THE VIEWS OF STUDENTS ON PORTFOLIO IMPLEMENTATION IN TURKEY

Belgin Parlakyıldız

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to determine the views of the university students about the implementation process with 10 open ended questions. In this study, the case study of qualitative research designs was used. The study group of the study consisted of 25 female students who attended Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Education and participated in the "Planning and Evaluation in Teaching" course and in the process of portfolio evaluation. Portfolio training was given to the students by the researcher. The students continued their work by forming peer groups in groups of 2, 3, 4 and 5 for 10 weeks. The answers that the students gave to the 10 open ended questions were organized within specific themes. In the process of portfolio application, students are were asked following questions ‘’what they want to do, what they do, what they learn, where they are successful in the study and what difficulties they take, what points they will take care of when they do this work, which personal skills and professional skills they have gained from this work’’. The opinions and recommendations of the students regarding the portfolio application have been determined.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


portfolio, views of students, teaching planning and evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, R.S., and Demeulle, L. (1998). Portfolio Use in Twenty-Four Teacher Education Programs. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25 (1), 23- 32.

Aslanoğlu, Aslıhan. Erman. (2007). PIRLS 2001 Türkiye Verilerine Göre 4. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Okuduğunu Anlama Becerileriyle İlişkili Faktörler. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Ölçme ve Değerlendirme / Psikometri Programı.

Adams, Dennis M., and Hamm, Mary E. (1992). Portfolio Assessment and Social Studies: Collecting, Selecting, and Reflecting on what is Significant. Social Education, 56 (2), 103-105.

Atay, D. (2003). Öğretmen Adaylarına Yansıtmayı Öğretmek: Portfolyo Çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 9 (36), 508-527.

Bahçeci, D. (2006). Anotomi Dersinde Portfolyo Kullanmanın Öğrencilerin Bilişsel ve Duyuşsal Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Orta Öğretim Fen ve Matematik Alanlar Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.

Banta, Trudy. W. (2003). Introduction: Why Portfolios?. Portfolio Assessment Uses, Cases, Scoring, and Impact. Banta, Trudy. W. (Ed.). Published by Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint, San Francisco, 1-5.

Barton, J., and Collins, A. (1993). Portfolios in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 44 (3), 200-210.

Bekiroğlu, Ogan. (2006). Ölçme ve Değerlendirmede Alternatif Yöntemler ve Portfolyo Kullanımı. http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios.html..

Benjamin, Lorie. C. (2003). Portfolio Assessment: Benefits, Issues of Implementation, and Reflection on Its Use. Portfolio Assessment Uses, Cases, Scoring, and Impact. Banta, Trudy. W. (Ed.). Published by Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint, San Francisco, 11-15.

Birgin, Osman. (2006). İlköğretimde Portfolyo Değerlendirme Yönteminin Uygulanması Sürecinde Karşılaşılan Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri, 4-6 Eylül, I. Ulusal Matematik Eğitimi Öğrenci Sempozyumu, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.

Breault, R.A. (2004). Dissonant Themes in Pre-Service Portfolio Development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20 (8), 847-860.

Bolat, Hasan, Kayhan, Günay. (2004). Tümel Dosya Değerlendirme Sisteminin Almanca Öğretimi İçin İlköğretim Okullarında Uygulanması. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. (18), 52-58.

Büyüköztürk, Şener, Kutlu, Ömer, Doğan, Deha C. (2007). İlköğretim Öğretmenlerin Yeni Değerlendirme Yöntemlerine Yönelik Tutumlarını Etkileyen Faktörler. 16.Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, 5-7 Eylül 2007 Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Tokat, 112-117.

Calfee, R.C., and Perfumo, P. (1993). “Student Portfolios: Opportunities for a Revolution in Assessment.” Journal of Reading, 36, 532 537.

Cohen, P. A. (1995). Abolish Grades. Education Update, May, 37, 3.

Cole, D.J., Ryan, C.W., and Kick, F. (1995). Portfolios across the Curriculum and Beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Pres, 7-18.

Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd Edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.

Çeğindir, Y. Neşe. (2006). Giyim Eğitiminde Yeterliğe Dayalı Portfolyo Değerlendirme. Gazi Üniversitesi Mesleki Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1/1, Temmuz, 251-264.

Çelik, Fethi., Önal, Ali. S. (2003). Öğretimde Planlama ve Değerlendirme Dersi Öğretim Programının Değerlendirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (2). http://egitimdergi.pamukkale.edu.tr/.html .

Darling, L.F. (2001). Portfolio As Practice: The Narratives of Emerging Teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17 (1), 107-121.

Demirci, C. & Gümüş, N.. (2017). The Application of Active Learning Strategies in a Multicıltural Class. European Journal of Education Studies.4 (3), 172-187.

De Jong, R., Westerhof, K.J., and Creemers, B.P.M. (2000). Homework and Student Math Achievment in Junior High Schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6, 56-64.

Diez, M.E. (2001). Assessing Student Competence in Teacher Education Programs. In C.A. Palomba and T.W. Banta (Eds.), Assessing Student Competence in Accredited Disciplines: Pioneering Approaches to Assessment in Higher Education. Sterling. Va, Stylus, 29-48.

Doğan, C. Deha. (2005). İlköğretimde Öğretmen Öğrenci ve Velilerin Dosya Oluşturma (Portfolyo) Uygulamaları Hakkındaki Görüşleri Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ölçme ve Değerlendirme/Psikometri Bilim Dalı.

Dutt-Doner, K.M., Personett, C. (1997). Using Portfolio To Assess in an Undergraduate Teacher Education Course: What Did The Students and İnstructor Learn? Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, March 24- 28 ED: 410 247.

Dutt-Doner, K., Gilman, D. (1998). Students React to Portfolio Assessment. Contemporary Education, 69 (3), 159-166.

Ersoy, A. Figen. (2006). Öğretmen Adaylarının Gelişim Dosyasına Dayalı Değerlendirmeye İlişkin Görüşleri. Elementary Education Online, 5 (1), 85-95.

Gılkerson, D. and Hanson, F. M. (2000). Family Portfolios: Involving Families Portfolio Documentation. Early Childhood Education Journal, 27 (3), 197-201.

Groom, Barry and Maunonen-Eskelinen, Irmeli. (2006). The Use of Portfolios To Develop Reflective Practice in Teacher Training: A Comparative and Collaborative Approach Between Two Teacher Training Providers in The UK and Finland. Teaching in Higher Education, July, 11(3), 291-300 (10).

Hanson, M.F. and Gılkerson, D. (1999). Portfolio Assessment: More than ABC’s and 123 s. Early Childhood Education Journal, 27 (2), 81-86.

Hessler, A.C., and Kuntz, Susan. (2003). Student Portfolios: Effective Academic Advising Tools. Portfolio Assessment Uses, Cases, Scoring, and Impact. Banta, Trudy. W. (Ed.). Published by Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint, San Francisco, 30- 34.

Johnson, Andrew. P. (2000). It’s Time for Madeline to Go: A New Look at Lesson Plan Design. Action İn Teacher Education, 22(1), 72-78.

Kaptan, F., ve Korkmaz, H. ( 2000). Fen Öğretiminde Tümel (Portfolyo) Değerlendirme. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 212-220.

Klenowski, Valentina. (2001). Portfolio Assessment in Teacher Education. In Scott (Ed.), Curriculum and Assessment, Wesport, Conn: Ablex Publishing, 63-83.

Laurence, L.S.L. (2003). Low Motivation on Schools Teachers’ Construction of Teaching Portfolios. Curriculum and Teaching. 18 (2), 71-87.

Lambdin, D.V., and Walker, V.L. (1994). “Planning for Classroom Portfolio Assessment.” Arithmetic Teacher, 41, 318-324.

Mıller, M., and Daloz, L. (1989). Assessment of Prior Learning: Good Practices Assure Congruity Between Work and Education. Equity and Excellence, 24 (3), 30-34.

Morgil, İnci., Cingör, N., Erökten, S., Yavuz, S., ve Oskay, Ö.,Ö. (2004). Bilgisayar Destekli Kimya Eğitiminde Portfolyo Çalışmaları. The Turkısh Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET. April, 3 (2), Article 15, 105-119.

Mokhtari, K., Yellin, D., Bull, K, and Montgomery, D. (1996). Portfolio Assessment in Teacher Education: Impact on Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge and Attitudes. Journal of Teacher Education, 47 (4), 245-252.

Mullin, Joan. A. (1998). Portfolios: Purposeful Collections of Student Work. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. John Wiley, 74, 79-87.

Nılsen, B. (1997). Week By Week Plans For Observing and Recording Young Children. USA. Broome Community College: Thomson Publishing, 11-12.

Öztürk, E. (2004). Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitiminde Proje Tabanlı Öğrenme ve Portfolyo Değerlendirme Yaklaşımlarının Eğitim ve Sınama Durumlarına Yansıması. Yayımlanmamış Uzmanlık Tezi. Kafkas Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kars.

Paulson, F.L., Paulsen, P.R., and Meyer, C.A. (1991, February). What Makes a Portfolio?, Educational Leadership. 48 (5), 60-63.

Pekkanlı, İ. (2003). The Impact of The European language Portfolio on The Learner Autonomy of Turkish Primary School Students. Eskişehir: Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Rolheıser, C. and Schwartz, S. (2001). Pre-Service Portfolios: A Base for Professional Growth. Canadian Journal of Education, 26 (3), 283-300.

Ryan, Joseph M., and Kuhs, Therese M., (1993). Assessment of Preservice Teachers and the Use of Portfolios. Theory into Practice Assessing Tomorrow's Teachers, Spring, 32(2), 75-81.

Spence, W. and El-Ansari, W. (2004). Portfolio assessment: Practice Teachers’ Early Experience. Nurse Education Today, 24 (5), 388-401.

Spicuzza, Frank. J. (2003). An Evaluation of Portfolio Assessment: A Student Perspective. Portfolio Assessment Uses, Cases, Scoring, and Impact. Banta, Trudy. W. (Ed.). Published by Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint, San Francisco, 63-72.

Stahle, D.L., and Mitchell, J.P. (1993). “Portfolio Assessment in College Methods Course: Practicing What We Preach.” Journal of Reading, 36, 538-542.

Tezci, Erdoğan ve Dikici, A. (2004). Bireysel Gelişim Dosyasına Dayalı Değerlendirme Yaklaşımının Yaratıcı Düşünce Gelişimine Etkisi. XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, 6-9 Temmuz 2004, İnönü Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Malatya.

Ünal, S. (1991). Öğretim Yöntemlerinin Öğrenci Başarısı Üzerindeki Etkisi. Yaşadıkça Eğitim Dergisi, Ankara: (17), 8-12.

Valeri, G.M., Olson, J., and Deming, M.P. (1991). Portfolios: Collaborative Authentic Assessment Opportunities for College Developmental Learners. Journal of Reading, 35 (4), 298-304.

Viechnicki, K.J., Barbour, N., Shaklee, B., Rohrer, J., and Ambrose, R. (1993). “The Impact of Portfolio Assessment on Teacher Classroom Activities.” Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 371-377.

Vyortkına, D. (2003). Portfolio Assessment in Educational Leadership Programs at Master’s Level. (Ph.D Thesis, The Florida State Unıversity College Of Education) Dissertation Abstracts International, 1-338.

Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, 5. Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Wolf, Dennie. P. (1989). Portfolio Assessment: Sampling Student Work. Educational Leadership, 46 (7), 35-39.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2239

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Belgin Parlakyıldız

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).