Billy A. Danday, Sheryl Lyn C. Monterola


This study probed the effects of the Multiple-Representation Lesson Study (MRLS) on the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) of pre-service Physics teachers using a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design. The participants of the study were 18 fourth year BSED Physical Science majors who were randomly assigned to either experimental or comparison group. The experimental group composed of nine practice teachers was exposed to MRLS while the other nine participants from the comparison group implemented the Traditional Instructional Planning Approach (TIPA). Four knowledge domains of the TPCK framework were investigated – the technological knowledge (TK), pedagogical knowledge (PK), content knowledge (CK), and the overall technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Data were gathered from multiple sources such as researcher-made written tests, teaching observations, pre-service teachers’ outputs, interviews, journal entries, and field notes. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to analyze statistical difference between the experimental and the comparison group. Results revealed significant differences between the two groups in certain knowledge domains. Findings indicate beneficial effects of the MRLS in instructional practices, particularly in developing pre-service teachers’ TPCK. Based on the results, it is strongly recommended that MRLS be integrated in the pre-service teacher education and have its effects examined on other knowledge domains.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



lesson study, TPCK, TPACK, multiple representations, instructional planning

Full Text:



Ainsworth, S. (2006). Deft: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Elsevier: Learning and Instruction 16, 183-198.

Akkus, O., & Cakiroglu, E. (2009). The effects of multiple representations-based instruction on seventh grade students' algebra performance. Lyon, France: INRP.

Alev, N., Karal-Eyuboglu, I., & Yigit, N. (2012). Examining pre-service physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) with Web 2.0 through designing teaching activities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 5040 – 5044.

Alias, S., & Ibrahim, F. (2013). Difficulties in learning for solving problem of space-time special relativity. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(5), 280-284.

Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ø., Henriksen, E. K., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils' and teachers' view of physics and physics teaching. Sci Ed, 88, 683 - 706.

Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.

Bal, A. (2015). Skills of using and transform multiple representations of the prospective teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 582-588.

Banerjee, B. (2010). The effects of diagramming as a representational technique on high school students' achievement in solving math word problems. Published Dissertation. Ann Arbor, Michigan: UMI Dissertation Publishing.

Barrett, D., Riggs, L., & Ray, J. (2013). Teachers’ collaborative use of the lesson study approach to foster student achievement in Geometry. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 1188-1192.

Cairncross, S., & Mannion, M. (2001). Interactive multimedia and learning: Realizing the benefits. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 156-164.

Cajkler, W., Wood, P., Norton, J., Pedder, D., & Xu, H. (2015). Teacher perspectives about lesson study in secondary school departments: a collaborative vehicle for professional learning and practice development. Research Papers in Education, 192-213.

Cavin, R. (2007). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teachers through microteaching lesson study. Published Dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Information and Learning Center/UMI.

Ceppi-Bussmann, S. (2006). A case study of a technology professional development program involving lesson study on teachers' perceptions of their professional practice. Published Dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI, ProQuest Information and Learning Company.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13 (4), 63–73.

Chang, Y., Tsai, M.-F., & Jang, S.-J. (2014). Exploring ICT use and TPACK of science teachers in two contexts. US-China Education Review A, 4(5), 298-311.

Chew, C., & Lim, C. (2013). Developing pre-service teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge for teaching mathematics with the geometer's sketchpad through lesson study. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 1-8.

Choy, D., Wong, A., Lim, K., & Chong, S. (2013). Beginning teachers' perceptions of their pedagogical knowledge and skills in teaching: A three-year study. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5); 68-79.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cox, S. (2008). A conceptual analysis of the technological pedagogical content knowledge. Published Dissertation. Ann Arbor: Proquest LLC/UMI.

De Cock, M. (2012). Representation use and strategy choice in physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 020117-1 - 020117-15.

Elipane, L. (2012). Integrating the essential elements of lesson study in pre-service mathematics teacher education. Copenhagen: Department of Science Education, Copenhagen University.

Erinosho, S. (2013). How do students perceive the difficulty of physics in secondary school? An exploratory study in Nigeria. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 1510-1515.

Ervin, L. (2014). Assessing student learning with teachnology: A descriptive study of technology-using teacher practice and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Published Dissertation. Ann Arbor: ProQuest LCC/UMI.

Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 393-405.

Fritz, C., Morris, P., & Richler, J. (2012). Effect Size Estimates: Current Use, Calculations, and Interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 141, No. 1, 2–18.

Gulkilik, H., & Arikan, A. (2012). Preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ views about using multiple representations in mathematics instruction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1751-1756.

Gurl, T. (2009). An analysis of an adaptation of lesson study with preservice secondary mathematics teachers. Published Dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest LLC/UMI.

Gutierez, S. (2015). Collaborative professional learning through lesson study: Identifying the challenges of inquiry-based teaching. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 118-134.

Haley-Mize, S. (2011). The effect of instructional methodology on pre-service educators' level of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest LLC/UMI.

Hightower, A., Delgado, R., Lloyd, S., Wittenstein, R., Sellers, K., & Swanson, C. (2011). Improving student learning by supporting quality teaching: Key issues, effective strategies. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education, Inc.

Hixon, M. (2009). Lesson study: A proposed intervention for professional development and student achievement. Published Dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Publising, ProQuest LLC.

Knowles, M. (1973). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.

Knowles, M. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company.

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 131-152.

Koehler, M., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education , 13-19.

Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. East Lansing, MI: Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia. Retrieved from Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia:

Kolenda, R. (2007). Japanese lesson study, staff development, and science education reform - The Neshaminy story. Science Educator, 29-33.

Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. (1999). Students' use of imagery in solving qualitative problems in kinematics. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC).

Leigh, G. (2004, March). Developing multi-representational problem solving skills in large, mixed-ability physics classes. Retrieved November 5, 2015, from

Lewis, C. (2002). Does lesson study have a future in the united states? Nagoya Journal of Education and Human Development, 1-23.

Lewis, C., & Perry, R. (2006). Professional development through lesson study: Progress and challenges in the U.S. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 89-106.

Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2004). A deeper look at lesson study. Educational Leadership, 18-22.

Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: a theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 285-304.

Lucenario, J., Yangco, R., Punzalan, A., & Espinosa, A. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge-guided lesson study: Effects on teacher competence and students’ achievement in Chemistry. Education Research International, 1-9.

Mayer, R. (n.d.). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Retrieved February 21, 2018 from Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Core:

McDowell, A. (2010, June). Preservice teachers’ use of lesson study in teaching Nature of Science. Retrieved January 26, 2016, from Scholar Works @Georgia State University:

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 1017-1054.

Mitcheltree, M. (2006). Exploring lesson study as a form of professional development for enriching teacher knowledge and classroom practices. Published Dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Information and Learning Company/UMI.

Morrison, A., & Luttenegger, K. (2015). Measuring pedagogical content knowledge using multiple points of data. The Qualitative Report, (6) 804-816.

Nguyen, D., & Rebello, N. (2009). Students' difficulties in transfer of problem solving across representations. Physics Education Research Conference (pp. 221-224). Ann Arbor, MI: American Institute of Physics.

Niess, M. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education 21 , 509–523.

Ogunleye, A. (2009). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of students’ problem-solving difficulties in physics: Implications for remediation. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 85-90.

Ozmantar, M., Akkoc, H., Bingolbali, E., Demir, S., & Ergene, B. (2010). Pre-service mathematics teachers' use of multiple representations in technology-rich environments. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 19-36.

Ozturk, I. (2012). Wikipedia as a teaching tool for technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) development in pre-service history teacher education. Educational Research and Review, 7(7), 182-191.

Quilario, K. (2014). Biology modelling-based lesson study: Effects on teacher self-efficacy and student critical thinking. Diliman, Quezon City: Unpublished Master's Thesis, UP College of Education.

Rock, T. C., & Wilson, C. (2005). Improving teaching through lesson study. Teacher Education Quarterly, 77-92.

Sadler, P., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. (2013). The influence of teachers' knowledge on student learning in middle school Physical Science classrooms. American Education Research Journal , 1020-1049.

Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Snetinova, M., & Koupilova, Z. (2012). Students’ difficulties in solving physics problems. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of Doctoral Students Part III (pp. 93-97). Prague: Matfyzpress.

Soong, B., Mercer, N., & Er, S. (2009). Students’ difficulties when solving physics problems: Results from an ICT-infused revision intervention. 17th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 361-365). Hong Kong: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.

Tchoshanov, M., Lesser, L., & Salazar, J. (2008). Teacher knowledge and student achievement: Revealing patterns. NCSM Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 39-49.

Teele, S., Maynard, D., & Marcoulides, G. (2015). The lesson study process - An effective intervention to reduce the achievement gap. US-China Education Review, 229-243.

Terpstra, M. (2009). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge: preservice teachers' perceptions of how they learn to use educational technology in their teaching. Published Dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest LLC/UMI.

Tokmak, H., Yelken, T., & Konokman, G. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions on development of their IMD competencies through TPACK-based activities. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (2), 243–256.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Billy A. Danday, Sheryl Lyn C. Monterola

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2022. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).