THE BUILDING OF A NEW LANGUAGE LEARNING MODEL BASED ON THE CHOMSKYAN CONCEPT
Abstract
In the light of the wide spread variety of teaching and learning methods and approaches, the building of a new Language Learning Model rises as a serious contribution that aims to surmount the problem of learning acquisition among language learners. Hence, this study comes into existence to investigate some time in such a way as to come up with some solutions on the basis of the surveyed literature in this field, especially on the basis of the Chomskyan concept of learning. By a Language Learning Model, we mean a model of learning which is based on four meaningful and required dimensions. The first one is the cross-linguistic applicability of the model to all the existing natural languages. The second one is the covering of all the cognitive and non-cognitive factors. The third one is the contextualisation of the learning factors. The fourth one is related to the process of learning and how it should take into account the three learning components, input and its richness, the students’ building competency, and communicative acts that lead to the students’ performance, in accordance with four evaluative value, quantity, quality, manner, and relation. The new conceptualized Language Learning Model is a model that helps in the activation of the learners’ expressivity in terms of creativity, adaptation, and engagement in the learning process through meaningful and comprehensible activities. A learning device that is comprehensive and instructional and that allows the learners to engage in a continuous dialogic context that enables them to learn a language by resolving the conflict between their expressivity and the limitations super-imposed by their brain.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bloom, L, and Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Borghans, L., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., and Ter Weel, B. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43(4), 972-1059.
Burrus, J., MacCann, C., Kyllonen, P., & Roberts, R. D. (2011). Non-cognitive constructs in K–16: Assessments, interventions, educational and policy implications. In P. J. Bowman & E. P. St John (Eds.), Diversity, merit, and higher education: Toward a comprehensive agenda for the twenty-first century (pp. 233–274). Ann Arbor, MI: AMS Press.
Chomsky, N. (2015). The Minimalist Program. Vol. 20th anniversary edition, The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and mind. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press. eBook., Base de données: eBook Academic Collection Trial.
Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures in Government and Binding Theory. (Studies in general grammar 9). Dordrecht Foris Publication.
Chomsky, N. (1979). On language: Chomsky’s classic works, language and responsibility and reflections on language. The New Press, New York.
Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. Pantheon Books, a division of Random House, Inc., New York.
Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of B. F. Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.
Dąbrowska, E. (2015). What exactly is Universal Grammar, and has anyone seen it? Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00852. Retrieved from www.scihub.tw/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00852
Denton, W. H. (1966). Problem-solving as a theory of learning and teaching. The High School Journal, Vol. 49, No. 8 (May, 1966), pp. 382-390. University of North Carolina Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40366239
Dewey, J. (1938) Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
Duchastel, P., and Molz, M. (2004). Learning and design: The quest for a theory of learning. Educational Technology, Vol. 44, No. 1 (January-February 2004), pp. 45-48.
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(05), 429. doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999094x. Retrieved from www.sci-hub.tw/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
Glasersfeld, E.V. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Series: 6. Routledge and Falmer, Taylor & Francis Group: New York.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Hughes, A. (2004). New Times? New Learners? New Voices? Towards a Contemporary Social Theory of Learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 25, No. 3 (Jul., 2004), pp. 395-408. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4128697
Humboldt, W. V. (1988). On language: The diversity of human-language structure and its influence on the mental development of mankind. Cambridge University Press: New York.
Inhelder, B. (1978). Language and thought: Some remarks on Chomsky and Piaget. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7(4), 263–268. Plenum Publishing Corporation. Doi:10.1007/bf01068109. Retrieved from www.sci-hub.tw/10.1007/BF01068109
Johnson, B. A. (1996). Language disorders in children: An introductory clinical perspective. New York, NY: Delmar Publishers.
Jonassen, D. (2003, July-August). The vain quest for a unified theory of learning. Educational Technology , 43(4), 5-8.
Lahey, M. (Ed.). (1988). Language disorders and language development. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Lipnevich, A. A., Krumm, & Roberts, R. D. (2014). Noncognitive skills in education: Emerging research and applications in a variety of international contexts. Learning and Individual Differences 22 (2014) 173–177.
Lewis, M. W., & Grimes, A. J. (1999). Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review, 24, 672-690.
Pierre, G., Sanchez Puerta, M. L., Valerio, A., and Rajadel, T. (2014). STEP skills measurement surveys: innovative tools for assessing skills.
Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes; [translated by Beatrix Walsh] Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Chicago and The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Piaget, J. (1967). Biologie et connaissance. Collection Idées (n° 288), Gallimard. Paris.
Piatelli-Palmarini. M. (Ed.) (1979). Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. New York: Routledge
Reigeluth C. (1999). (Ed.). Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Volume II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
Scholtz, D. (2020). Assessing workplace-based learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 2020, 21(1), 25-35. ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339612946_Assessing_workplace-based_learning/link/5e5c0a9d4585152ce8ff1352/download
Seels, B. B. (Ed.). (1995). Instructional design fundamentals: A reconsideration. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
Skinner, B. F. (1976). About Behaviorism. New York: Vintage Books.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan. [Harvard University. Cambridge. MA.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177. doi:10.1037/h0074428. Retrieved from https://booksc.xyz/book/53521936/cc2ca8
Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i8.3288
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Mustapha Boughoulid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
