Konstantinos Lavidas, Vasilios Gialamas


Nowadays more and more self-report measures are used in social psychology, where many of them are susceptible to response biases. Socially Desirable Responding (SDR) might be interpreted in terms of response biases. The present study, with a sample of 173 Greek university students, used confirmatory factor analysis to establish the adequacy of Reynolds (1982) three forms from the original 33 item version of Crowne & Marlowe (1960) in measuring social desirability. Results showed that the three short forms of social desirability scale provide satisfactory measures of social desirability, while the form with the smaller number of items presented improved measures in comparison to all other forms.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



social desirability, response bias, self-reports, higher education, confirmatory factor analysis

Full Text:



Beretvas, N. S., Meyers, J. L., & Leite, W. L. (2002). A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 4, 570–589.

Bowman, N. A., & Hill, P. L. (2011). Measuring How College Affects Students: Social Desirability and Other Potential Biases in College Student Self-Reported Gains, (150), 73–85.

Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological methods & research, 33(2), 261-304.

Cronbach LJ (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16(3): 297–334. doi:10.1007/bf02310555.

Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of consulting psychology, 24(4), 349.

Fischer, D. G., & Fick, C. (1993). Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(2), 417-424. Doi: 10.1177/0013164493053002011

Hu, L, & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

Kelly, N., Harpel, T., Fontes, A., Walters, C., & Murphy, J. (2017). An examination of social desirability bias in measures of college students' financial behavior. College Student Journal, 51(1), 115-128.

Krumpal I., (2013) Determinants of Social Desirability Bias in Sensitive Surveys: A Literature Review. Qual Quant 47(4), 2025-2047.

Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949.

Loo, R., & Thorpe, K. (2000). Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the Full and Short Versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. The Journal of Social Psychology.140(5), 628-635, Doi: 10.1080/00224540009600503

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 51(6), 882-888.

Miller, A.L. (2012). Investigating social desirability bias in student self‐report surveys. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(1), 30–47.

Mîndrilă, D. (2010). Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Diagonally Weighted Least Squares (DWLS) Estimation Procedures: A Comparison of Estimation Bias with Ordinal and Multivariate Non-Normal Data. International Journal for Digital Society, 1(1), 60–66.

Nauta M. M. (2007) Assessing College Students' Satisfaction with Their Academic Majors. 15(4), 446-462.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.

R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL.

Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of clinical psychology, 38(1), 119-125.

Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–23.1097. Journal of statistical software, 48(2), 1-36.

Sârbescu, P., Costea, I., & Rusu, S. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale in a Romanian sample. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 707-711. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.213

Steenkamp, J. B. E., De Jong, M. G., & Baumgartner, H. (2010). Socially desirable response tendencies in survey research. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 199-214.

Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1973). Semantic style variance in personality questionnaires. The Journal of psychology, 85(1), 109-118.

Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological bulletin 133(5), 859–883.

Zook II, A., & Sipps, G. J. (1985). Cross‐validation of a short form of the Marlowe‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41(2), 236-238.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Konstantinos Lavidas, Vasilios Gialamas

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).