Tran Thi Que Nhi, Le Xuan Mai


Electronic portfolios (e-portfolios) have grown in popularity in ESL/EFL writing instruction for their contributions to students’ writing. However, selecting an electronic tool in e-portfolios is of concern to many researchers and teachers. The combination of Facebook and e-portfolios is a rather new implementation in educational research, especially in high school contexts. Therefore, the current research aimed at exploring (1) high school students’ perceptions of the use of Facebook-based e-portfolios in terms of their contributions in writing, and (2) problems in using Facebook-based e-portfolios in writing. Fifty grade 11 students at a high school in Soc Trang province, Vietnam participated in the research. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected by using close-ended questionnaire and the interview. Prior to data collection, the students spent six weeks writing on Facebook close-typed groups. The results showed that the students highly appreciated the contributions of Facebook-based e-portfolios in terms of enhancing interaction, giving and receiving feedback, motivation and confidence in writing, writing skills, vocabulary, and grammar knowledge. No significant problems were found in using Facebook-based e-portfolios. The research is expected to shed light on implementing Facebook-based e-portfolios in improving the quality of teaching EFL/ESL writing in high school contexts.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



Facebook-based e-portfolios, perceptions, contributions, problems, high school students, EFL writing

Full Text:



AbuSa’aleek, A. O. (2015). Students’ perceptions of English language learning in the Facebook context. Teaching English with Technology, 15 (4), 60-75.

Alawdat, M. (2015). A qualitative case study exploring the implementation of e-portfolios by writing teachers in PASSHE schools. Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from https://knowledge.library.iup.edu/etd/459.

Alfaki, I. M. (2015). University students’ English writing problems: diagnosis and remedy. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 3 (3), 40-52.

Aliweh, A. M. (2011). The effect of electronic portfolios on promoting Egyptian EFL college students’ writing competence and autonomy. Asian EFL Journal, 13 (2), 90-132.

Aydin, S. (2010). EFL writers’ perceptions of portfolio keeping. Assessing Writing, 15, 194-203. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.08.001

Aydin, S. (2014). EFL writers’ attitudes and perceptions toward F-portfolio use. TechTrends, 58 (2), 59-77.

Babaee, M., & Tikoduadua, M. (2013). E-portfolios: A new trend in formative writing assessment. International Journal of Modern Education Forum (IJMEF), 2 (2), 49-56.

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54 (2), 153-160.

Barrot, J. S. (2016). Using Facebook-based e-portfolio in ESL writing classrooms: impact and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/0798318.2016.1143481.

Bhela, B. (1999). Native language interference in learning a second language: exploratory case studies of native language interference with target language usage. International Education Journal, 1 (1), 22-31.

Blackburn-Brockman, E. (2001). Prewriting, planning, and professional communication. The English Journal, 91(2), 51-53. DOI: 10.2307/822345.

Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (ITDL), 6 (1), 17-28.

Erice, D., & Ertas, A. (2011). The impact of e-portfolio on foreign language writing skills. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 44 (2), 73-94.

Erkan, D, Y,. & Saban, A, Y. (2011). Writing performance relative to writing apprehension, self-efficacy in writing, and attitudes towards writing: a correlational study in Turkish tertiary-level EFL. Asian EFL Journal, 13 (1), 163-191.

Fakir, S. A. A. (2010). Assessment portfolios in an intensive English writing program: opportunities and challenges. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Memphis.

Hornby, A. S. (2005). Oxford advanced learners’ dictionary of current English (7th ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jordaan, W. J., & Jordaan, J. (1986). Man in context. McGraw-Hill.

Kabilan, M., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13 (4), 179-197.

Kahtani, S. A. (1999). Electronic Portfolios in ESL Writing: An Alternative Approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(3), 261-268.

Khodashenas, M. R., & Rakhshi, F. (2017). The effect of electronic portfolio assessment on the writing performance of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Research in English Education 2(3), 67-77.

Kitchakarn, O. (2016). How students perceived social media as a learning tool in enhancing their language learning performance. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15 (4), 53-60.

Kongsuebchart, J., & Suppasetseree, S., (2016). A weblog-based electronic portfolio to improve English writing skills of Thai EFL undergraduate students. Learning in and beyond the Classroom: Ubiquity in Foreign Language Education, 148-158.

Lopez-Fernandez, O & Rodriguez-Illera, Z. L. (2009). Investigating university students’ adaptation to a digital learner course portfolio. Computer and Education, 52 (3), 608-616. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.003

Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005, July). An overview of e-portfolios. Educause Learning Initiative, 1-28.

Luu, T. T. (2010). Enhancing EFL learner’s writing skills via journal writing. English Language Teaching, 3 (3), 81-88.

Ly, T. T. (2007). Learners’ motivation and identity in the Vietnamese EFL writing classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6 (1), 51-63. From: http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/2007v6n1art8.pdf

Maranto, G., & Barton, M. (2010). Paradox and promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the sociopolitics of social networking in the writing classroom. Computers and Composition 27, 36–47.

McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26 (6), 729-740.

Muñoz, C. & Towner, T. (2009). Opening Facebook: How to use Facebook in the college classroom. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2623-2627). Charleston, SC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/31031/.

Nguyen, A. T. (2015). The impact of the use of portfolio on EFL learners’ writing performance. Unpublished M.A thesis, Can Tho University, Vietnam.

Nguyen, H. H. T. (2009). Teaching EFL writing in Vietnam: Problems and solutions – a discussion from the outlook of applied linguistics. VNU Journal of Science, Foreign Languages, 25, 61-66.

Nguyen, T. H. (2015). Problems affecting learning writing skill of grade 11 at Thong Linh high school. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 3 (2), 53-69.

Nguyen, T. M. H. (2017). The effects of portfolios on Vietnamese EFL learners’ writing performance. Unpublished M.A thesis, Can Tho University, Vietnam.

Nguyen, T. Q. P. (2015). The effects of peer feedback on Facebook on EFL students’ writing performance. Unpublished M.A thesis, Can Tho University, Vietnam.

Nunan, T. (2000). “Exploring the concept of flexibility”. In V. Jakupec and J. Garrick (eds.), Flexible learning, human resource and organizational development: Putting theory to work. London: Routledge, 47–66.

Ping, N. S., & Maniam, M. (2015). The effectiveness of Facebook group discussions on writing performance: a study in Matriculation College. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 4 (1), 30-37.

Saeedi, Z., & Meihemi, H. (2015). E-portfolio as a corrective platform towards EFL students’ overall/ componential writing performance. Teaching English with Technology 15 (4), 76-79.

Shih, R. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27 (5), 829-845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.934

Shukor, S. S,. & Noordin, N. 2014. Effects of Facebook collaborative writing groups on ESL undergraduates’ writing performance. International Journal of English Language Education, 2 (2), 89-99. doi:10.5296/ijele.v2i2.5868.

Soc Trang Department of Education and Training. (2017). Hướng dẫn thực hiện nhiệm vụ giáo dục trung học 2017-2018. Vietnam: Soc Trang Department of Education and Training. Retrieved from http://www.soctrang.edu.vn/Default.aspx?tabId=1428&id=538

Suthiwartnarueput, T., & Wasanasomsithi, P. (2012). Effects of using Facebook as a medium for discussions of English grammar and writing of low-intermediate EFL students. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9 (2), 194-214.

Thang, S. M., Lee, Y, S., & Zulkifli, N. F. (2012). Information and communication technology and English language skills: the voices of six Malaysian undergraduates. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25 (3), 277-293. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2012.655299.

Tran, L. (2001). Using pair work and group work in teaching writing. Teacher’s Edition, 22-26.

Trinh, K. L. (2007). The effectiveness of portfolio-based assessment in English-as-a-foreign language writing setting. Unpublished M.A thesis, Can Tho University, Vietnam.

Ung, T. T. (2010). The effects of assessment portfolio strategies on EFL learners’ writing anxiety. Unpublished M.A thesis, Can Tho University, Vietnam.

Valdez, P. N. (2010). Reflections on using the digital portfolio in academic writing in a Philippine university: Problems and possibilities. Philippine ESL Journal, 5, 160-170.

Vietnamese Government. (2008). Quyết định 1400/QĐ-TTg Quyết định về việc phê duyệt đề án 'Dạy và học ngoại ngữ trong hệ thống giáo dục quốc dân giai đoạn 2008-2020' References 121 [Government’s Decision on the Rectification of the Project “Foreign Languages Teaching and Learning in the National Education System in the Period of 2008-2020”]. Hà Nội: Vietnamese Government. Retrieved from: http://www.chinhphu.vn/portal/page/portal/chinhphu/hethongvanban?class_id=1&_page=18&mode=detail&document_id=78437

Vu, K. D. (2010). The impact of written scaffolding on high school students’ writing performance and attitudes. Unpublished M.A thesis, Can Tho University, Vietnam.

Wetzel, K., & Strudler, N. (2006). Costs and benefits of electronic portfolios in teacher education: student voices. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22 (3), 99-208.

Williams, J. (2005). Teaching writing in second and foreign language classroom. Mc Graw Hill.

Yeh, S. (2015). Mature Taiwanese writers’ development of writing and voices between different academic environments. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6 (5), 197-208.

Yunus, M. Md., & Salehi, H. & Chenzi, C. (2012). Integrating social networking tools into ESL writing classroom: strengths and weaknesses. English Language Teaching, 5 (8), 42-48.

Zulfikar. (2016). Benefits of web-based or electronic portfolio assessment in ESL classroom. Englisia, 4 (1), 1-9.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1693


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Tran Thi Que Nhi, Le Xuan Mai

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).