Jane Irene Dawo, James Sika


World-wide, 21st century higher education (HE) involves knowledge acquisition focused on addressing societal challenges. Fundamentally valuable are high order skills, such as critical thinking, creative problem solving, teamwork, evaluation, analysis, digital literacy, adaptability, and communication which can be used to navigate across a wide range of disciplines attributive to success in modern society. This is achievable through quality teaching for quality learning and hence the need for modernized pedagogical experience. In this regard, modern pedagogy in HE demands beyond routinized merely teachers’ transmission of information versus students’ retention efforts. It delves into the teaching of students on how to handle, address and interpret concepts, evidence and ideas, how to think and act as experts and how to produce original insights and valuable knowledge for the benefit of society, and ultimately, how to remain ahead of foreseeable societal challenges. Due to this, universities should change pedagogical approaches from fact-based traditional lecturing to interactive teaching with the aim of fostering deep understanding and expert-mindedness for problem-solving. This would result in graduates who fit the emerging economic, social and political situations that nations experience. They should be able to; approach societal challenges given their grounded curiosity, critical thinking and creativity, apply innovative skills in addressing real world problems, display a strong sense of personal and professional identity, and portray a high sense of self-efficacy. This paper is an attempt to explain how HE can give forth products who are world leaders in their specific disciplines in respect of teaching, research and community service.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter


higher education, evolving world, teaching for learning

Full Text:



Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E. and Wieman, C. (2011). Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class, Science, 332(6031), pp. 862–864. doi: 10.1126/science.1201783.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. and Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Proc. National Academy of Science, USA; 111(23): 8410-5 doi: 10.1073/pnas 13190111.

Ghadiri, K., Qayoumi, M., Junn, E., Hsu, P. and Sujitparapitaya, S. (2013). The Transformative Potential of Blended Learning Using MIT edX’s 6.002x Online MOOC Content Combined with

Student Team-Based Learning in Class. Available at: https://www.edx.org/sites/default/files/upload/ed-tech-paper.pdf (Accessed: 10 April 2017).

Guskey, T. R. (1985). Staff Development and Teacher Change. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=edp_facpub

Guskey, T. R. (2010). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. vol 8(3).

Herodotou, C., Aristeidou, M., & Scanlon, E. (2018). Designing Citizen Science Tools for Learning: Lessons learnt from the Iterative Development of nQuire. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning.vol.13(4).

Hobson, A. J. (2009). On being bottom of the pecking order: beginner teacher’s perceptions and experiences of support. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teacher’s Professional Development. Vol13(4).

Holmes, N. G., Wieman, C. E. and Bonn, D. A. (2015). Teaching critical thinking, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. National Academy of Sciences, 112(36), pp. 11199–204. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505329112.

Hudson, P., & Hudson, S. (2011). Actioning university-community engagement: Leadership, mentoring and professional learning communities. Paper for the Australian Universities Community Engagement Alliance (AUCEA) Conference, Sydney, NSW.

Howe, E. R. (2006). Exemplary teacher induction: An international review. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 287-297.

Von Korff, J., Archibeque, B., Gomez, K. A., Heckendorf, T., McKagan, S. B., Sayre, E. C., Schenk, E. W., Shepherd, C. and Sorell, L. (2016). Secondary analysis of teaching methods in introductory physics: A 50 k-student study, American Journal of Physics. American Association of Physics Teachers, 84(12), pp. 969–974. Doi: 10.1119/1.4964354.

Le Maistre, C., & Paré, A. (2010). Whatever it takes: How beginning teachers learn to survive. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 559-564.

Ngasi. M. A, Dawo, J. I. & Sika, J. (2020). Linking School-based Tangible Non-monetary Incentives for Teachers with Students;’ Academic Performance in Kisumu Sub-county Public Secondary Schools in Kenya. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies vol. 7(2) .

OECD (2018). Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators, retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2021_b35a14e5-en

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means and how to respond, World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourthindustrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/ (Accessed: 10 April 2017).

Scudamore, R. (2013). Engaging home and international students: A guide for new lecturers, Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/rachelscudamorereportfeb2013.pdf (Accessed: 10 April 2017).

Sharp, H. (2006). Examining the consequences of inadequate induction for beginning teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Adelaide.

Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G. and Francis, R. (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice, Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/sharpe_benfield_roberts_francis_0.pdf (Accessed: 10 April 2017).

Sharplin, E., O’Neill, M., & Chapman, A. (2011). Coping strategies for adaptation to new teacher appointments: Intervention for retention. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 136-146.

Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), pp. 87–101. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x.

Talbot, R. M. I., Doughty, L., Nasim, A., Hartley, L., Le, P., Kramer, L. H., Kornreich-Leshem, H. and Boyer, J. (2016). Theoretically Framing a Complex Phenomenon: Student Success in Large Enrollment Active Learning Courses, in 2016 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings. American Association of Physics Teachers, pp. 344–347. doi: 10.1119/perc.2016. pr.081.

Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C. and Schmid, R. F. (2011). What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study, Review of Educational Research, 81(1), pp. 4–28. doi:10.3102/0034654310393361.

Wasonga, C. O., Wanzare, Z. O., & Dawo, J. I. (2015). Mentoring Beginning Teachers: Bridging the Gap Between Pre-Service Training and In-practice Realities. Journal of Education and Leadership vol5(2)Fall.

Yoon, J. S. (2002). Teacher characteristics as predictors of teacher-student relationships: Stress, negative affect, and self-efficacy. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 30(5), 485-493.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i12.4029


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Jane Irene Dawo, James Sika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2022. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).