Panagiotis Pantidos


The main idea expressed in this paper is that scientific concepts, as teaching objects, are invested with meaning through epistemic, cognitive and semiotic significations. It is described how the concept of sound is presented through: a) the various scientific and non-scientific fields in which sound constitutes an object of study and research, b) the students’ personal formation of knowledge and c) the modes that sound can be represented in the material world. Such an approach allows us to define the structure elements used in the teaching of concepts and phenomena even before these become active teaching objects. This seems to be useful in lesson planning, in the training of pre-service and in-service science teachers, as well as in curricula design.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



epistemic, cognitive, semiotic significations, sound

Full Text:



Abrahamson, D. (2009). Embodied design: constructing means for constructing meaning, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 27 –47.

Alibali, M. W., Bassok, M., Solomon, K. D., Syc, S.E. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture, Psychological Science, 10, 327-333.

Aristotle. On The Soul, book II. Available at: http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/a8so/book2.html [Accessed 3 May 2018].

Aristotle. On The Heavens, book II. Available at: http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/heavens/book2.html [Accessed 27 Jul. 2018].

Asoko, H. M., Leach, J. & Scott, P. H. (1991). A study of students’ understanding of sound 5-16 as an example of action research. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British educational research association at Roehampton institute, London.

Chachlioutaki, M-E, Pantidos, P., & Kampeza, M. (2016). Changing semiotic modes indicates the introduction of new elements in children’s reasoning: the case of earthquakes. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair, 3(2), 198–208.

Colorado PhET simulations, Sound. Available at: http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/legacy/sound [Accessed 4 Oct. 2018].

Doppler Effect. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvWxhhi0_yk [Accessed 9 Sep. 2018]

Driver, R., Guesne, E. & Tiberghien, A. (eds.) (1985). Children’s Ideas in Science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Emery, L. & Morriss, R. (1986). “Kinesone I”: A kinetic sound sculpture. Leonardo, 19(3), 207-210.

Eshach, H. & Schwartz, L. J. (2006). Sound stuff? Naïve materialism in middle-school students’ conceptions of sound. International Journal of Science Education, 28(7), 733-764.

Eugenides Foundation, Sound Waves. Available at: http://www.eugenfound.edu.gr/frontoffice/popup.asp?cpage=cdog&oid=122 [Accessed 4 May 2012].

Eugenides Foundation, Virtual Percussion Instruments. Available at: http://www.eugenfound.edu.gr/frontoffice/portal.asp?cpage=NODE&cnode=285 [Accessed 4 Apr. 2012].

Givry, D. & Tiberghien, A. (2012). Studying students’ learning processes used during physics teaching sequence about gas with networks of ideas and their domain of applicability. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 223-249.

Halliday, D. & Resnick, R. (1966). Fundamentals of Physics. London, Sydney: Wiley (Greek edition).

Hawkins, J. & Pea, D. R. (1987). Tools for bridging the cultures of everyday and scientific thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 291-307.

Hapkiewicz, A. (1999). Naïve ideas in Earth science. MSTA Journal, 44(2), 26-30. Available at: http://www.msta-mich.org [Accessed 23 Oct. 2012].

Hewitt, P. (2012). Conceptual Physics: The Doppler Effect. [video] Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3MkZjlacaI [Accessed 11 Aug. 2012].

Impedovo, M. A., Delserieys-Pedregosa, A., Jégou, C., & Ravanis, K. (2017). Shadow formation at preschool from a socio-materiality perspective. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 579-601.

IYPT 2019 Problem 5 Filling Up a Bottle Demonstration. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I_cvSbz2l4 [Accessed 6 Jul. 2019].

Kampas, K. (2003). I Fysike sten Yperesia tis Technis [Physics in the Service of Art]. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press (in Greek).

Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J. & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal Teaching and Learning - The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London and New York: Continuum.

Lautrey, J. & Mazens, K. (2004). Is children’s naïve knowledge consistent? A comparison of the concepts of sound and heat. Learning and Instruction, 14, 399-423.

Mazens, K. & Lautrey, J. (2003). Conceptual change in physics: children’s naïve representations about sound. Cognitive Development, 18, 159-176.

Moro, L., Mortimer, E. F., & Tiberghien, A. (2019). The use of social semiotics multimodality and joint action theory to describe teaching practices: two cases studies with experienced teachers. Classroom Discourse, 1-23.

Parker, S. (ed.). (1997). McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Physics, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.

Pantidos, P., Valakas, K., Vitoratos, E. & Ravanis, K. (2010). The materiality of narrative spaces: a theatre semiotics perspective into the teaching of physics. Semiotica, 182-1/4, 305-325.

Pantidos, P. (2017). Narrating science in the classroom: the role of semiotic resources in evoking imaginative thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(4), 388-401.

Pasithea. cti.gr, (2011). Pasithea. Available at: http://pasithea.cti.gr/physics [accessed 4 Oct. 2011].

Plato. The Republic, Book 3. Available at: http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/p/plato/p71r/book03.html#book03 [Accessed 30 Jun. 2013].

Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. & Roth, W.-M. (2010). Staging & Performing Scientific Concepts: Lecturing is Thinking with Hands, Eyes, Body & Signs. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Ravanis, K., Koliopoulos, D. & Boilevin, J. M. (2008). Construction of a precursor model for the concept of rolling friction in the thought of preschool age children: a socio-cognitive teaching intervention. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 421-434.

Ravanis, K., Christidou, V. and Hatzinikita, V. (2013). Enhancing conceptual change in preschool children’s representations of light: a sociocognitive approach. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 1-20.

Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H. and Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naïve physics reasoning: a commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction 18(1), 1–34.

Roth, W-M. and Lawless, D. (2002). Scientific investigations, metaphorical gestures, and the emergence of abstract scientific concepts. Learning and Instruction 12, 285-304.

Smith, P. J., diSessa, A. A. and Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/index.html

The First Philosophers: The Presocratics and the Sophists (2000). Robin Waterfield: translations, introductions, notes, Oxford University Press (Oxford World’s Classics).

Tselfes, V., & Paroussi, A. (2009). Science and theatre education: a cross-disciplinary approach of scientific ideas addressed to student teachers of early childhood education. Science & Education, 18(9), 1115-1134.

Van der Jagt, P. (1994). Bottoms up Doorbell. Athens: Benaki Museum.

Watt, D. and Russel, T. (1990). Sound. Primary SPACE project research report. Liverpool University Press.

(2009). David Byrne: Playing the building. Archit J, 230(7), 42.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Panagiotis Pantidos

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).