ATTITUDES AND PERCEPTIONS OF PEDAGOGICAL FORMATION PHYSICAL EDUCATION STUDENTS ABOUT WEB 2.0 TOOLS AND FACTORS FOR SUCCESSFUL ADAPTATION OF THESE TOOLS

Kürşat Arslan

Abstract


Today, use of the Web 2.0 technologies and applications (e.g. text messaging, wikis, personal web pages, social networks, blogs) in many different areas of education have been increasing, and this can be seen as an important development. However, teaching candidates from specific subject matters, such as physical education, still appear unaware of the potential benefits of such tools in a teaching and learning environment. The purpose of this study was to assess pre-service teachers’ perceptions about Web 2.0 technologies and to explore the awareness of this technology among students using the Technology Acceptance Modal (TAM). In this context, the descriptive survey method was used and a questionnaire was applied to 79 pre-service students (53 male and 26 female) enrolled in the physical education department in Dokuz Eylul University. The data for this study was collected by the researcher through a questionnaire after 2017-2018 fall semester of the course including weekly web 2.0 activities based on the lesson topic. The results of the study indicate that gender was an important factor that affected the implementation or use of this technology. Accordingly, male students had higher levels of awareness about web 2.0 applications than female students had. The study also showed that usefulness and ease-of-use are two significant factors that affect students’ attitude towards this technology.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


web 2.0, physical education, technology integration, perceptions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahuja, M. K. (2002). Women in the information technology profession: a literature review, synthesis and research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 11,20–34.

Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The internet and higher education, 11(2), 71-80.

Albion, P. R. (2008). Web 2.0 in teacher education: Two imperatives for action. Computers in the Schools, 25(3/4),

Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall, C. G., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition (pp. 1-60). The New Media Consortium.

Chapman, C., & King, R. (2009). Differentiated assessment strategies: One tool doesn’t fit all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., Ramdani, B., Niranjan, S., & Weerakkody, V. (2011, June). Understanding factors for successful adoption of web 2.0 applications. In ECIS (p. 263).

Exter, K., Rowe, S., Boyd, W., & Lloyd, D. (2012). Using Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative learning in distance education - case studies from an Australian university. Future Internet, 4, 216–237.

Franklin, T., & van Harmelen, M. (2007). Web 2.0 for content for learning and teaching in higher education. Bristol: JISC - The Joint Information Systems Committee.

Genç, Z. (2010). Web 2.0 yeniliklerinin eğitimde kullanımı: Bir Facebook eğitim uygulama örneği. Akademik Bilişim, 10, 10-12.

Hao, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2015a). Teachers’ concern about integrating Web 2.0 technologies and its relationship with teacher characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 1–8.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.

Hsu, Y.-C., Ching, Y.-H., & Grabowski, B. L. (2014). Web 2.0 applications and practices for learning through collaboration. In M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 747–758). New York: Springer.

Huang, W. H. D., Hood, D. W., & Yoo, S. J. (2013). Gender divide and acceptance of collaborative Web 2.0 applications for learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 57–65.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94–102

Moore, G. & Benbasat, I. (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2, 173–191.

Moore, J. A. & Chae, B. (2007).Beginning teachers' use of online resources and communities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(2), 215-224.

Morris, R. D. (2011). Web 3.0: Implications for online learning. Tech Trends, 55, 43.

Quadri, L. K. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions and attitudes toward the implementation of Web 2.0 tools in secondary education (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University). (UMI No. 3611469).

Rogers P. L. (2000) Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. J Educ Comput Res 22:455–472. doi: 10.2190/4UJE-B6VW-A30N-MCE5.

Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring pre-service teachers' beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Computers & Education, 59(3), 937-945.

Simkins, M., & Schultz, R. (2010). Using Web 2.0 tools at school. Leadership, 39(3), 12-38.

Usluel, Y. K., Mumcu, F. K., & Demiraslan, Y. (2007). Öğrenme-öğretme sürecinde bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri: Öğretmenlerin entegrasyon süreci ve engelleriyle ilgili görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(32), 164-178.

Usluel, Y. K., Mumcu-Kuşkaya, F., & Demiraslan, Y. K. (2007). Öğrenme-öğretme sürecinde bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri: Öğretmenlerin entegrasyon süreci ve engelleriyle ilgili görüşleri. H.Ü Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 164–179.

Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2004). Predicting Consumer Intentions to Use On-line Shopping: The Case for an Augmented Technology Acceptance Model, Information & Management, 41, 747–762.

Wesch, M. (2009). From knowledgeable to knowledge-able: Learning in new media environments. Retrieved from http://www.academiccommons.org

Yusop, F. D. (2015). A dataset of factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies in future teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 1075–1080.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2635

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Kürşat Arslan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).