PROSPECTIVE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ ABILITY TO IDENTIFY MISTAKES RELATED TO ANGLE CONCEPT OF SIXTH GRADE STUDENTS
Abstract
In the present study we try to highlight prospective mathematics teachers’ ability to identify mistakes of sixth grade students related to angle concept. And also an examination of prospective mathematics teachers conceptions of angle. Study was carried out with 30 sixth-grade students and 38 prospective mathematics teachers. Sixth grade students required to define the concept of angle with their own statements and describe what it brought to their minds by writing their responses on a paper. Students written responses were examined by the researchers and students’ mistakes in their definitions were determined. A data collection form that included students’ definitions of angle (correct, partly correct, incorrect) was obtained. Prospective teachers were required to define the concept of angle with their own statements and evaluate whether sixth grade students’ responses were correct by explaining the reasons in written form. The data obtained from written forms of prospective teachers were analysed through the descriptive analysis technique. Candidate's' comments they have made in response to each student are coded. The results of the research show that prospective mathematics teachers didn’t have problems in determining students' definitions of angle as correct, incorrect or partially correct. But they have problems about expressing the students’ failures and to clearly identifying the mistakes in the incorrect definitions of students. Additionally, almost all of the candidates have made only the static definition of the angle concept.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
References
Aydin, E. & Gundoğdu, L. (2016). 6th Grade Elementary Mathematics School Book. Sevgi Yayınları, Ankara.
Barmby, P., Bilsborough, L., Harries, T. & Higgins, S. (2009). Primary Mathematics: Teaching for Understanding. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Biber, C., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). The Mistakes and The Misconceptions of the Eighth Grade Students on the Subject of Angles. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 50-59.
Butuner, S. O. & Filiz, M. (2016). Exploring High-achieving Sixth Grade Students’ Erroneous Answers and Misconceptions on The Angle Concept. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-22.
Clements, D. H. & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420-464). New York: Macmillan.
Clements, D. H. & Burns, B. A. (2000). Students' Development of Strategies for Turn and Angle Measure. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(1), 31-45.
Dane, A. & Baskurt, H. (2012). Primary School The 6th, 7th and 8th Grade Students’ Perceptions and Misconceptions On Point, Line and Plane Concepts. The Journal of Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Education, 31(2), 81-100.
Devichi, C. & Munier, V. (2013). About the concept of angle in elementary school: Misconceptions and teaching sequences. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(1), 1-19.
Erbay, H. E. (2016). An Investigation of The 6th Grade Students’ Concept Knowledge About Angles. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 36, 704-718.
Fisher, K. M., & Lipson, J. I. (1986). Twenty Questions About Student Errors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(9), 783-803.
Gokkurt, B., Sahin, O., Soylu, Y., & Dogan, Y. (2015). Pre-service Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Regarding Student Mistakes on the Subject of Geometric Shapes. Elementary Education Online, 14(1), 55-71.
Ipek A.S., Atasoy E. & Okumus, S. (2010). A Qualitative Research on Perceptions of Elementary Mathematics Teachers Deal with Angle, 9. Matematik Sempozyumu, 20-22 Ekim 2010, ss.45-45, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Keiser, J. M. (2004). Struggles with Developing The Concept of Angle: Comparing Sixth-Grade Students' Discourse to The History of The Angle Concept. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(3), 285-306.
Kilic, H. (2010). The Nature of Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge of Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1096-1100.
Kieran, C. (1986). LOGO and The Notion of Angle Among Fourth and Sixth Grade Children. In L. Burton and C. Hoyles (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, London, pp. 99–104.
Mayberry, J. W. (1983) The van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thought in Undergraduate Preservice Teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14 (1),58-69.
Mitchelmore M. C., & White, A. P. (2000). Development of Angle Concepts by Progressive Abstraction and Generalization, Educational Studies in Mathematics 41, 209–238.
Silfverberg, H., & Joutsenlahti, J. (2014). Prospective Teachers' Conceptions About a Plane Angle and the Context Dependency of the Conceptions. Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Canada, 36(5),185-192.
Tuluk, G. (2015). The Evaluation of the Concept Maps Created by Future Middle School Mathematics Teachers in Regard to the Concept of Angle. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education Vol, 6(2), 323-337.
White, P. & Mitchelmore, M. (2003). Teaching Angles by Abstraction from Physical Activities with concrete materials. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA (pp. 403-410). Honolulu, United States : Curriculum Research and Development Group - University of Hawaii.
Yazgan, G., Argun, Z., & Emre, E. (2009). Teacher Sceneries Related to “Angle Concept”: Turkey case. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 285-290.
Yetkin, E. (2003). Student Difficulties in Learning Elementary Mathematics. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearing house for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education.
Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik.
Yigit, M. (2014). An Examination of Pre-service Secondary Mathematics Teachers' Conceptions of Angles. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 707.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.419
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Cigdem Arslan, Hatice Nur Erbay, Pinar Guner
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
