MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLES AND THEIR PERCEPTION OF PROFESSION

Cemil Yigit, Elif Atabek-Yigit

Abstract


In this study, it was aimed to explore learning styles of third year mechanical engineering students and also their perception of profession. Ninety-nine third year students studying mechanical engineering at a university located southwest of Turkey were the participants of this study. Data were collected through Kolb Learning Styles Inventory (KLSI) and a Word Association Test with the keyword “engineer” (WAT). Data obtained from KLSI were used in order to identify the participants’ learning styles and data gathered by WAT were used to obtain information about their perception of their future profession. Four groups, namely assimilators, accommodators, divergers, and convergers were formed according to analysis of KLSI and WAT’s of each group have examined separately. Conceptualizing of their future profession for each learning group was visualized by concept maps. It was found that majority of participants have assimilating and converging learning styles and learning styles have an effect on their perception of profession. 

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


learning styles, Kolb Learning Style Inventory, profession perception, mechanical engineering students

References


Askar, P. & Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb Learning Style Inventory (in Turkish). Education and Science, 87, 37-47.

Atabek-Yigit, E. (2016). Investigating Cognitive Structures in Some Basic Chemistry Concepts via Word Association Test, Elementary Education Online, 15, 4, 1385-1398.

Atabek-Yigit, E., Yilmazlar, M., & Cetin, E. (2016). Investigation of Classroom Teacher Candidates’ Cognitive Structures on Some Basic Science Concepts, European Journal of Education Studies, 2,1, 33-57.

Bahar, M. & Özatlı, N.S. (2003). Investigation of High School Students’ Cognitive Structures on Basic Components of Livings via Word Association Test (in Turkish). BAU Journal of Science Education, 5 (2), 75-85.

Bahar, M., Johnstone, A.H., & Sutcliffe, R.G.(1999). Investigation of students’ cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33,3,134-141.

Ben-zvi-Assarf, O., Orion, N. (2005). A study of junior high students’ perceptions of water cycle, Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 4, 366-373.

Canagagh, S.J., Hogan, K., & Ramgopal, T. (1995). The assessment of student nurse learning styles using the Kolb Learning Styles Inventory, Nurse Education Today, 15, 177-183.

Carrizosa, K., & Sheppard, S. (2000). The importance of learning styles in group design work Session T2B. In 30 th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 12-17. Kansas City, MO: IEEE.

D’Amore, A., James, S. & Mitchell, E.K.L. (2012). Learning styles of first-year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students: A cross-sectional survey utilizing the Kolb Learning Style Inventory, Nurse Education Today, 32, 506-515.

Dabbagh, N. & Menasce, D.A. (2006). Student Perceptions of Engineering Entrepreneurship: An Explanatory Study, Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 2, 153-164.

Diaz, D.P. & Cartnal, R.B. (1999). Students’ learning styles in two classes: online distance learning and equivalent on-campus, College Teaching, 47, 4, 130-135.

Direito, I., Pereira, A. & Duarte, M.D.O. (2012). Engineering undergraduates’ perceptions of soft skills: Relations with self-efficacy and learning styles, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 843-851.

Evin-Gencel, I. (2007). Adaptation of Learning Styles Inventory III that Based on Kolb’s Experiental Learning Theory to Turkish.(in Turkish). Dokuz Eylul Uni Social Sciences Institute Journal, 9,2, 120-139.

Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.

Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., Stice, J.E. & Rugarcia, A. (2000). The future of engineering education II. Teaching methods that work, Chem.Engr.Education, 34,1, 26-39.

Ismail, N. (2013). Teaching as career choice as perceived by technical and vocational education student teachers, Masters Thesis, University Putra, Malaysia.

Jonassen, D. H. ve B. L. Grabowski (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.

Knight, M. & Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw an Engineer Test: Development of a Tool to Investigate Students’ Ideas about Engineers and Engineering. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.

Kolb, D. (1981). Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences. Jossey-Bass Inc. Publ., San Francisco, CA, USA.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experiences as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J, USA.

Kostova, Z. & Radoynovska, B. (2008). Word association test for studying conceptual structures of teachers and students. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 2(2), 209-231.

Larkin-Hein, T. & Budny, D.D. (2001). Research on learning style: applications in the physics and engineering classrooms, IEEE Transactions on Education, 44,3, 276-281.

Mansor, M.S.A. & Ismail, A. (2012). Learning styles and perception of engineering students towards online learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 669-674.

Marshall, H., McClaymont, L. & Joyce, L. (2007). Public attitudes to and perceptions of engineering and engineers 2007. Report, The Royal Academy of Engineering & The Engineering and Technology Board, UK.

McLeod, S. A. (2013). Kolb - Learning Styles. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. (3rd Ed.). USA: Sage Publications.

Mishkin, H., Wangrowicz, N., Dori, D., & Dori, Y.J. (2016). Career Choice of Undergraduate Engineering Students, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 222-228.

Misran, N., & Sahuri, S.N.S. (2013). Undergraduate Students’ Perception Towads Engineering Program at UKM, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 110-115.

Scales, A.Y. (2000). The effect of learning style, major, and gender on learning computer-aided drawing in an introductory engineering/technical graphics course, Education Dissertation, NC State University, Ralleigh, NC, USA.

Schafer, A.I. (2006). A New Approach to Increasing Diversity in Engineering at the Example of Women in Engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31,6, 661-671.

Stice, J.E. (1987). Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning, Engineering Education, 77, 5, 291-296.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.383

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Cemil Yigit, Elif Atabek-Yigit

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).