LITERATURE REVIEW OF THE INNOVATIVE LEARNING GLASS / LIGHTBOARD IN HYBRID EDUCATION

Eftychia Aslanidou

Abstract


This article provides a review of recent literature regarding the use of the innovative Learning Glass-type technologies in different educational settings. Learning Glass “LG” / Lightboard in Hybrid education, a modern educational tool produced in the United States (Western Michigan University, Southeastern University, San Diego State University & Cornell University) which works a two-sided flip board proven to promote learning growth and keeps students of typical and non-typical development engaged. Our purpose is to investigate the potential of this technology to serve as a supplement tool in a range of specifically targeted education settings, including culturally diverse learners, hybrid education and social media involvement. Preliminary evidence indicates the capabilities of LG to help instructors retain their students’ attention in the meta COVID-19 era. 

Αυτό το άρθρο παρέχει μια ανασκόπηση της πρόσφατης βιβλιογραφίας σχετικά με τη χρήση των καινοτόμων τεχνολογιών τύπου Learning Glass σε διαφορετικά εκπαιδευτικά περιβάλλοντα. Το Γυαλί Μάθησης "LG" / Lightboard στην υβριδική εκπαίδευση, είναι ένα σύγχρονο εκπαιδευτικό εργαλείο που παράγεται και χρησιμοποιείται στις Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες (Πανεπιστήμιο Δυτικού Μίτσιγκαν, Πανεπιστήμιο Southeastern, Πολιτειακό Πανεπιστήμιο του Σαν Ντιέγκο & Πανεπιστήμιο Κορνέλ), λειτουργεί με μια πλακέτα διπλής όψης που αποδεδειγμένα προωθεί τη γνωστική ανάπτυξη και κρατά αφοσιωμένους μαθητές τυπικής και μη τυπικής ανάπτυξης. Σκοπός μας είναι να διερευνήσουμε τις δυνατότητες αυτής της τεχνολογίας και το πώς χρησιμεύει ως συμπληρωματικό εργαλείο σε μια σειρά ειδικών στοχευμένων εκπαιδευτικών πλαισίων, συμπεριλαμβανομένων πολιτιστικά διαφορετικών μαθητών, μέσω της υβριδικής και δια ζώσης εκπαίδευσης και της συμμετοχής στα μέσα κοινωνικής δικτύωσης. Τα πρώτα στοιχεία υποδεικνύουν τις ποικίλες δυνατότητες του LG, το οποίο βοηθά τους εκπαιδευτές να διατηρήσουν την προσοχή των μαθητών τους στην εποχή της μετα COVID-19.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


Learning Glass, Lightboard in education, looking glass, IT in education, hybrid education, education technology, supplement digital tool in education, alternative education, media in education / Νέες Τεχνολογίες στην Εκπαίδευση, Νέα Μέσα στην Εκπαίδευση,

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, M. (2016). The Learning Glass with Matt Anderson. SDSU: CSU Institutional Repository.

Aslanidou, E. (2021). The importance of social situations, relational phenomena in young children: A review of recent evidence. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 6 (1), 35-39.

Aslanidou, E. (2019). Home Learning Activities and Children’s Learning Outcomes: A Review of Recent Evidence. European Journal of Education Studies, 6 (1), 100-159. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2375.

Beka-Bajrami, F. (2022). The use of Information Technology in education on the time of COVID-19-case study. 11th International Conference of Technium Science, 15-01.

Birdwell, J. A., & Peshkin, M. (2015). Capturing Technical Lectures on Lightboard. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 26-325.

Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school (2nd ed). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Chan, M. W., & Cushman, R. (2020). Beyond the Learning Glass. STEM Instructional Graduate Teaching Assistant Posters, 19. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/stem-gta-posters/19

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th edition). New York: Taylor & Francis.

Dawes, I. (2001). What stops teachers using new technology? In M. Leask (Ed.), Issues in Teaching using ICT. London: Routledge, 61- 79.

Dorantes, A. (2016). Economics and ‘The Learning Glass’ Technology. SDSU: CSU Institutional Repository. https://hdl.handle.net/10211.3/165572

Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., Cook, J. L., & Travers, J. F. (2000). Educational psychology: effective teaching, effective learning. NY: McGraw-Hill.

Firouzian, S., Rasmussen, C., & Anderson, M. (2016). Adaptations of learning glass solutions in undergraduate STEM education. The XIX Annual Conference on Research on Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 25-27, Pittsburgh, PA.

Foss, B., Oftedal, B. F., & Lokken, A. (2013). Rich Media e-Compendiums: A New Tool for Enhanced Learning in Higher Education, European Journal of Open, Distance and Learning, 16 (1), 102-114.

Fung, F. M. (2017). Adopting Lightboard for a Chemistry Flipped Classroom to Improve Technology-Enhanced Videos for Better Learner Engagement, Journal of Chemical Education, 94 (7), 956-959.

Gleason, B. & Greenhow, C. (2017). Hybrid Education: The Potential of Teaching and Learning with Robot-Mediated Communication. Online Learning Journal, 21 (4), 159-176.

Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(4), 700-717.

Gregoriadis, A., Grammatikopoulos, V., Tsigilis, N., & Zachopoulou, E. (2020). Assessing Teacher-Child Relationships: A cultural context perspective. In O. Saracho (Ed.). Handbook of Research on the Education of Young Children. 4th edition, pp. 322-332. New York, NY: Routledge. Doi: 10.4324/9780429442827

Hall, S., & Villareal, D. (2015). The Hybrid Advantage: Graduate Student Perspectives of Hybrid Education Courses. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27 (1), 69-80.

Hallas, J. (2020). Behind the Learning Glass. STEM Instructional Graduate Teaching Assistant Posters, 13. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/stem-gta-posters/13

Ivanović, M., Xinogalos, S., Pitner, T, & Savic, M. (2017). Technology enhanced learning in programming courses – international perspective. Educ Inf Technol 22, 2981–3003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9565-y

Kaqinari, T., Makarova, E., Audran, J., Döring, A. K., Göbel, K., & Kern, D. (2022). A Latent Class Analysis of University Lecturers’ Switch to Online Teaching during the First COVID-19 Lockdown: The Role of Educational Technology, Self-Efficacy, and Institutional Support. Education Sciences, 12(9), 607.

Karassavidis, I. (2001). Constructivist learning online. Possibilities and perspectives. In V. Makrakis (ed.), Proceedings of the Panhellenic Conference, 8-10 June 2001, Rethymnon.

Konstantakis, M., Lykiardopoulou, A., Lykiardopoulou, E., Tasiouli, G., & Heliades, G. (2022). An Exploratory Study of Mobile-Based Scenarios for Foreign Language Teaching in Early Childhood. Education Sciences, 12 (5), 306.

Koppe, C., Norgard, R. T., & Pedersen, A. Y. (2017). Towards a pattern language for hybrid education. VikingPLOP ’17: Proceedings of the VikingPLOP 2017 Conference on Pttern Languages of Program.

Laurillard, D., Oliver, M., Wasson, B., Hoppe, U. (2009). Implementing Technology-Enhanced Learning. In: Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Barnes, S. (eds) Technology-Enhanced Learning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_17

Liu, G. & Zhu, L. (2022). Information Technology-Based Picture Book Design of Children’s Intellectual and Educational Anecdotes. International Conference on Cognitive based Information Processing and Applications (CIPA 2021). Springer: Singapore. 982-985.

Lubrick, M., Zhou, G., & Zhang, J. (2019). Is the future bright? The potential of lightboard videos for student achievement and engagement in learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8), em1735.

Mayes, T., & De Freitas, S. (2007). Technology-Enhanced Learning, The Role of Theory. In: H. Beetham, R. Sharpe. (eds) Rethinking of Pedagogy for a Digital Age, Routledge, New York.

Misirlis, N., & Munawar, H. B. (2022). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use metaverse technologies. In 12th International Conference: The Future of Education (pp. 159-163).

Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2004). Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning. Future Lab Report, 11.

Negi, P. S., Negi, V. & Pandey, A. C. (2011). Impact of information technology on learning, teaching and human resource management in educational sector. International Journal of Computer Science and Telecommunications, 2 (4), 66-72.

Pedersen, A. Y., Norgaard, R. T., & Koppe, C. (2018). Patterns of inclusion: Fostering Digital Citizenship through Hybrid Education. Educational Technology & Society, 21 (1), 225-236.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Rogers, P. D., & Botnaru, D. T. (2019). Shedding Light on Student Learning through the Use of Lightboard Videos. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13 (3), 6.

Rostislav, F. (2014). Mobile Technologies Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 342-346.

Salomon, G., & Gardner, H. (1986). The computer as educator: Lessons from television research. Educational Researcher, 15 (1), 13-19.

Schweiker, S. S., Griggs, B. K., & Levonis, S. M. (2020). Engaging Health Student in Learning Organic Chemistry Reaction Mechanisms Using Short and Snappy Lightboard Videos. Journal of Chemical Education, 97 (10), 3867-3871.

Schweiker, S. S., & Levonis, S. M. (2020). A quick guide to producing a virtual chemistry course for online education. Future Medicinal Chemistry, 12 (14), 1289-1291.

Skibinski, E. S., DeBenedetti, J. I., Ortoll-Bloch, A. G., & Hines, M. A. (2015). A Blackboard for the 21st Century: An Inexpensive LightBoard Projection System for Classroom Use, Journal of Chemical Education, 92 (10), 1754-1756.

Sofos, A. (2021). Teaching practices for intercultural education using New Media. Athens: ION. [In Greek]

Talanda-Fisher, M. (2020). Through the Learning Glass. STEM Instructional Graduate Teaching Assistant Posters, 18. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/stem-gta-posters/18

Todman, J., & Duck, G. (1993). Primary children and teachers' attitudes to computers. Computers in Education, 20 (2), 199-203.

Tosheva, N., & Abdullaeva, G. (2022). The Concept of Innovation and Types of Innovative Technologies. Scientific progress, 3(3), 586-589.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v7i2.4563

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies (ISSN 2501-5915) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).