THE VIEWS OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS CONCERNING THE USE OF LOCAL DIALECT

Kürşad Çağrı Bozkırlı, Onur Er

Abstract


This study aims to examine the opinions of teacher candidates on the use of local dialect. 50 teacher candidates, who attended Kafkas, Kilis 7 Aralık and Atatürk Universities in 2019-2020 academic year from different branches and class levels, were chosen according to convenience sampling, and participated in the study which was designed as qualitative research and a case study. The data were collected through the five-question semi-structured interview form, developed by the researchers, and were analyzed with the content analysis method. As a result of the study, it was determined that teacher candidates did not lean towards the use of local dialect mostly, but they felt comfortable while using the local dialect and did not find it necessary to make efforts to reduce the use of local dialect. Besides, it was determined that teacher candidates thought that the city they were born or lived in had an impact on the uses of local dialect, and they used the local dialect most often with their families and their friends.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


teacher candidate, local dialect, qualitative research, interview, content analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akkaya, A. (2012). The opinions of teacher candidates about speech problems. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(20), 405-420. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mkusbed/issue/19549/208420.

Alford, R. L. & Judith, B. S. (1990). Attitudes of native and nonnative speakers toward selected regional accents of U.S. English. ESOL Quarterly, 24(3), 479-495. Doi: 10.2307/3587231.

Alyılmaz, S. & Alyılmaz, C. (2018). The importance of dialectology studies in regards to Turkish teaching. Journal of Language and Literature, 45, 7-38. Doi: 10.24155/tdk.2018.55.

Büyükikiz, K. K. & Hasırcı, S. (2013). The importance of speaking skill in mother tongue education. Research in Reading & Writing Instruction, 1(1), 57-63. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/oyea/issue/20479/218126.

Cheshire, J. & Trudgill, P. (1989). Dialect and education in the United Kingdom. ed. J. Cheshire, V. Edwards, H. Münstermann ve B. Weltens. Dialect and education. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters, 94-109.

Demir, N. (2002). Ağız terimi üzerine. Türkbilig, 4, 105-116.

Demir, S. & Gül Özdil, B. (2019). Speaking skills of secondary school students by teachers’ opinions. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 865-881. Doi: 10.17240/aibuefd.2019.19.49440-431301.

Dilekmen, M. & Başçı, Z. (2008). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin iletişim becerileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 12(2), 223-231. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/2822/38075.

Dunstan, S. B. & Jaeger, A. (2015). Dialect and influences on the academic experiences of college students. The Journal of Higher Education, 86, 777-803. Doi: 10.1080/00221546.2015.11777383.

Ekberg, L. & Östman, Jan-Ola (2020). Identity construction and dialect acquisition among immigrants in rural areas - the case of Swedish-language Finland. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development. Doi: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1722681.

Er, O. & Demir, Ö. (2013). An investigation of speaking skills of Turkish teachers from the viewpoint of the preservice Turkish teaching teachers. Turkish Studies, 8(1), 1417-1436. Doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.3696.

Erdem, İ. (2013). Speech disorders encountered during speech therapy and therapy techniques. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(11), 415-452. Doi: 10.14520/adyusbd.453.

Glesne, C. (2012). Nitel araştırmaya giriş (A. Ersoy & P. Yalçınoğlu, Trans.). Ankara: Anı (Original work published 2011).

Gündüz, O. & Şimşek, T. (2014). Anlatma teknikleri 2 konuşma eğitimi. Ankara: Grafiker.

Gürlek, M. & Aksu, E. (2013). Konuşma hataları. In A. Kılınç & A. Şahin (Ed). Konuşma eğitimi (pp. 181-197). Ankara: Pegem.

Karakoç Öztük, B. & Altuntaş, İ.(2012). Teachers’ views about speaking education in elementary school: A qualitative study. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(2), 342-356.

McMillan, J. & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education evidence-based inquiry (7th Edition). Boston: Pearson.

Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.

Pehlivan, A. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının Anadolu ağızlarına yönelik tutum ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Bilig, 63, 135-158.

Rabanus, S. (2019). Language mapping worldwide: Methods and traditions. In S. D. Brunn & R. Kehrein (Eds.). Handbook of the changing world language map (pp. 103-129). Cham: Pearson.

Röthlisberger, M. & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2019). Dialect typology: Recent advances. In S. D. Brunn & R. Kehrein (Eds.). Handbook of the changing world language map (pp. 131-156). Cham: Pearson Yay.

Sarikaya, B. (2019). Problems and solution proposals for Turkish education teachers working in rural areas: Muş sample. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 43, 151-171. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yyusbed/issue/44211/545674.

Sönmez, V. & Alacapınar, G. F. (2011). Örneklendirilmiş bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Anı.

Temizyürek, F., Erdem, İ. & Temizkan, M. (2017). Konuşma eğitimi sözlü anlatım. Ankara: Pegem.

Topçuoğlu Ünal, F. & Degeç, H. (2012). The problems in speaking education according to teacher’ judgements. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 7(5), 735-750. Doi: 10.9761/JASSS178

Topçuoğlu Ünal, F. & Özden, M. (2015). Diksiyon ve konuşma eğitimi. Ankara: Pegem.

Toptaş, B. & Sönmez, A. (2015). Effects on the right and effective speaking skills of individual voice training course in school of fine arts department of music. İnönü University Journal of Culture and Art, 1(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijca/issue/7995/105017

Uçgun, D. (2007). The factors affecting the speaking education. Erciyes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 22, 59-67.

Yelok, V. S. & Dolunay, S. K. (2007). Telaffuz meselesi ve ülkemizde telaffuz eğitimi. Türk Yurdu 27(239), 63-66.

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.

Yıldırım, B. (2015). The use of local components in humour and development of social criticism discourse: In the case of Fırfırik magazine published in Erzurum. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 121-160. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/2839/38770.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i10.3276

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Kürşad Çağrı Bozkırlı, Onur Er

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).