THE ROLE OF TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE IN NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY OF VILLAGE COMMUNITIES IN EASTERN PART OF BOTSWANA

Mphemelang Joseph Ketlhoilwe, Koketso Jeremiah

Abstract


Traditional knowledge on local biodiversity has sustained traditional economies for centuries across the world. While it is threatened by modern ecological knowledge, it remains very important in some regions, especially among poor communities in both less developed and industrialized nations. Among such communities, it is valued and treasured at varying extent throughout the year. In other communities, it is valued and utilized in seasonal livelihoods. It is therefore, treasured and passed from one generation to the next. In some cases, it almost competes with modern technological or scientific knowledge on the use and management of biodiversity. This case study is based on a research conducted in the Eastern part of Botswana among 14 villages where knowledge of species of edible and medicinal plants remains relevant. The researchers used observations, individual interviews and focus group discussions to generate data over a period of twenty months. It became apparent that local ecological knowledge is still valued, especially by poor people, who use it to enhance their wellbeing and to protect biodiversity. Some respondents said they value it since they are beneficiaries of those who possess it since they need and utilize the products sold by those who still have a wealth of knowledge of local biodiversity. Other respondents felt it (local knowledge) was as valuable as modern scientific knowledge and suggested that it should be legislated and taught in schools as it is slowly eroded or disappearing. This paper recommends the sustenance of the existing traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) while reconstructing it in preparation for curriculum development. The paper recommends that further research be carried out to document the type or nature of people who are TEK holders, the methods they use to manage and utilize local biodiversity products, the extent of success of their practices, up-to-date contacts of these people (communication channels) and suggest a policy to develop enabling social and economic conditions within which TEK practitioners work.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), biodiversity, natural resources management, Botswana

References


Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. Los Angeles: Sage

Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in Education. Sixth Edition. London: Routledge

Couze, V., and Featherstone, M. (2006). Modernity. Theory, culture and society. 23(2-3): 457 -465.

Gapor, Daud, Said and Krishnan (2013). RCE Penang: Traditional medicine, biodiversity and health in rural communities. In Payyappallimana, U. and Fadeeva, Z. (Eds). Traditional knowledge and biodiversity. Yokohama: United Nations University. Pp58-63

Hyde, M.A., Wursten, B. T., Ballings, P., and Coates Palgrave, M. (2015). Flora of Zimbabwe: Species information: Orthanthera jasminiflora. http://www.zimbabweflora.co.zw/speciesdata/species.php?species_id=146120, retrieved 1 December, 2015.

Ketlhoilwe M.J and Jeremiah, K (2014) Developing Capability and Agency through a poverty reduction Approach to Community Education and Sustainability in Botswana. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education. Vol. 29. Pp14 – 30

Payyappallimana, U., Fadeeva, Z and O’Donoghue, R. (2013). Traditional knowledge and biodiversity within regional centres of expertise on education for sustainable development. In Payyappallimana, U. and Fadeeva, Z. (Eds). Traditional knowledge and Biodiversity. Yokohama: United Nations University. Pp8 -21

Shava, S. (2013). The representation of indigenous knowledges. In Stevenson, B.R.; Brody, M., Dillon, J., and Wals, A.E.J. International handbook of research on environmental education. New York: Routledge for AERA.

United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. (1992). Treaty on environmental education for sustainable societies and global responsibility. The NGO Forum Alternative Treaties. Rio de Janeiro: UNCED.

Wiersma, W. and Jurs, S. 2005. Research methods in education: An introduction. 8th edition. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.232

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Mphemelang Joseph Ketlhoilwe, Koketso Jeremiah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2022. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).