dickinson, V. L., Burns, J., Hagen, E. R. & Locker, K. M. (1997). Becoming Better Primary Science Teachers: a description of our journey, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, pp. 295-311.
Drăghicescu, L. M., Petrescu, A. M., Cristea, G. C., Gorghiu, L. M., & Gorghiu, G. (2014). Application of problem-based learning strategy in science lessons–Examples of good practice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149(9), 297-301.
Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2001). Educational Psychology: Windows on classrooms. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Fueyo, V. & Neves, A. (1995). Pre-service Teacher as Researcher: a research context for change in the heterogeneous classroom, Action in Teacher Education, 14, pp. 39-49.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: the theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Gaskins, I. W. & Guthrie, J. T. (1994) Integrating Instruction of Science, Reading, and Writing: goals, teacher development, and assessment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, pp. 1039-1056.
Harding, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis from start to finish. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Harel, I. E., & Papert, S. E. (1991). Constructionism. New York: Ablex Publishing.
Harrell, P. E. (2010). Teaching an Integrated Science Curriculum: Linking Teacher Knowledge and Teaching Assignments. Issues in Teacher Education, 19(1), 145-165.
Hinde, E. R., Popp, S. E. O., Dorn, R. I., Ekiss, G. O., Mater, M., Smith, C. B., & Libbee, M. (2007). The integration of literacy and geography: The Arizona GeoLiteracy program's effect on reading comprehension. Theory & Research in Social Education, 35(3), 343-365.
Hubbard, R. S. & Power, B. M. (1993). The Art of Classroom Inquiry: a handbook for teacher researchers. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Kumar, M. (2005). An application of Six Sigma Methodology to reduce the engine -over heating problem in an automotive Company. Proceedings of the Institutions of Mechanical Engineers. Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 21(8), 633 - 646.
Li, Z. Z., Cheng, Y. B., & Liu, C. C. (2013). A constructionism framework for designing game‐like learning systems: Its effect on different learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 208-224.
Libler, R., Schlee, B. M., Shriner, M., Clark, D. A., & Nail, M. (2010). Social studies instruction: Changing teacher confidence in classrooms enhanced by technology. The Social Studies, 101(2), 37-45.
Lederman, N. G. & Niess, M. L. (1997). Integrated, Interdisciplinary, or Thematic Instruction? Is This a Question, or is it Questionable Semantics? School Science and Mathematics, 97, pp. 57-58.
McNiff, J., Lomax, P. & Whitehead, J. (1996) You and Your Action Research Project. London: Routledge.
McQuitty, V. (2016). Leading, following, and partnering: Introduction to the special issue on science and literacy integration. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 53(1), 1-3, https: doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2015.11252229.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1994). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Washington DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. National Science Resources Center (1996) Electric Circuits. Washington DC: Carolina Biological.
Patrick (2007). "Cultural Barriere to E-Government", Published by the National Audit Office 4th April.
Resnick, L. B. & Klopfer, L. E. (1989). Toward the Thinking Curriculum: current cognitive research. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective Practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Scott, C. A. (1994). Project-based Science: reflections of a middle school teacher. Elementary School Journal, 95, pp. 75-94.
Stanulis, R. N. & Jeffers, L. (1995). Action Research as a Way of Learning about Teaching in a Mentor/Student Teacher Relationship, Action in Teacher Education, 16, pp. 14-24.
Vars, G. F. (1991a). Integrated Curriculum in Historical Perspective, Educational Leadership, 49(2), pp. 14-15.
Vars, G. F. (1991b). A Bibliography of Research on the Effectiveness of Block-time, Core, and Interdisciplinary Team-Teaching Programs. Kent: National Association for Core Curriculum.
Vars, G. F. (1993). Interdisciplinary Teaching: why and how. Columbus: National Middle School Association.
Vars, G. F. & Rakow, S. R. (1992). Making Connections: integrative curriculum and the gifted student, Roeper Review, 16(1), pp. 48-53.
Winograd, K. & Evans, T. (1995). Pre-service Elementary Teachers’ Perceptions of an Action Research Assignment, Action in Teacher Education, 17, pp. 13-22.
Zee, A. H., van (1998). Preparing Teachers as Researchers in Courses on Methods of Teaching Science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, pp. 791-80.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v5i4.890
Copyright (c) 2020 Rebecca Esi Ampofo, Sabastine Fynn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.
