Richard Kwabena Akrofi Baafi


The influence of teaching quality on student outcomes in Ghanaian public senior high schools has dominated education discourse in recent past. However, few studies have attempted to establish how teacher-student relationship influences their classroom engagement and learning outcomes. This study attempted to address this gap by utilizing a sample of 220 students and 160 teachers to establish the perception of teachers concerning their relationship with students and how this perception of teacher-student relationship influences student learning outcomes. The study established that teachers with a minimal conflicting relationship with students experienced positive learning outcomes. The study further found that teachers who are professionally close with their students and have made their students professionally dependent on them experienced an increase in their level of student behavioural and instructional engagement. This study recommends that teachers must inculcate a positive teacher-student relationship which will improve both school and classroom learning environment as well as student academic achievement.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



teacher-student relationship, learning outcomes, senior high schools

Full Text:



Amponsah, S., Kwesi, A. B., & Ernest, A. (2019). Lin’s creative pedagogy framework as a strategy for fostering creative learning in Ghanaian schools. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 11-18.

Baker, J. A., Grant, S., & Morlock, L. (2008). The teacher-student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems. School psychology quarterly, 23(1), 3.

Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Mouratidis, A., Katartzi, E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., & Vlachopoulos, S. (2018). Beware of your teaching style: A school-year long investigation of controlling teaching and student motivational experiences. Learning and Instruction, 53, 50-63.

Bell, M., Bayliss, D., Glauert, R., Harrison, A., & Ohan, J. (2019). Children of parents who have been hospitalised with psychiatric disorders are at risk of poor school readiness. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 28(5), 508-520.

Blegur, J. (2019). Students’ Academic Self-Concept: A Founding Strategy in Learning Process.

Coffey, A. (2013). Relationships: The key to successful transition from primary to secondary school? Improving Schools, 16(3), 261-271.

Dee, T. S. (2007). Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. Journal of human resources, 42(3), 528-554.

Emmer, E. T., & Hickman, J. (1991). Teacher efficacy in classroom management and discipline. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(3), 755-765.

Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring Student Engagement in Upper Elementary through High School: A Description of 21 Instruments. Issues & Answers. REL 2011-No. 098. Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.

Harper, R. P., Weston, T. J., & Seymour, E. (2019). Students’ Perceptions of Good STEM Teaching Talking about Leaving Revisited (pp. 245-276): Springer.

Khan, I. U., Hameed, Z., Yu, Y., Islam, T., Sheikh, Z., & Khan, S. U. (2018). Predicting the acceptance of MOOCs in a developing country: Application of task-technology fit model, social motivation, and self-determination theory. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 964-978.

Lee, B. L., Worthington, A., & Wilson, C. (2019). Learning environment and primary school efficiency: a DEA bootstrap truncated regression analysis. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(4), 678-697.

Lorsbach, A., & Jinks, J. (1999). Self-efficacy theory and learning environment research. Learning environments research, 2(2), 157-167.

Marshall, S. R. (2011). Teacher-student Relationships and Student Engagement: An Investigation of Teachers' Cognitions, Emotions and Behaviours.

Mensah, F. S. (2017). Ghanaian Senior High School Students’ Error in Learning of Trigonometry. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(0), 8.

Moeyaert, M., Klingbeil, D. A., Rodabaugh, E., & Turan, M. (2019). Three-level meta-analysis of single-case data regarding the effects of peer tutoring on academic and social-behavioral outcomes for at-risk students and students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 0741932519855079.

Osher, D., Kelly, D. L., Tolani-Brown, N., Shors, L., & Chen, C.-S. (2009). UNICEF child friendly schools programming: Global evaluation final report. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Palmer, D. (2019). Student Transportation Program of the Seattle Public Schools January 2019.

Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1-14.

Peterson, P. L., & Fennema, E. (1985). Effective teaching, student engagement in classroom activities, and sex-related differences in learning mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 22(3), 309-335.

Pianta, R. C. (2001). Student-teacher relationship scale: Professional manual: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365-386): Springer.

Ponomareva, E., & Khuziakhmetov, A. (2017). Psychological diagnostics of the first-year students' adaptation to a higher school environment.

Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influences on student motivation. Big theories revisited, 4, 31-60.

Schleicher, A., & Zoido, P. (2016). Global equality of educational opportunity: Creating the conditions for all students to succeed. Journal of Social Issues, 72(4), 696-719.

Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (2013). The role of educative curriculum materials in reforming science education. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48109.

Schweisfurth, M. (2015). Learner-centred pedagogy: Towards a post-2015 agenda for teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 259-266.

Settanni, M., Longobardi, C., Sclavo, E., Fraire, M., & Prino, L. E. (2015). Development and psychometric analysis of the student–teacher relationship scale–short form. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 898.

Smith, A. B., Rush, R., Fallowfield, L. J., Velikova, G., & Sharpe, M. (2008). Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 33.

Spilt, J. L., & Hughes, J. N. (2015). African American children at risk of increasingly conflicted teacher–student relationships in elementary school. School psychology review, 44(3), 306-314.

Verger, A., Altinyelken, H. K., & Novelli, M. (2018). Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Wang, M.-T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633-662.

Wyer Jr, R. S., & Carlston, D. E. (2018). Social cognition, inference, and attribution: Psychology Press.

Zullig, K. J., Huebner, E. S., & Patton, J. M. (2011). Relationships among school climate domains and school satisfaction. Psychology in the Schools, 48(2), 133-145.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2869


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Richard Kwabena Akrofi Baafi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).