Salih Gülen


The purpose of this research is the determination of the effect of the activities of the planetarium on students' views, three-dimensional thinking skills and academic achievement. Mixed method was used in the research. The embedded pattern is preferred because qualitative data are supported by quantitative data that was used a single group pre-posttest experimental design. Homogeneous sampling was used in the study. A fully structured interview form and a three-dimensional thinking skill form have been prepared for the qualitative data. An academic achievement test has been developed for the quantitative data. Both descriptive and content analyses were done with frequency and Wilcoxon signed test techniques outside of the code-category and theme. Interpretation of the findings; as a result of planetarium activities in general, it has been found that the majority of students use positive expressions. It has been determined that the three dimensions skills of students is low in terms of size, distance and relationship dimensions between the Solar System and the planets. It has been determined that the same students' three dimensional thinking skills for the Earth and its satellite are high in size and distance dimensions but in relations and three dimensions complete are middle. It has been discovered that activities in the planetarium have increased academic achievement at both the seventh and eighth grade. Planetarium activities as a coincidence in the result of the research have an effect on eliminating the misconceptions of the students. Suggestions are made according to the study result.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



planetarium activities, three-dimensional thinking skills, students' views, academic achievement, Solar System and beyond

Full Text:



Ayaz, M., & Demirkuş, N. (2017). Example works in the development of course materials in science course using virtual and objective technological teaching tools. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Faculty, 14(1), 1357-1376.

Bodur, Z., & Yıldırım, M. (2018). The effect of outdoor activities on academic achievement and scientific process skills of 7th students in secondary school. Journal of Educational Sciences, 47(47), 125-140. DOI: 10.15285/maruaebd.271564

Bozdoğan, A.E. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ views about "informal learning environments in science education” course. International journal of Turkish Education Science, 5(8), 1-17.

Büyüköztürk, S. (2014). Experimental patterns, pretest-posttest control group patterns and data analysis. Ankara: Pegema Publishing.

Büyüköztürk, S., Çokluk, Ö., & Köklü, N. (2013). Statistics for social sciences. Ankara: Pegema Publishing.

Çepni, S. (2010). Introduction to research and project work (5th edition).Trabzon: Ofset typography.

Chen, C. H., Yang, J. C., Shen, S., & Jeng, M. C. (2007). A desktop virtual reality earth motion system in astronomy education. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 289-304.

Cohen, C.A., & Hegarty, M. (2012). Inferring cross sections of 3D objects: A new spatial thinking test. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 868-874.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative research methods (Trans. Ed.: Whole, M., & Demir, S. B.). Ankara: Political Publications Distribution.

Demirkuş, N. (2018). Instructional technology and material design development course notes. Access date:13.08.2018

Demirkuş, N., & Gülen, S. (2017). Development of visual course material with popular concepts of physics. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Faculty, 14(1), 320-338.

Ertaş Kılıç, H., & Şen, A. İ. (2014). The effect of physics education based on out of school learning activities and critical thinking on students ‘attitudes. Education and Science, 39(176), 13-30.

Ertaş, H. ve Şen, A.İ. (2011). Out-of-school learning environments in science teaching, Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publications.

Gilbert J.K. (2005) Visualization: A Metacognitive Skill in Science and Science Education. In: Gilbert J.K. (eds) Visualization in Science Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI

Glesne, C. (2013). Introduction to qualitative research (Translated by Ersoy, A., & Yalçınoglu, P.). Ankara: Anı Publishing.

Gülen, S., & Demirkuş, N., (2014). Effect of visual material on student success in "Solar System and Beyond: Space puzzle" unit. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Faculty, 11(1), 1-19.

Hufnagel, B., Slater, T., Deming, G., Adams, J., Adrian, R. L., Brick, C., & Zeilik, M. (2000). Pre-course Results from the Astronomy Diagnostic Test. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 17(2), 152-155.

Merriam, S. B. (2013). A guide to qualitative research design and practice (Trans.Turan, S.). Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

Özcan, H., & Yılmaz, Ş. (2018). Investigation of the preservice science teachers’ astronomy conceptions via planetarium trip. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 392-418. DOI: 10.17522/balikesirnef.437815

Pittalis, M. & Christou, C. (2010). Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 191-212.

Repenning, A., Webb, D., Brand, C., Gluck, F., Grover, F., Miller, S., Nickerson, H., & Song, M. (2014). Beyond minecraft facilitating computational thinking through modeling and programming in 3D. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 14, 68-71.

Sontay, G., Tutar, M., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). Student views about science teaching with outdoor learning environments: planetarium tour. Journal of Research in Informal Environments, 1(1), 1-24.

Taşcan, M., & Ünal, İ. (2015). Importance of astronomy education and evaluation in terms of training programs in Turkey. Journal of Buca Education Faculty, 40, 25-37.

Türk, C. (2018). Preschool teachers in the context of teaching astronomy. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 11(3), 544-561. DOI:

Türk, C., Kalkan, H. (2015). The effect of planetariums on teaching specific astronomy concepts, Journal of Science Education and Technology. 24(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-014-9516-6

Türk, C., Kalkan, H. (2017). Teaching seasons with hands-on models: Model transformation, Research in Science & Technological Education. 36(3), 324-352. DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2017.1401532

Tüzün, H., Alsancak-Sirakaya, D., Altintaş-Tekin A., & Yaşareren, S. (2016). An investigation of presence in three-dimensional multi-user virtual environments. H. U. Journal of Education, 31(3): 475-490. DOI: 10.16986/HUJE.2016015867

Yavuz Topaloğlu, M. &. Balkan Kıyıcı, F. (2018). The effect of activities conducted in out-of-school learning environments on students’ opinions about socio-scientific issues: organ donation and genetically modified organisms, E-International Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 2018, 36-50, DOI: 10.19160/ijer.350189

Yıldırım, A., & Simsek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Salih Gülen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).