CONCEPTUAL CHANGE ON THE LEARNING JOURNEY: FOUR ‘R’S FOR SUSTAINABLE LEARNING IN APPLIED CONTEXTS

Adrian Twissell

Abstract


Developing abstract conceptual knowledge is often problematic for learners because the phenomenon of interest cannot be observed. Knowledge is a product of learned theories and the outcome of learners’ practice. Through practice, such as the modelling and simulating of abstract phenomena, learners translate representations, for example diagrams and schematics into other forms such as physical models. Through this process conceptual change in the learner’s knowledge schema develops understanding and expertise enabling its application in new situations. This case study research explored learners’ perceptions of change in understanding during a two year General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) Design and Technology: Electronic Products course. The findings indicate that changes in conceptual understanding occur through the need to gradually engage with the practicalities of modelling and simulating the phenomena of interest. Learners were shown to adjust understanding from an initial theoretical focus, to a more pragmatic view of knowledge grounded in their own observations of simulated phenomena. Learners’ dispositional attitudes to learning were found to support the nature of learning activities encountered during the period of the research. The discussion concludes with a model of sustainable learning based around the four ‘R’s: relate, reinterpret, reflect and revise. The model describes specific learner actions proposed as necessary in support of the development of cognitive skills and learning autonomy within a conceptual change view of learning.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


conceptual change, sustainable learning, learning journey, procedural knowledge, learning disposition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A Conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations, Learning and Instruction, 16(3), pp. 183-198.

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency, American Psychologist, 37(2), pp. 122-147.

Bruner, J. (1977) The Process of Education, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Chen, Y., Pan, P., Sung, Y. and Chang, K. (2013). Correcting Misconceptions on Electronics: Effects of a simulation-based learning environment backed by a conceptual change model, Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), pp. 212-227.

Coffield, F. (2006). Learning styles. Literacy Today, 46, pp. 23-23.

Costa, A. & Kallick, B. (2002) Discovering and Exploring Habits of Mind. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Duit, R. and Treagust, D. F. (2010). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning, International Journal of Science Education, 25 (6), pp. 671-688.

Gainsburg, J., Rodriguez-Lluesma, C. and Bailey, D E. (2010). A “knowledge profile” of an engineering occupation: Temporal patterns in the use of engineering knowledge, Engineering Studies, 2 (3), pp. 197-219.

Harrison, A. G. and Treagust, D. F. (2001). Conceptual change using multiple interpretive perspectives: Two case studies in secondary school chemistry, Instructional Science, 29 (1), pp. 45-85.

Johnson, R. B. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come, Educational Researcher, 33(7), pp. 14-26.

Knapper, C. (2006) Lifelong learning means effective and sustainable learning. Reasons, ideas, concrete measures. 25th International Course on Vocational Training and Education in Agriculture. CIEA. Friday 25th August, pp. 1-10.

Kolb, D. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Kural, M. and Kocakulah, M. S. (2016). Teaching for hot conceptual change: Towards a new model, beyond the cold and warm ones, European Journal of Education Studies, 2(8), pp. 1-40.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lucas, B., Hanson, J. and Claxton, G. (2014) Thinking Like an Engineer: Implications for the education system. Project Report. Royal Academy of Engineering.

McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge, Internal Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, pp. 141-159.

Metioui, A. and Trudel, L. (2012). Acquiring Knowledge in Learning Concepts from Electrical Circuits: The Use of Multiple Representations in Technology-Based Learning Environments, Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 10(2), pp. 24-35.

New Wave Concepts (2012) Circuit Wizard (Version 1.50) [Computer Software]. Avaiable from: http://www.new-wave-concepts.com/ed/cw_files.html. [Accessed: 23rd June 2014].

Ozdemir, G. and Clark, D. B. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), pp. 351-361.

Piaget, J. (1955). The Construction of Reality in the Child (trans. Margaret Cook), New York: Basic Books. Available from: https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/piaget2.htm. [Accessed: 6th March 2015].

Pitcher, R. (2014). Getting the picture: The role of metaphors in teaching electronics theory, Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), pp. 397-405.

Siegler, R. S. (2005). Children’s Learning, American Psychologist, 60(8), pp. 769-778.

Solsona, N., Izquierdo, M. and de Jong, O. (2003). Exploring the development of students’ conceptual profiles of chemical change, International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), pp. 3-12.

Resnick, L. (1999). Making America Smarter. Education Week Century Series. 18(40), 38– 40.

Thomas, G. (2011) How to do your case study, London: Sage.

Thomas, G. (2013) How to do Your Research Project, London: Sage.

Twissell, A. (2018). Modelling and Simulating Electronics Knowledge: Conceptual Understanding and Learning through Active Agency. Educational Technology & Society, 21 (2), 111–123.

VanWynsberghe, R. and Khan, S. (2007). Redefining Case Study, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2), pp. 80-94.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in Education. In Husen, T. and Postlethwaite, T. N. (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Education, Supplement Vol. 1, Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2287

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Adrian Twissell

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).