Ayşe Yavuz, Selin (Inag) Çenbercii


The purpose of this study is to research the effects of visual contextual support for the subject of circle in geometry education. The study was conducted by using one of the qualitative research methods, special case study. The sampling of the research was formed by 72 teacher candidates who are studying in Necmettin Erbakan University Ahmet Keleşoğlu Faculty of Education Primary Education Department Primary Education Mathematics Teaching Department. As data collection tool, an evaluation consisting of verbally asked problems regarding the subject of circle was used. Questions were selected according to the relevant subject among the Olympics questions. When selecting the questions, care was taken to contain most basic information about the relevant subject but include the attributes that are having difficulties in transferring of concepts into shapes. As a result of the study, it was observed that teacher candidates were having difficulties in transferring the question into a shape while solving the questions that are directed to them without a visual contextual support and reaching the correct answer. In conclusion, it is seen that questions provided with visual contextual support could easily be solved by students but prevents their spatial thinking skills.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter


geometry education, circle, mathematics teacher candidates, visual contextual support


Baştürk, S. (2011). The teaching-learning process in the education faculty of mathematics teachers reviews. International Journal of Human Sciences

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün,E.Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara Pegem Academy Publisher.

Clements, D. H. (1998). Geometric and spatial thinking in young children, Opinion Paper. National Science Foundation. Arlington, VA.

Davis, A. ve Bamford, G. (1995). The effect of imagery on young children's ability to solve simple arithmetic. Education Section Review, 19, 61-68.

Erdoğan, T., Akkaya, R., & Akkaya, S.Ç. (2009). The effect of the Van Hiele model based instruction on the creative thinking levels of 6th grade primary school students. Educational Science: Theory & Practise, 9(1), 181-194.

Fidan, Y. & Türnüklü, E. (2010). Elementary 5th grade students to examine the level of geometric thinking in terms of some variables. Pamukkale University Faculty of Education Journal, 27, 185-197.

JONES, K., MOONEY, C. and HARRİES, T. (2002), Trainee Primary Teachers’ Knowledge of Geometry for Teaching, Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 22(2), 95-100.

Kılıç, Ç. (2003). Elementary 5th Grade Math Academic Achievement of Students of Made Geometry Education According to Van Hiele Level Course, Attitude, and also remember Retention Levels Impact on, M.Sc., Anadolu University Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir.

Konyalıoglu, A. C. (2003). To assess the effectiveness of visualization approaches to the understanding of the concept of vector spaces on the university level. Ph.D. Ataturk University at the Institute of Science and Technology.

Mesquita, A.L. (1998). On Conceptual Obstacles Linked with External Representations in Geometry. Journal Of Mathematical Behavior, 17 (2), 183-195.

Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB], (2010). Ortaöğretim geometri dersi 9-10. sınıflar öğretim programı. Ankara: MEB Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığ

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author

Nemirovsky, R. & Noble, T. (1997). On mathematical visualization and the place where we live. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 33(2), 99–131.

Sabuncuoğlu, A. (2000). Analytic Geometry. Nobel Publication. Ankara.

Sherard, W. H. (1981). Math anxiety in the classroom. The Clearing House 55, 106-110.

Shield, M. ve Swinson, K. V. (1997). Encouraging learning in mathematics through miting.

The Australian Mathematics Teacher, 53 (1), 4-9.

Tapan, M. & Arslan, Ç. (2009). Preservice teachers’ use of spatio-visual elements and their 71 level of justification dealing with a geometrical construction problem. US-China Education Review, 6(3), 54-60

Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (1999). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Ayşe Yavuz, Selin (Inag) Çenbercii

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).