MOTIVATION ET INTÉRÊT DES ÉLÈVES DE COLLÈGE MAROCAIN POUR L’APPRENTISSAGE DES SCIENCES PHYSIQUES / MOTIVATION AND INTEREST OF MOROCCAN COLLEGE STUDENTS FOR THE LEARNING OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES
Abstract
L’objectif de cet article est d’étudier de manière exploratoire certains facteurs motivationnels pouvant susciter l’intérêt des élèves de secondaire collégial (15-16 ans) pour l'apprentissage des sciences physiques. La méthodologie adoptée consiste à administrer aux enseignants et élèves deux questionnaires, et analyser les réponses recueillies. Les résultats obtenus montrent qu’aussi bien les élèves que les enseignants s’accordent sur l’existence d’un désintérêt pour les sciences physiques, et sur la participation faible et timide des élèves dans la réalisation des activités expérimentales. Cependant les élèves et les enseignants ont deux visions antagonistes sur la difficulté des sciences physiques ; les enseignants considèrent ces sciences difficiles pour les élèves, alors que ceux-ci ne sont pas tout à fait d’accord avec leurs enseignants sur ce point. Aussi, les élèves préfèrent le travail du groupe qui n’est plus encouragé par la plus part des enseignants.
The purpose of this article is to explore some motivational factors that may entrain the interest of to collegial school pupils (15-16 years old) for learning the physical sciences. The methodology consists in administering to teachers and pupils two questionnaires, and analyzing the answers collected. The results show that both pupils and teachers agree on the lack of interest in the physical sciences, and on the weak and timid participation of pupils in the performance of experimental activities. However, pupils and teachers have two opposing views on the difficulty of the physical sciences; teachers consider these sciences difficult for pupils, while pupils do not completely agree with their teachers on this point. Also, pupils prefer working in group, which is no longer encouraged by most teachers.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barnier, G. (2002). Théories de l’apprentissage et pratiques d’enseignement.
Boyer, R. et Tiberghien, A. (1989). Opinion de professeurs et d’élèves sur l’enseignement des sciences physiques au lycée. Bulletin de l’Union des Physiciens, 712, 305-321.
Baldwin, J.; Ebert-May, D.; Burns, D. (1999). The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for non-majors. Science Education, 83, 397–408.
Black, A. E.; Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740 –756.
Braxton J. M., Milem J. F., and Sullivan A.S. The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto’s Theory. The Journal of Higher Education, 2000; 71(5): 569–590.
Breakwell, G. M., & Beardsell, S. (1992). Gender parental and peers influences upon science attitudes and activities. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 183-197.
Bryan, R. R.; Glynn, S. M.; Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, Achievement, and Advanced Placement Intent of High School Students Learning Science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049-1065.
Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Madison, WI: McGraw Hill.
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (2000). Distance learning requires more/different motivation, Contemporary Education psychology: 25.
De Vries, E. (2001). Les logiciels d'apprentissage: panoplie ou éventail ? Revue française de pédagogie, 137. 105-116.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95 (2), 256-273.
Eccles, J. S., Simpkins, S. D. et Davis-Kean, P. E. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70-83.
El Moussaouy, A., Errahmani A. et Abderbi, J. (2015). Situations contextuelles dans l’enseignement de physique au lycée. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 9 (2), 65-78.
Gauthier, D., Garnier, C., et Marianacci, L. (2005). Les représentations sociales de l’enseignement et de l’apprentissage de la science et de la technologie d’élèves et d’enseignants du secondaire. Journal International sur les Représentations Sociales, 2 (1), 20-32.
Griffard, P. B. & Wandersee, J. H. (1999). Challenges to meaningful learning in African-American females at an urban science high school. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 611-632.
Giuseppin, M. (1996). Place et rôle des activités expérimentales en sciences physiques. Didaskalia, 9, 107-118.
Haydel, A. M. (2003). Using cognitive analyses to understand motivational and situational influences in science achievement. Communication présentée à “Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association”, Chicago, IL, April 2003. Accessible à http://ctl.sri.com/publications/downloads/AERA_cog_analys.pdf le 01-02-2006.
Kane, S. (2005). Former des enseignants à l’élargissement des enjeux d’apprentissage en travaux pratiques de physique et chimie: deux axes à articuler. Didactique, 99, 1181-1192.
Kozanitis A. La relation pédagogique au collégial: une alliée vitale pour la création d’un climat de classe propice à la motivation et à l’apprentissage. Pédagogie collégiale, 2015 ; 28(4) : 4-9.
Kranjc, T. (2011). Simulations as a complement and a Motivation element in the teaching of Physics. Metodicki obzori, 6(12), 175-187.
Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan (Eds.), the handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405–427). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Krapp, A., and Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50.
Lee, O., Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-grade science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 585–610.
Legendre, R. (1983). L'éducation totale. Paris : Nathan.
Lyons, T. (2004). Choosing physical science courses: the importance of cultural and social capital in the enrolment decisions of high achieving students. Communication à l‘International Organisation for Science and Technology Education, XI Symposium, Lublin: Poland, 25-30 July 2004. Accessible le 01-02-2006 à l’adresse http://www-ra.phys.utas.edu.au/IOSTE_XI_Lyons.doc.
Maarouf, A. et Benyamna, S. (1997). La construction des sciences physiques par les représentations et les erreurs : cas des phénomènes magnétiques. Didaskalia, 11, 103-120.
Myers, R. E., & Fouts, J. T. (1992). A cluster analysis oh high school science classroom environments and attitude towards science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 977-937.
Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupil’s and Parent’s Views of the Science Curriculum: a focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467.
Palmer, D. (2005). A Motivational View of Constructivist-informed Teaching, International Journal of Science Education. 27(15), 1853-1881.
Porchet, M. (2002). Les jeunes et les études scientifiques: les raisons de la «désaffection». Un plan d’action.
Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1991). Students multiples words: negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school culture. Anthropology and Education Quaterly, 22, 224-250.
Programme National d’Evaluation des Acquis des élèves du tronc commun (PENA). Rapport analytique. Conseil supérieur de l’éducation de la formation et de la recherche scientifique, Maroc. 2016. Available on: http://www.csefrs.ma/pdf/PNEA2016/Rapport%20PNEA%202016%20FR%20Final.pdf
Provasnik S., Malley L., Stephens M., Landeros K., Perkins R., and Tang J. H. Highlights From TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced 2015. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, November 2016. Available on: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017002.pdf.
Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. A. (2003). Gender and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 509-536.
Roorda D. L., Koomen H. M. Y., Spilt J. L., and Oort F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research; 81(4): 493–529.
Roxin, I. (2003). Multimédia et Web sémantique au service de l’apprentissage (Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université de Franche-Comté, France).
Rutherford, F. J. and Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Sanfeliz, M.; Stalzer, M. (2003). Science motivation in the multicultural classroom. The Science Teacher, 70(3), 64-66.
Schiefele, U. Situational and Individual Interest. In: Wentzel K., and Wigfield A., editors. Handbook of Motivation at School. New York: NJ Routledge; 2009. p. 197-222.
Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of the major influences on attitudes towards and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74(1), 1-18.
Tuan, Chin and Sheh (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, Vol 27(6), 634-659.
Teixeira Dos Santos, F. M., & Fleury Mortimer, E. (2003). How emotions shape the relationship between a chemistry teacher and her high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1095-1110
Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Coppola, B. (2003). Skill and will: the role of motivation and cognition in learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1081-1094.
Varenne, F. (2003). La simulation conçue comme expérience concrète. Communication présenté aux 10e journées de rencontres interdisciplinaires sur les sur les systèmes complexes naturels et artificiels.
Venturini, P. (2007). L’implication des élèves à apprendre la physique. Actes des 55e journées nationales de l’UdPPC (pp.1-10).
Viau, R. (2002). La motivation des élèves en difficulté d’apprentissage: une problématique particulière pour des modes d’intervention adaptés. Communication présenté dans le cadre du Cycle de conférences « Difficulté d'apprendre, Difficulté d'enseigner». Luxembourg, Grand duché du Luxembourg.
Wentzler, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (2009). Handbook of Motivation at School. New-York, NY: Routledge.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2684
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Ali Ouasri, Touria Bouatlaoui
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
