Liu Pui Lee


This study explores kindergarten teachers’ understanding of, comments on their actual practice of giving feedback to children in Hong Kong. The research employed a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, with data being collected through questionnaires and interviews. The sample was chosen from the in-service kindergarten teachers who were enrolled in the teacher certificate course offered at Hong Kong Institute of Education during the academic year 2015-2016. Questionnaires were sent to 150 in-service kindergarten teachers and six teachers were interviewed. Finding indicates that many teachers have the basic understanding of using feedback. They can analyze the aims of giving students feedback not only from the perspectives of students, but also the interaction between teachers and students. However, they seldom explore it through the views from teachers. Teachers’ aims of giving students feedback are mostly for encouraging and it is mainly positive and appreciation. It is common for teachers to give motivational feedback in kindergartens, however, over-emphasize has its disadvantage. It is found that teachers encountered two problems. Firstly, teachers do not have adequate training about giving students feedback. Secondly, teachers lack follow-up work after giving feedback to students. Some suggestions for teachers’ development are made at the end of the paper.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Full Text:



Askew, S. & Lodge, C. (2000) Gifts, ping –pong and loops-linking feedback and learning. In Askew, S. (Ed.), Feedback for learning (pp.1-17). London and New York: Routledge.

Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Brown, G., Ngan, M.Y. (2010). Contemporary Educational Assessment. Hong Kong: Pearson.

Black, P. Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., William, D., (2003). Assessment for learning: putting into practice. England: Open University Press.

Black, P. and William, D. (1998a). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. London, England: School of Education, King’s College.

Black, P. and William, D. (1998b). Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.

Burke, D. (2009) Strategies for using feedback students bring to higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1) , pp.41-50.

Burnett. P. & Mandel, V. (2010). Praise and Feedback in the Primary Classroom: Teachers’ and Students’ perspectives. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 10, pp.145-156.

Butler, R. (1998). Enhancing and Undermining Intrinsic Motivation: the Effects of Task-involving and Ego-involving Evaluation on Interest and Performance. British journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1-4.

Callingham, R. (2008). Dialogue and Feedback. Assessment in the primary Mathematics Classroom, APMC, 13(3), 18-21

Dai Xiao-juan (2005). Comment is Indispensable in the Marking of English Assignments. Data of Culture and Education 36:140.

Gallavan, N. P. (2009). Developing Performance-Based Assessment. Singapore: SAGE Asia-Pacific Pvt. Ltd.

Gareis, C. R., Grant, L.W. (2008). Teacher Made Assessments. How to connect curriculum Instruction and Student Learning. New York: Eye on Education.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C.(2004). Does your assessment support your students’ learning? Journal of Teaching and learning in Higher Education, 1(1), .3-31.

Halverson, R. (2010). School Formative Feedback Systems, Peabody Journal of Education, 85, pp.130-146

Hargreaves, E., McCallum. B. & Gipps, G. (2000). Teacher strategies in primary classrooms-new evidence. In Askew, S. (Ed.) Feedback for learning, London and New York: Routledge.

Holmes, K., and Papageorgiou, G. (2009).Good, bad and insufficient: Students’ expectations, perceptions and uses of feedback, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, sport and Tourism Education, 8(1), 85-96.

Hong Kong Curriculum Development Council (2002). Basic Education Curriculum Guide – Building on Strengths. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

Johnson, P.H. (2004). Choice words: How our language affects children’s learning. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.

Koopmans, M. (2009). Feedback Mastering the Art of Giving and Receiving Feedback, Zaltbommel: Theme.

Lee, I. (2008). Student Reactions to Teacher Feedback: Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms, Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 21-32.

Li Kun-chung (1999) Multiple Teaching Evaluation:

Lu Sheng-liang (2009). With regard to Several Major Aspects of Comments in Compositions. Primary School Headmaster 2:83.

Liu Pui-lee (2007). Theory and Practice: Comments on the New Trend of Assessment in view of Hong Kong Primary Chinese Language Teachers. New Horizons in Education 1, 55: 51-58.

Mackey, A. (2006) Feedback, Noticing and instructed Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405-430.

Miller, S. P. (2002). Using effective teaching behaviors. In S. P. Miller, Validated practices for teaching student with diverse needs and abilities (pp.189-233). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Nightingale, P., Te Wiata, I., Toohey, S., Ryan, G., Hughes, C., & Magin, D. (1996). Assessing learning in Universities. Sydney: University of new South Wales.

Ovando, M.N. (1994). Constructive feedback: A key to successful teaching and learning, The International Journal of Educational Management, 8(6), 19-21.

Poulos, A & Mathony, M.J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143-154.

Quinton, A. & Smallbone, T. (2010) Feeding forward: using feedback to promote student reflection and learning – a teaching model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), pp.125-135

Ramsden, P. (2003) Learning to teach in higher education, London: Routledge.

Sadler, D. (1989) Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 119-144.

Schen, M. V. (2000). Teacher Feedback and Student Revision, Ann Arbor, Bell and Howell Information and Learning Company.

Sutton, R., & Clarke, P. (2006). Feedback for learning. Orbit, 36(2), 16-19.

Xu Jiang-mei (2009). How to Touch the Soul of Children through Comments in Compositions. China Education Innovation Herald 12:175.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Liu Pui Lee

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).