A PRACTICAL MENTORSHIP MODEL FOR RAISING LEARNING OUTCOMES AMONG ACADEMICALLY LOW ACHIEVING STUDENTS IN MACHAKOS UNIVERSITY, KENYA

James M. Muola, David Mulwa, Peter Kimiti, Wycliffe Amukowa

Abstract


Academic mentorship has been practiced in a number of universities including Machakos in Kenya though ineffectively due to the large student numbers and the presumably misconceived assumption that all students are in need and will voluntarily seek assistance. Most of the students admitted in public universities have the potential to excel academically if properly guided, supported and challenged. For academic mentorship to be successful and profitable to students, there is need to come with a workable model suitable for Kenyan universities. The main objectives of this study were to improve learning outcomes of academically low achieving students through mentorship, test an academic mentorship model for Machakos University, enhance mentorship competences of academic staff in Machakos University, and to develop mentorship resources for use by academic staff and students of Machakos University. The study used the time series experimental design in which 239 academically low achieving students were purposively selected on the basis of their performance. The selected students had failed between one and four units during the January-April 2018 semester. Each mentor was allocated ten students and advised to meet with them for at least five times during the semester. The mentees were subjected to a rigorous academic mentorship process for one semester and their end of semester performance was compared with the performance in the preceding semester. The study mainly used documentary analysis to gather the required data. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics. Majority of (72.38 %, N =173) of the respondents had failed one unit; 16.32% (39), two units; 8.37% (20), three units and 2.99% (7) four units respectively. The results showed that more than a half (52.24%) of the students who had failed some units during the January–April 2018 managed to pass all the units registered in the subsequent semester after exposure to mentorship. The percentage pass rate varied from programme to programme. Students registered for the BSc in Agribusiness and Trade programme recorded the highest percentage (70%) pass and those in Bachelor of Science in Mathematics recording the least improvement of 25%. It was concluded that properly organized and structured mentorship can drastically reduce the number of students who fail their examinations. It was recommended that universities through the schools and departments should institutionalize academic mentorship focusing mainly on low achieving students to minimize the number of students who fail each semester. This will improve progression and retention of students.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


mentorship, academic, low achievers, students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Backhus, D. (1989). Centralized intrusive advising and undergraduate retention. NACADA Journal, 9: 39-45.

Daloz, L. (1986). Effective teaching and mentoring: Realizing the transformational power of adult learning experiences. Jossey Bass: San Francisco.

Daloz, L. A. (2012). Mentor: Guiding the journey of adult learners. Wiley: New York.

Habley W. R. (2003). Faculty advising: Practice and promise. Boston, MA: Anker: Faculty advising examined: Enhancing the potential of college faculty as advisors.

Habley, W. R. (2004). The status of academic advising: Findings from the act sixth national survey (monograph no. 10) Manhattan, KS: National Academic Advising Association.

Hansford, B. C., Tennent, L. & Ehrich, L. C. (2003). Educational mentoring: Is it worth the effort? Education Research and Perspectives, 39(1), pp. 42–75. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00002259/

Haught, A., Hill, L. A., Walls, R. T. Nardi, A. H. (1998). Improved Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) and Academic Performance: The Impact of Feedback on Freshmen. Journal of the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 10, 2, 25-40 Retrieved 25th September, 2019 from http://fyesit.mtapress.com/content/577177708840g632/

Hester, E. (2008). Student evaluations of advising: Moving beyond the mean. College Teaching, 56(1): 35-38.

Johnson, W. B. (2008). Are advocacy, mutuality, and evaluation incompatible mentoring functions? Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16 (1): 31-44.

Keup, J. R. & Stolzenberg, E. B. (2004). The 2003 your first college year (YFCY) survey: Exploring the academic and personal experiences of first-year students (No. 40). Columbia: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

Keup, J. R. & Stolzenberg, E. B. (2004). The 2003 your first college year (YFCY) survey: Exploring the academic and personal experiences of first-year students (No. 40). Columbia: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

Keup, J., & Stolzenberg, E. (2004). The 2003 your first college year (YFCY) survey: Exploring the academic and personal experiences of first-year students. (Monograph No. 40). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina National Resource Center for The Freshman Year Experience and Students in Transition

Levinson, D. J. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf.

McArthur, R. (2005). Faculty-based advising: An important factor in community college retention. Community College Review, 32(4): 1-19.

McLaren, J. (2004). The changing face of undergraduate academic advising. Guidance & Counseling, Vol.19, No.4, pp.173-175.

Mcnally, P. and Martin, S. (1998). Support and challenge in learning to teach: the role of the mentor, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 26, (1), 39-50.

Walker, S. C. and D. J. Taub (2001). Variables correlated with satisfaction with a mentoring relationship in first-year college students and their mentors. Journal of The First Year Experience and Students in Transition, 13(1): 47-67.

Pascarella, E. T. and P. T. Terenzini (2005). How college affects students. A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Pargett, K. (2011). The effects of academic advising on college student development in higher Available from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsedaddiss/81/.

Poliner, R. and C. Lieber (2004). The advisory guide. Cambridge, MA: Educators for social responsibility.

Steingass, S. and S. Sykes, 2008. Centralizing advising to improve student outcomes. Peer Review, 10(1): 18-21.

Whitmore, J. (2002). Coaching for performance. Brealey Publishing: London.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2756

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 James M. Muola, David Mulwa, Peter Kimiti, Wycliffe Amukowa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).