CONSERVATION LAW IN RELATIVE CLAUSES

Chig-Chung Guey

Abstract


The purpose of this present paper is to present a cognitive framework, coined as “Conservation Law,” which may shed new light on insightful understanding of the structures of sentences involving relative pronouns. Given that there are roughly four types of relative pronouns; namely, general, compound, relative adverbial, and quasi-relative, a conservation law in both structures and semantics exists. We start by combining two simple sentences into a resulting sentence with relative pronouns, and, through careful observation and calculation, we found the equivalence in word counts between original and resulting sentences. The conservation law mainly refers to the structure equivalence on either words or meanings among these four types of relative pronouns, or relative clauses. With the help of conservation law, the understanding of relative clauses can be much easier, because they are, among others, the most difficult and complex structures in English syntax, especially for EFL learners. Hopefully, this cognitive framework may be of great contribution to EFL English instruction. 

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


relative clauses, relative pronouns, conservation law, antecedent

References


Cooper, G. and Sweller, J. (1987). The effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. J. Educ. Psychol.

Gass, S.M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hamilton, R. L. (1994). Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Evidence from relativization instruction in a second language. Language Learning, 44, 123-157.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01096.x

Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-99.

Kuno, S. (1974). The position of relative clauses and conjunctions. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 117-136.

Paris, M. (1976). Relative Clause Formation in English and Mandarin Chinese and Ross’ Constraints: A contrastive Approach. The proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the English Contrastive Projects, University of Bucharest Press. Lock, 1996.

Sadighi, F. (1994). The acquisition of English restrictive relative clauses by Chinese, Japanese, and Korean adult native speakers. IRAL, 32, 141-153.

Safavi, K. (1994). Some Properties of Persian Relative Clauses. The proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Persian Linguistics, Allameh Tabatabaie University, Tehran.

Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 271-281.

Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.713

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).