INVESTIGATING THE IMPACT OF PEER FFEDBACK AND TEACHER FEEDBACK USING GOOGLE DOCS ON EFL STUDENTS’ WRITING PERFORMANCE

Nguyen Thi Nien Hoa, Trinh Quoc Lap

Abstract


Online written corrective feedback via Google Docs, in recent years, has been used and brought about positive outcomes in different teaching contexts. In this light, this study was conducted to examine the different effects between teacher feedback using Google Docs and the combined peer feedback and teacher feedback using Google Docs on EFL high school students’ performance in writing paragraphs. The study also attempted to gain insights into students’ attitudes towards the effect of peer feedback and teacher feedback using Google Docs on their paragraph writing. In this study, a mixed research method was employed; both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. Twenty two grade 11 students in a high school in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam were selected as participants. They were assigned to two groups of treatment: the experimental group, receiving both peer feedback and teacher feedback using Google Docs and the control group who only received teacher feedback using Google Docs. Participants completed two writing tasks; each of them included first draft, second draft and final draft. Prior to the study, students from the experimental group received a face-to-face training on giving peer feedback. Data were collected from six drafts of two writing tasks, three drafts for one task, and interviews at the end of the study. Results indicated that participants who received teacher feedback in the control group performed their paragraph writing better than those receiving both peer feedback and teacher feedback using Google Docs in the experimental group after the study. Also, participants in both groups improved their writing performance in their revised drafts. From the interviews, results showed participants’ positive attitudes towards the impact of peer feedback and teacher feedback using Google Docs on their paragraph writing. 

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


peer feedback, teacher feedback, Google Docs, paragraph writing, high school students, the Mekong Delta

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, C. (2012). Corrective Feedback: Perspectives on Corrective Comments in EFL and ESL Writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Educational Development, 3(4), 32-36.

Alharbi, M. A. (2019). Exploring the potential of Google Doc in facilitating innovative teaching and learning practices in an EFL writing course, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1572157

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010) How to Give Effective Feeback to Your Students. Instructional Supervision & Evaluation: The Teaching Process, 10-18.

Chaudron, C. (1984). The effects of feedback on students' composition revisions. RELC journal, 15(2), 1-14.

Ciftci, H. & Kocoglu, Z. (2012). Effects of peer e-feedback on Turkish EFL students' writing performance. Journal of Education Computing Research, 46(1), 61-84.

Dathumma, C., & Singhasiri, W. (2015). Students’ Perceptions towards Teacher Feedback on Google Docs. rEFLections, 19, 58-72.

Diab, A. M. (2019). Using Some Online-Collaborative Learning Tools (Google Docs & Padlet) to Develop Student Teachers' EFL Creative Writing Skills and Writing Self-Efficacy. مجلة کلیة التربیة. بنها, 30(119 یولیو ج 3), 1-51.‎

Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787–815.

Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2014). Learner uptake of teacher electronic feedback in ESL composition. System, 46, 80-95.

Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., ... & Mong, C. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 412-433.

Fauziah, F., & Sudarmaji, I. (2020). The effect of peer-editing technique by using Google Docs to enhance students’ academic writing Skills at 1st semester of English Department Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of Islamic University of Syekh Yusuf. Foremost Journal, 1(1), 10-19.

Franco, C. (2010). Teaching using Google. The Internet TESL Journal, 26(2). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Franco-Google/

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and teaching in higher education, (1), 3-31.

Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British educational research journal, 36(1), 143-162.

Higgins, R. (2000). Be more critical! Rethinking assessment feedback. DYKE V., PC3013.

Hoang, V. V., Hoang, H. T. T., Vu, L. T., Dao, L. N., Do, M. T. & Nguyen, T. Q. (2007). English 11 (Student’s textbook), Hanoi Publishing House, Education.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (Eds.) (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2013). Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing. Journal of second language writing, 22(3), 240-253.

Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44(4), 294–304. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/44.4.294

Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative Writing among Second Language Learners in Academic Web-Based Projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16 (1), 91-109. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44276

Klimova, B. F. (2011). Evaluating writing in English as a second language. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 390–394. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.074

Lantolf, J. P. (2004). Sociocultural theory and second and foreign language learning: An overview of sociocultural theory. New insights into foreign language learning and teaching, 9, 13-34.

Lavin, R. S. (2019). Towards Improved Corrective Feedback in Japanese EFL Writing Instruction. Education Applications & Developments IV Advances in Education and Educational Trends Series Edited by: Mafalda Carmo, 124.

Leibold, N., & Schwarz, L. M. (2015). The art of giving online feedback. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 34-46.

Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88–103.

Luu, T. T. (2010). Enhancing EFL learner’s writing skills via journal writing. English Language Teaching, 3 (3), 81-88.

Min, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293–308. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003

Ministry of Education and Training (2011). Circular No.: 58/2011/TT-BGDDT, “Promulgating regulation on assessment and classification of secondary schools and high school students”. Retrieved from https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/giao-duc/Thong-tu-58-2011-TT-BGDDT-Quy-che-danh-gia-xep-loai-hoc-sinh-trung-hoc-co-so-133268.aspx

Neumann, K. L., & Kopcha, T. J. (2019). Using Google Docs for peer-then-teacher review on middle school students’ writing. Computers and Composition, 54, 102524.

Nguyen, M. T. T. (2007). Textbook evaluation : the case of English textbooks currently in use at Vietnam. Seameo Regional Language Centre, (April), 1–77. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1219.2165

Nguyen, T. H. H. (2009). Teaching EFL writing in Vietnam: Problems and solutions-a discussion from the outlook of applied linguistics. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 25(1).

Nurmukhamedov, U. & Kerimova, I. (2017). Google. Docs: Writing practices and potential use in ESL/EFL environments. In Teaching English reflectively with technology.

Oxnevad, S. (2013). 6 powerful Google Docs features to support the collaborative writing process. Retrieved from http://www.teslej.org/wordpress/issues/vol ume14/ej55/ej55m1/

Phuong, Y. H. & Nguyen, P. T. Y. (2019). Impact of online Peer feedback on students’ writing performance and attitude. In Phuong, Y. H.; Nguyen, S. T. V. (Ed.), Using Alternative assessment to improve EFL learners’ learning achievement from theory to practice (pp. 81–98). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Rahmatunisa, W. (2014). Problems Faced by Indonesian EFL Learners. English Review: Journal of English Education, 3(1), 41-49.

Reid, J. M. (1993). Teaching ESL Writing. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT journal, 59(1), 23-30.

Semeraro, J., and N. S. Moore (2016). “The Use of Google Docs Technology to Support Peer Revision.” In Writing Instruction to Support Literacy Success, 203–220. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Srichanyachon, N. (2012). Teacher Written Feedback for L2 Learners’ Writing Development. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies (Former Name Ilpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, And Arts), 7–17.

Suwantarathip, O., & Wichadee, S. (2014). The Effects of Collaborative Writing Activity Using Google Docs on Students’ Writing Abilities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 13(2), 148–156.

Tai, H. C., Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2015). Exploring the Effects of Peer Review and Teachers’ Corrective Feedback on EFL Students’ Online Writing Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 284–309. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115597490

Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.

Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631– 645. University of Dundee, Scotland.

Tran, L. T. (2007). Learners' motivation and identity in the Vietnamese EFL writing classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(1), 151- 163.

Tran, N. T. Q. & Le, M. X. (2018). High School Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Facebook-Based E-Portfolios in EFL Writing: A Case in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam High School Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Facebook-Based E-Portfolios in EFL Writing. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(8), 28. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1256166

Tsui M. & Ng M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? J. Second Lang. Writ. 9(2):147-170.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 85-89.

Wu, W. S. (2006). The effect of blog peer review and teacher feedback on the revisions of EFL writers. Journal of Education and Foreign Languages and Literature, 3(2), 125-138.

Yang M., Badger R. & Yu Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. J. Second Lang. Writ. 15(3):179-200.

Yang, C. C. R. (2010). Using Google Docs to facilitate collaborative writing in an English language. TESL-EJ, 14(3), 1-8.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i10.3926

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Nguyen Thi Nien Hoa, Trinh Quoc Lap

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2021. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).