Murat Debbağ


In distance education, synchronous or asynchronous vehicles and ways are used as the mediums of information transmission. The aim of this study is to identify the students' opinions about online asynchronous lesson videos used in distance education practices. We made use of qualitative research methods in this descriptive study. The study sample which was created in compliance with the purposeful sampling method was composed of 22 students studying at distance education undergraduate programs of a university located in The West Blacksea district. In the study, ‘Opinion Identification Questionaire of The Distance Education Videos’ which included a series of open-ended questions formed by the researcher, himself, was used. According to the results from the analyses, distance education students stated that videos made their learning permanent, increased their motivation and enabled them with individual learning. They criticize the videos including only slights and sound in addition to the lack of interaction in the videos. Besides, students give advices about making videos accessible for watching on mobile phones, adding interactions and using different video-making techniques.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



distance education, lesson videos, asynchronous videos

Full Text:



Ananthanarayanan, V. (2014). Social presence in culturally mediated online learning environments. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Student-Teacher interaction in online learning environments (pp. 1-21). Texas, USA: IGI Global.

Belcheir, M.J., & Cucek, M. (2001). Student perceptions of their distance education courses (Research Report. No. 2001-04). Idaho: Office of Institutional Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.boisestate.edu/iassess/reports/2001/RR2001-04.pdf

Buckley, W., & Smith, A. (2007). Application of multimedia technologies to enhance distance learning. RE: view, 39(2), 57-65.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Ç., E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık

Carter, V. (1996). Do media influence learning? Revisiting the debate in the context of distance education, Open Learning, 11(1), 31–40. DOI: 10.1080/0268051960110104

Choi, H. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2005). The effect of context-based video instruction on learning and motivation in online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 215-227.

Clark, R. E. (1991). When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media. Educational Technology 31(2): 34–40.

EDUCAUSE. (2008). 7 things you should know about lecture capture. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7044.pdf

Evans, H., & Cordova, V. (2015), Lecture videos in online courses: A follow-up, Journal of Political Science Education, 11(4), 472-482. DOI: 10.1080/15512169.2015.1069198

Eygü, H., Karaman, S., (2013), Uzaktan Eğitim Öğrencilerinin Memnuniyet Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 36-59.

Fernandez, V., Simo, P., & Sallan, M. (2009). Podcasting: A new technological tool to facilitate good practice inhigher education. Computers & Education, 53, 385-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.014

Giannakos, M., Chorianopoulos, K., & Chrisochoides, N. (2015). Making sense of video analytics: Lessons learned from clickstream interactions, attitudes, and learning outcome in a video-assisted course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/rt/printerFriendly/1976/3198

Gunawardena, C. N., & Mcısaac, M. S. (2004). Distance Education. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), The Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd Ed. (pp. 355-395). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from http://ocw.metu.edu.tr/file.php/118/Week10/Gunawardena-McIsaac-distance-ed.pdf

Hegeman, J. (2015). Using instructor generated video lectures in online mathematics courses improves student learning. Online Learning, 19(3), 70-87.

Howard, I. (2014). 7 steps Guide to Screencasting. Speech and Motor Neuroscience Group, Plymouth University. Retrieved from http://www.ianhoward.de/publications/ScreencastingGuide_ ISH_ 2014.pdf

Hughes, G. (2009). Social software: New opportunities for challenging social inequalities in learning? Learning, Media and Technology, 34(4), 291-305.

Jamaludin, R., & Osman, S. Z. M. (2014). The use of a flipped classroom to enhance engagement and promote active learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(2), 124-131.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Maag, M. (2004). The effectiveness of an interactive multimedia learning tool on nursing students’ math knowledge and self-efficacy. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 22 (1), 26–33.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Technical Report. USA: US Department of Education.

Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (2011). Distance Education in Higher Education (Indicator 43- 2011). The Condition of Education 2011. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/coe_dhe.pdf

Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2008). Exploring two teacher education online learning designs: A classroom of one or many?. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 475-495.

Reisetter, M., & Boris, G. (2004). What works: Student perceptions of effective elements in online learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(4), 277-291.

Rose, Katherine Kensinger. (2009). “Student perceptions of the use of instructor-made videos in online and face-to-face classes.” Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 5(3).

Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. Newyork: McGraw-Hill.

Sadik, A. (2016). Students’ Preferences for Types of Video Lectures: Lecture Capture vs. Screencasting Recordings. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 25(2), 189-208.

Sankey, M. (2013). Lecture capture in Australasian universities. The Australasian Council on Open, Distance and e-Learning (ACODE). Retrieved from http://www.acode.edu.au/pluginfile.php/419/mod_resource/content/1/ACODE_Lecture_Capture_Report_2013.pdf

Schnitman, I. (2007) The dynamics involved in Web based learning environment (WLE) interface design and human-computer interactions (HCI): Connections with learning performance (Doctoral dissertation). West Virginia University, Morgantown.

Tempelman-Kluit, N. (2006). Multimedia learning theories and online instruction. College & Research Libraries, 67(4), 364-369.

Vanbuel, M. (2012). How to move beyond lecture capture: Technology guide. The European Commission. Retrieved from http://association.media-and-learning.eu

Veeramani, R., & Bradley, S. (2008). Insights regarding undergraduate preference for lecture capture. University of Wisconsin-Madison E-Business Institute. Retrieved from http://www.companywebcast.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Insights_undergraduate_preference_lecture_capture.pdf

Whatley, J., & Amrey A. (2007). Using video to record summary lectures to aid students’ revision. Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 184–195.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Zhang, Dongsong, Lina Zhou, Robert O. Briggs, & Jay F. Nunamaker. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information and Management, 43(1): 15–27.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1701


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Murat Debbağ

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).