Mahnaz Akhavan Tafti, Mansoor Ali Hameedy, Maryam Mohsenpour, Farkhonde Taheri Ghaletak


From a constructivist point of view, the identification of any shortcomings in the educational process would be the first step towards its reconstruction and improvement. Although, to do so require an evaluation of the whole system and its processes and products.  However, an evaluative analysis of its products can help identify some of the deficiencies and ways of overcoming them. To this end, given the realities of the Iranian scene in regard to graduate studies, a set of master's theses in educational psychology was evaluated in terms of having the very basic characteristics of a research report in both structure and content. Given that previous research has shown major shortcomings in these respects, it was suspected that the mushrooming of institutions granting graduate degrees, and the increase in admissions, may have exacerbated the problem. The current findings show that the shortcomings have increased both in scope and depth, implying that the quality of both teaching and learning how to research has declined.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



critical review, master's theses, educational psychology, research literacy

Full Text:



Akhavan Tafti, M., Taheri Ghaletak, F., Mohsenpour, M. (2019). Evaluating the quality of master degree thesis of Educational Psychology graduates. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 25(2): 87-113.

Anbari Z., Jadidi R. A. (2013). Comparing of Barriers to Research Activities among Students of Arak University of Medical Sciences, and Appropriate Strategies for Student Research Management. Iranian Journal of Medical Education; 13(5):399-412.

Azizi, N. (2008). Examination of the Challenges and Insufficiencies of Academic Education in the Humanities: A Reflection on the Students’ Views. Iranian Journal of Higher Education, 1(2): 7-32. [Persian]

Farhadpoor M. R. (2016). Investigation the Barriers of the Dissertation-based Scientific Products of Khuzestan Science and Research Branch of Islamic Azad University Students. Higher Education Letter; 8 (32): 53-76. [Persian]

Farmanbar, R., Asgari F (2005). Study of Constraining Factors of Research from the Viewpoint of Faculty Members in Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences; 14 (54): 84-91. [Persian]

Ghanbari, L. (2007). Comparison of proposal and theses quality of MA Theses from quality oriented management. MA Thesis, Alzahra University. [Persian]

Hameedy, M. A. (2007). Scientistic attitude to educational democracy. Tehran, Center for Educational Research Pub. [Persian]

Hameedy, M. A. (2013). Motivation, engagement, and learning: an attitude based theory within the dialectical constructivist framework. Tehran, Nashre Ghatreh. [Persian]

Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran, (2018). https://www.msrt.ir/en/page/8/universities

Nilee, M. N., Nasr, A. R., Akbari, N. (2007). Review of guidance quality of MA Theses. Bimontly Research Journal, Shahed University; 4(24): 111-122. [Persian]

Taheri, F. (2017). Evaluation of research literacy of educational psychology MA students through assessment of quality of their theses. Educational Psychology MA Thesis, Alzahra University. [Persian]

Wilson A., Howitt S., Wilson K., Roberts P. (2012). Academics' perceptions of the purpose of undergraduate research experiences in a research-intensive degree. Studies in Higher Education; 37 (5): 26-513.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2950


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Mahnaz Akhavan Tafti, Mansoor Ali Hameedy, Maryam Mohsenpour, Farkhonde Taheri Ghaletak

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).