ΤHE IMPACT OF COGNITIVE DIMENSION OF TAM-PERCEIVED USEFULNESS AND PERCEIVED EASE OF USE IN TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ICT’S INTEGRATION IN TEACHING ANCIENT GREEK LANGUAGE IN LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOL: THE CASE OF GREECE
Abstract
This study aims to delve deeper into Greek teachers’ attitudes towards the use of ICT in ancient Greek teaching, in Greek public lower secondary schools, representing an attempt to identify the Cognitive Dimension of Greek teachers’ of ancient Greek language (philologists) attitudes. More specifically, the main goal is to examine Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness concerning teachers’ of ancient Greek degree of familiarity with ICTs and the degree of effectiveness in ICT’s integration in teaching and learning practice.
As for Perceived Ease of Use this research study investigates, in respect of teachers’ attitudes:
a) ICT’s degree of personal and educational use,
b) Self-perception degree towards ICT’s use, and
c) Degree of ability in ICT’s teaching integration.
As for Perceived Usefulness this study investigates:
a) ICT’s usefulness degree in achieving learning objectives,
b) Usefulness degree in teaching application of ICT, and
c) ICT’s effectiveness degree as for teachers’ role.
Broadly speaking, the research findings reveal that teachers of ancient Greek, use ICTs to do their lesson preparation and planning, but they are not used to integrating technology in teaching practices.
Yet, Greek teachers of ancient Greek language consider -as important barrier/factor to use ICT in teaching and learning process- their lack of effective training in ICT’s teaching use. As a result, they show low self-perception degree -as for ICT’s use- and become more and more reluctant to adopt new technologies in teaching and learning procedure. Moreover, the findings stress that Greek philologists firmly believe that ICT can be used as an innovative tool of teaching and learning procedure, motivating teachers and increasing their interest in teaching approach. However, New Educational Technology is not applied in teaching practice and teachers of ancient Greek language -denied to ‘escape’ from traditional ways of teaching- prefer conventional/traditional teaching practices in ICT’s use to modern/contemporary teaching methods, achieving mainly cognitive goals.
To sum up: a) gender, b) years of experience in teaching, c) specific knowledge in teaching ancient Greek language with ICT, and d) appropriate in-service training on ICTs have a significant impact on teachers’ of ancient Greek attitudes, regarding whether or not ICT’ s use enhance:
a) traditional teaching style,
b) linguistic literacy,
c) critical literacy,
d) sociocultural literacy.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Albirini, A., 2006. Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers and Education, 47(4), 373- 398.
Allport, G. W., 1935. Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Eds.), Handbook of social Psychology (pp. 798-844). Worcester: Clark University Press.
Al-Oteawi, S. M., 2002. The perceptions of Administrators and teachers in utilizing information technology in instruction, administrative work, technology planning and staff development in Saudi Arabia. PhD Thesis, Ohio University.
Bikos, K., 1993. Teachers and Computers: Teachers’ attitudes relative to the introduction of computers in education. Thessaloniki (in greek).
Braak, J., 2000. Predictors of Class Use of Computers. International Conference on Mathematics, Science Education and Technology, 1, 220-225.
Brun, M., 2014. Learning to become a teacher in the 21st century: ICT integration in initial teacher education in Chile. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(3), 222-238.
Buabeng-Andoh, C., 2012. Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education & Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136-155.
Carter, D.S.G. and Leeh, D.J.K., 2001. Validating Behavioural Change: Teachers' Perception and Use of ICT in England and Korea. ERIC Publications No ED460133.
Cobb, P., and Steffe, L. P., 1983. The constructivist Researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 83-94.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K., 2008. The Methodology of Educational Research, 5th Edition. London: Routledge Falmer.
Cox, M., Preston, C. and Cox, K., 1999a. What factors support or prevent teachers from using ICT in their classrooms? Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference (University of Sussex at Brighton, September 2- 5).
Cox, M.J., Preston, C., and Cox, K., 1999b. What Motivates Teachers to use ICT? Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference (University of Sussex at Brighton, September 2-5).
Creswell, J., 2011. Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 4th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Cronbach, L. J., and Shavelson, R. J., 2004. My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391-218.
Davis, F. D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance
of information technology. M IS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
Davis, F. D., 1993. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475-487.
Demetriadis, S., Barbas, A., Molohides, A., Palaigeorgiou, G., Psillos, D., Vlahavas, I., Tsoukalas, I., and Pombortsis, A., 2003. Cultures in negotiation: teachers' acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools, Computers and Education, 41(1), 19-37.
Diamantaki, Κ. , Davou, Μ. , and Panousis, G., 2001. New technologies and old fears in the school system, Athens, Papazisi. Greece.
Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., and Sandholtz, J. H., 1991. Changes in teachers' beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Leadership, 48(8), 45-52.
Emvalotis, A., and Jimoyiannis, A., 1999. Teachers’ attitudes relative to Computer Science and the New Technologies in the Lyceum, In A. Jimoyiannis (Eds.), Panhellenic Conference “Computer Science and Education’’, Ioannina (in greek).
Ertmer, P. A., 2005. Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational technology research and development, 53(4), 25- 39.
Ertmer, P. A., and Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., 2010. Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., and Sendurur, P., 2012. Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59(2), 423-435.
Eteokleous, N., 2008. Evaluating computer technology integration in a centralized school system. Computers and Education, 51(2), 669-686.
Fragkouli, E., and Hammond, M., 2007. Issues in developing programmes to support teachers of philology in using information and communications technologies in Greek schools: a case study. Journal of In-Service Education, 33(4), 463-477.
Fives, H., and Gill, M. G., 2015. International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs. (Eds.). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Fives, H., Lacatena and Gerard, 2015. Teachers’ Beliefs About Teaching (and Learning). In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs (pp. 249-266). Routledge Taylor &Francis Group: New York and London.
Flanagan, L., and Jacobsen, M., 2003. Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 124-142.
Fullan, M., 2007. The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press (4th edition).
Galanouli G., Murphy C., and Gardner J., 2004. Teachers' perceptions of the effectiveness of ICT -competence training. Computers and Education, 43 (1-2), 63- 79.
George, D., and Mallery, P., 2003. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Georgiadou, Α., Κaskantami, Μ., and Μarneli, L., 2003. Formative assessment in service training programme in ICTs. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference, ICT’ s usein educational practice: educational softaware and internet. Syros, 2003 (in greek).
Giakoumatou, Τ., 2004. When Information Technology contacted with Philology. What we know five years later. Proceedings of the 2nd Panhellenic Conference “Information and Education”, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, 2004 (in greek).
Gialamas, V., and Nikolopoulou, K., 2010. In-Service and Pre-service Early Childhood Teachers’ Views and Intentions about ICT Use in Early Childhood Settings: A Comparative Study. Computers and Education 55(1), 333-341.
Giavrimis, P., Papastamatis, A., Valkanos, E. And Anastasiou, A., 2011. Informatics and Communication Technologies (ICT) and In-service Teachers’ Training. Review of European Studies, 3(1), 2-12.
Goufas. K., 2007. ICT and philologists: Attitudes, Opinions and Needs [Online]. Available: http://www.epyna.gr/~agialama/synedrio_syros_4/filologoi/207_Goufa.pdf
(in greek).
Gray, D. 2004. Doing Research in the Real World, 2nd eds., London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Greek School Network, https://www.sch.gr/english
Groenewald, T., 2004. A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42-55.
Gu, X., Zhu, Y., and Guo, X., 2013. Meeting the “digital natives”: Understanding the acceptance of technology in classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 392-402.
Guoyuan, S., Valcke, M., Van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., and Zhu, C., 2011. Predicting ICT integration into classroom teaching in Chinese primary schools: Exploring the complex interplay of teacher-related variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 160-172.
Hammond, M., 2002. Why Teach? A Case Study Investigating the Decision To Train To Teach ICT. Journal of Education for Teaching, 28 (2), 135-148.
Hinostroza, E., Rehbein, L., Mellar, H., and Preston, C., 2000. Developing educational software: a professional tool perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 5(2) 103-117.
Honey, M., and Moeller, B., 1990. Teachers' beliefs and technology integration: Different values, different understandings. Tech. Rep. No. 6. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
Houser, R., 2009. Counselling and educational research: Evaluation and application. Thousand. Oaks, CA: Sage.
Howard, S. K., and Mozejko, A., 2015. Teachers: technology, change and resistance. In M. Henderson, & G. Romeo (Eds.), Teaching and Digital Technologies Big Issues and Critical Questions (pp. 307-318). Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., and Lacity, M. C., 2006. A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1-23.
Jimoyiannis, A., and Komis, V., 2004. The study of Lyceum students’ representations of the computer data flow and the role of the basic computer units. In P. Politis (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Pan-Hellenic Conference “Didactics of Informatics” (pp. 73-85). Volos, Greece (in greek).
Jimoyiannis, A., and Komis, V., 2006. Exploring secondary education teachers' attitudes and beliefs towards ICT in education. Themes in Education, 7(2), 181-204.
Jimoyiannis A., and Komis V., 2007. Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 181- 204.
Johannesen, T., and Eide, E. M., 2000. The role of the student in the age of technology: will the role change with use of information- and communication technology in education? European Journal of Open and Distant Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2000/eide3/eide3.html
Jones, A., 2004. A Review of the Research Literature on Barriers to the Uptake οf ICT by Teachers, England: Becta, Version 1.
Kalogiannakis, M., 2010. Training with ICT for ICT from the trainer’s perspective. A Greek case study, Education and Information Technologies, 15(1), 3-17.
Kankaanranta, M., 2001. Constructing Digital Portfolios: Teachers Evolving Capabilities in the Use of Information and Communications Technology. Teacher Development, 5 (2), 259-75.
Karabinis, A., 2010. Evaluation and critical analysis of the results of Level-A Training for Philologists in schools of Attica for using ICT in the educational process. MA thesis. Patra: Hellenic Open University (in greek).
Karageorgos, D., 2001. Statistics: Descriptive and Inferential. Athens: Savallas (in greek).
Karsenti, T., Villeneuve, S. and Goyer, S., 2006. The impact of motivation on prospective teachers’ use of information and communication technologies (ICTs). In C. Crawford et al (Eds), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (pp. 1659-1666). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Κaskandami, Μ., 2006. Pedagogical use of presentation software in philologists’ training. Proceedings of the 5nd Panhellenic Conference “Information and Communication Technologies in Education’’, pp. 474-481, Thessaloniki (in greek).
Kazamias, A., 1990. The curse of sisyphus in Greek educational reform: A socio-political and cultural interpretation. Modern Greek Studies Yearbook, 6, 33-53.
King P. K., 2002. Educational Technology Professional Development as Transformative Learning Opportunities. Computers & Education, 39, 283-297.
Kiridis, A., Drossos, V., and Tsakiridou, E., 2006. Teachers Facing ICT The Case of Greece. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 75-96.
Kokkinaki, A., 2010. Obstacles to the integration of ICTs in Primary Education in Greece. An investigation based on teachers’ perspectives. In: Interactive Conference on Computer Aided Learning (ICL 2010). Hasselt, Belgium, 15-17 September 2010.
Kontogiannopoulou-Polydorides, G., 1996. Educational Paradigms and Models of Computer Use does Technology Change Educational Practice? In Cross national policies and practices on computers in education (pp. 49-83). Netherlands: Springer.
Kynigos, P., Karageorgos, D., Vavouraki, A. and Gavrilis, K., 2001. The opinions of the teachers of “Odysseas” relative to the use of new technologies in education, In V. Komis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Panhellenic Conference “Information and Communication Technologies in Education’’, Patra (in greek).
Imtiaz, M. A., and Maarop, N., 2014. A review of technology acceptance studies in the field of education. Jurnal Teknologi, 69(2), 27-32.
Inan, F. A., and Lowther, D. L., 2010. Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154.
In- service Training of Teachers in the utilisation and application of ICTs in the teaching practice, http://b-epipedo2.cti.gr/en/
Lai, K.W., Pratt, K., and Trewern, A., 2001. Learning with technology: evaluation of the Otago secondary schools technology project. Dunedin: The Community Trust of Otago.
Li, L., 2014. Understanding language teachers’ practice with educational technology: A case from China. System, 46, 105-119.
Likert, R., 1932. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.
Lim, C. P., and Chan, B. C., 2007. MicroLESSONS in teacher education: Examining pre- service teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Computers & Education, 48, 474-494.
Ma, W., Anderson, R., and Streith, K., 2005. Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 387-395.
Maistros, I., 2010. Social Consequences of ICT – Consequences in Education. Proceedings, 2nd Panhellenic Conference: Integration and use of ICT in Educational Process (pp.475-484). Patra, 28-30 April, 2011 (in greek).
Makrakis, V., 2002. Information and communication technologies in the United Arab Emirates education: A national teacher survey, Interim Report, Ministry of Education.
Makrakis, V., 2008. An instructional design module of ICT that empowers teachers to integrate education for sustainable development across the curriculum. In C. Angeli, and N. Valanides (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Panhellenic Conference with International Participation on Information and Communication Technologies in Education: 1 (pp. 391-398). Nicosia: University of Cyprus.
Margerum-Leys, J. and Marx, R. W., 2002. Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A study of student-mentor pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427-462.
Matos, A., and Chronaki, A., 2009. Philologists are considered to be non-practical but what about mathematicians? Cultures in specialties and ICT [Online]. Available: http://www.etpe.gr/extras/view_proceedings.php?conf_id=24 (in greek)
Michalopoulou, K., 1992. Scales of Attitude Measurement. Athens: Odysseas (in greek).
Mishra, P., and Koehler, M. J., 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Nikolopoulou, K., 2014. Educational Software Use in Kindergarten. In Research on e- Learning and ICT in Education: Technological, Pedagogical and Instructional Perspectives, edited by C. Karagiannidis, P. Politis, and I. Karasavvidis, 39-57. New York: Springer.
Nikolopoulou, K., and Gialamas, V., 2015. Barriers to the Integration of Computers in Early Childhood Settings: Teachers’ Perceptions. Education and Information Technologies 20(2), 285-301.
Nikolopoulou, K., and Gialamas, V., 2016. Barriers to ICT use in high schools: Greek teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(1), 59-75.
Nova-Kaltsouni, C., 2006. Methodology of empirical research in social studies. Athens: Gutenberg (in greek).
Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., and Papagianni, A., 2008. Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers and Education, 50(3), 1084-1091.
Pavlou, V., and Vryonides, M., 2009. Understanding factors that influence teachers’ technology acceptance and actual computer use for teaching; the case of Greece. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 14(2), 5-25.
Pelgrum, W., 2001. Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 37, 163-178.
Peralta, H., Costa, F.A., 2007. Teachers’ competence and confidence regarding the use of ICT. Educational Sciences Journal, 3, 75-84
Player-Koro, C., 2013. Hype, hope and ICT in teacher education: A Bernsteinian perspective. Learning, Media and Technology, 38 (1), 26-40.
Politis, P., Roussos, P., Karamanis, M., and Tsaousis, G., 2000. Evaluation of teachers’ training in the context of program “Odysseas”, in V Komis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Panhellenic Conference “Information and Communication Technologies in Education”, Patra (in greek).
Prawat R., 1996. Learning Community, Commitment And School Reform. Curriculum studies, 28(1), 91-110.
Reinen, J. I., and Plomp, T., 1993. Staff development as a condition for computer integration. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 19(2), 149-166.
Robson, C., 2002. Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner researchers, (2nd eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Robson, C., 2011. Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings (3rd edn). Chichester: John Wiley.
Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., and Tondeur, J., 2010. Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers and Education, 54(1), 103-112.
Sarkar, S., 2012. The role of information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education for the 21st century. The Science Probe, 1(1), 30-41.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., and Teo, T., 2015. Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computer and Education 88, 202-214.
Singh, A., 2017. Use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in education. International Journal of Education and Management Studies, 7(3), 323-325.
Snoeyink, R., and Ertmer, P., 2001. Thrust into technology: how veteran teachers respond. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(1), 85-111.
Straub, E. T., 2009. Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625-649.
Teo, T., 2011. Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers and Education, 57(4), 2432-2440.
Teo, T., and van Schaik, P., 2012. Understanding the Intention to Use Technology by Preservice Teachers: An Empirical Test of Competing Theoretical Models. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(3), 178-188.
Tikam, M. V., 2013. Impact of ICT on education. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development (IJICTHD), 5(4), 1-9.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P.A. and Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., 2016. Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Education Technology Research Development, 65(3), 555-575.
Tong, K.P., and Trinidad, S.G., 2005. Conditions and constraints of sustainable innovative pedagogical practices using technology. Journal of International Electronic for leadership in learning, 9(3), 1-27.
Tsakiri, E., 1991. Methodological problems in designing questionnaires for social researches: the sequence of questions. Review of social research, 80 (80), 11-32 (in greek).
Tsitouridou, M., and Vryzas, K., 2003. Early childhood education teachers’ attitudes towards computer and information technology: the case of Greece. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 187-207.
Tsoutsa, S., Kedraka, K., and Papastamatis, A., 2013. Secondary education Greek philologists as adult learners on ICT. Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences 2(2013), 47-54.
Tziafetas, K., Avgerinos, A., and Karakiza, T., 2013. Views of ICT Teachers about the Introduction of ICT in Primary Education in Greece. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(1), 200-209.
Uluyol, C., and Sahin, S., 2014. Elementary school teachers’ ICT use in the classroom and their motivators for using ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 65-75.
Van Braak, J., 2001. Factors influencing the use of computer mediated communication by teachers in secondary schools. Computers and Education, 36(1), 41-57.
Van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., and Valcke, M., 2004. Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(4), 407-422.
Vosniadou, S., and Kollias, V., 2001. Information and communication technology and the problem of a teacher training: Myths, dreams, and the harsh reality. Themes in Education, 4(2), 341-366.
Yildirim, S., 2007. Current Utilization of ICT in Turkish Basic Education Schools: A Review of Teacher's ICT Use and Barriers to Integration. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(2), 171-86.
Zanna, M. P., and Rempel, J. K., 1988. Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D.
Bar-Tel, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 315- 334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zaranis, N., Oikonomidis, V., and Linardakis, M., 2017. Factors Affecting Greek Kindergarten Teachers to Support or Oppose ICT in Education. In: Anastasiades P., Zaranis N. (Eds.). Research in e-Learning and ICT in Education: Technological, Pedagogical and Instructional Perspectives. Springer Science and Business, New York. 203-216.
Zetta, B., Papaconstantinou, S., and Apostolidis, G., 2009. Evaluating the B-level training for the use of ICT in educational process to philologists of Serres, Drama and Kavala (in greek).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2129
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Ilias Loumos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).