INFLUENCE OF PEER RESPONSE GROUPS’ STRATEGY ON WRITING ACHIEVEMENTS IN KISWAHILI LANGUAGE AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN KISII COUNTY, KENYA

Abobo Francis

Abstract


Writing is fundamental to effective communication particularly in this era in which e-mail and other word processed documents are the norm rather than the exception in a workplace. Writing apprehension is a result not a cause. It is a result of lacking knowledge or understanding necessary to complete the writing task and the students’ belief that writing is hard work. Writing is one of the four skills in Kiswahili language needed for written communication. However, previous studies point out that poor instructional strategies in Kiswahili language; not only limit the writing skills but also reduce students’ curiosity in writing. Until then, little was known about the influence of peer response groups’ strategy on students’ writing essays. The purpose of this Paper, therefore, was to determine the influence of peer response groups’ strategy on writing achievements in Kiswahili language among secondary school students in Kisii County, Kenya. To achieve this purpose, this paper sought to achieve the following objectives: to determine teachers’ competence in applying peer response strategy in classrooms and describe how response peer groups’ strategies impact writing in Kiswahili language. This paper adopted qualitative design. This paper was conducted in Kisii County secondary schools. The paper targeted secondary schools, teachers and form three students. The paper used interviews, observations and focus discussions to collect data. The paper held face to face interviews with teachers. Qualitative data was analysed thematically and findings were quoted directly in text. The major findings of this paper were that: peer response strategy enhance students’ drafts, lead to meaningful revisions, increase learners’ vocabulary and encourage students to write and revise drafts. This paper recommends that teachers ought to apply peer response groups’ strategy in the teaching of Kiswahili language in classrooms so that to enhance students’ writing achievements.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


influence of peer response groups’ strategies, writing achievements, Kiswahili language, secondary school students, Kisii County, Kenya

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Jamal, D. (The impacts of peer response in enhancing ninth-graders’ writing skills. Department of curricula and instruction Multah University. Jordan. Vol.1-No. Moharram 1430. January 2009

Anderson, L.W. (2004). Increasing teacher effectiveness. Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.

Beyer, L. (2002). The politics of standards and the education of teachers. Teaching Education, 13, 3, pp. 305-316

Darling-Hammond, L. & Baratz-Snowden, J. (2005). A good teacher in every classroom. USA: Jossey Bass

Ingvarson, L. (1998a). Professional development as the pursuit of professional standards: the standards-based professional development system. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 2, pp. 127-140.

Kangahi, M. & Indoshi, F.C. (2012). Teaching styles and learners achievement in Kiswahili language in secondary schools. International Journal of academic in progressive education and development July 2012, vol. 1. No; 3 ISSN; 2226-6348.

Kenya National Examination Council (2012). Kenya National Examination Council Report. Nairobi-Kenya. Government Printers.

Kobia, M. (2009). Challenges facing implementation of secondary Kiswahili curriculum in Kenya. Iranian Journal of language studies CIJ. Vol.3 (3). 2009 (pp.303-316).

Koross, B, Indoshi, F, C. and Okwach, T. (2013). Perception of teachers and students towards methods used in teaching and learning of English writing skills in secondary schools. International Journal of English language and Linguistics Research Vol 1, No. 1, pp.32-38, June 2013. Published by European centre for research training and development UK

Lui. J. & J.G. Hansen (2005). Peer Response in second Language writing classrooms. Michigan series on teaching writers.

Mahmood, A. (2010). Teachers’ handbook. Pakistan: Qurban & Surrraya Educational Trust.

Mcber, H. (2000). Research into teacher effectiveness: a model of teacher effectiveness. Research report 216. DfEE.

Michieka, M. (2010). Language maintenance and shift among Kenyan University students. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of African Linguistics (ACAL) University of Toronto Canada.

Msanjila, P. (2005). “Problems of Writing in Kiswahili: A case study of Kigurunyembe and Morogoro Secondary Schools in Tanzania.” Nordic Journal of African Studies (1411) 15-25.

Oser, F. Κ.Α. (2006). Competence- oriented teacher training: old research demands and new pathways. In: F. Oser, F. Achterhagen & U. Renild, (Eds.), Competence oriented teacher training: old research demands and new pathways (pp. 1- 7). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher,

Peckham, I. (1996). If it broke, why fix it? Disruptive and constructive computer-mediated response group practices. Computers and Composition, 13, 327-339.

Piaget, J. (1932). The language and thought of the child. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Richards, C. (1990). Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Sima, S. (2001). Exchanging Ideas with Peers in Network Based Classrooms: An Aid or a Pain. Language Learning & Technology .103- 134.

Turner- Bisset, R. (2001). Expert teaching: knowledge and pedagogy to lead the profession. London: David Fulton.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Yan, G: A process Genre Model for Teaching Writing, The English teaching from, V. 43, No. 3, 2005.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Abobo Francis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).