UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE AND MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT CELL STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS

Bouali Rahma, Zaki Moncef, Agorram Boujemaa, Nadia Benjelloun, Alami Anouar, Maskour Lhoussaine

Abstract


This study aims to assess the level of understanding of biology students and to identify their misconceptions about cell concepts. Participants of the study (n=160) were students enrolled in biology undergraduate level. Data analysis showed that the students had cell-related misconceptions. The misconceptions were found in four basic competencies of the cell concepts. The most common misconceptions (55.68%) among students are those related to the relationship between the structure and function of the nucleus and endoplasmic reticulum. We denote that most of the students have assimilated the concepts related to the chemical constituents of the cell. There are several potential factors that cause the occurrence of misconceptions among the participants in this study, including low retention of knowledge obtained in previous school levels, lack of learning resources, incomprehensible terms, and low interest of biology students in cell concepts.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


cell biology, misconceptions, structure-functions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Hansell, M. H. (1999). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 33(2),84–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655648.

Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in Biology Education and Conceptual Change strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 3(1): 55–64. Retrieved from http://repository.bilkent.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11693/28941/10075113.pdf?sequence=1.

Bennett, J. (1998). Modeling DNA replication. Journal of Biological Education, 60, 457-460.

Bonwell, C. C. and Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom, ASHE Eric Higher Education Report No. 1. George Washington University. Retrieved from. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf.

Chinnici, J. P., Yue, J. W., & Torres, K. M. (2004). Students as "human chromosomes" in role-playing mitosis & meiosis. The American BiologyTeacher,66,35-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451685.

Clément, P. (2007). Introducing the Cell Concept with both Animal and Plant Cells: A Historical and Didactic Approach. Science & Education, 16(3–5): 423–440. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9029-7

Çmer, A. (2012). What Makes Biology Learning Difficult and Effective: Students’ Views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7 (3): 61–73. doi:10.5897/ERR11.205.

Cohen, R., and A. Yarden (2009). Experienced Junior-High-School Teachers’ PCK in Light of a Curriculum Change: ‘The Cell is to be Studied Longitudinally’. Research in Science Education, 39(1): 131–155. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9088-7.

Degermana, M. S. & Tibell, L. A. E. (2012). Learning goals and conceptual difficulties in cell metabolism—an explorative study of university lecturers' views. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(4).447-461.https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20035J.

Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essay; 5(2), 235-247, Retrieved from https://academicjournals.org/article/article1380539915_Dikmenli.pdf.

Dove, J. E. (1998). Students’ alternative conceptions in Earth science: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Res. Pap. Educ. Vol 13, 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152980130205.

Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. Int. J. Sci. Educ; Vol 11,481–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110501

Egan, K. (1972). Structural communication – A new contribution to pedagogy. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800720090203.

Flores, F.; Tovar, M. E.; Gallegos, L. (2003). Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: An integrated view. International Journal of Science Education,25(2),269-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126793.

Garvin-Doxas, K., Klymkowsky, M., and Elrod, S. (2007). Building, using, and maximizing the impact of concept inventories in the biological sciences: report on a National Science Foundation-sponsored conference on the construction of concept inventories in the biological sciences. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 6, 277–282.

https://doi:10.1187/cbe.07-05-0031.

Giordan, A., Girault, F., and Clément, P. (1994). Conceptions and Knowledge Exploration: Course and Contribution Series for Educational Sciences, Peter. Lang, Berne 1994, 319pp.

Kindfield, A. C. H. (1994). Understanding of Biological Processes: Elucidating Students' Models of Meiosis. The American Biology Teacher, 56(6) 367-371. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4449854.

Lazarowitz, R. & Penso, S. (1995). High school students' difficulties in learning biology concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 26 (3),215-223.https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1992.9655276

Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34,200-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655718.

Odom, A. L. (1995). Secondary & College Biology Students' Misconceptions about Diffusion & Osmosis. The American Biology Teacher, Vol. 57, No. 7 (Oct., 1995), pp. 409-415. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450030

Odom, A. L., and Barrow, L. H. (1995). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students’ understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. J. Res. Sci.Teaching32,45–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320106

Öztap, H.; Özay, E. & Öztap, F. (2003).Teaching cell division to secondary school students: an investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655890.

Riemeier, T. & Gropengießer, H. (2008). On the Roots of Difficulties in Learning about Cell Division: Process‐based analysis of students’ conceptual development in teaching experiments. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7): 923–939. doi:10.1080/09500690701294716).

Tekkaya C. (2002). Misconceptions as Barrier to Understanding Biology Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 23 p 259-66. (Retrieved fromhttp://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/971-published.pdf).

Tekkaya, C., Ozkan, O. and Sungur, S. (2001) Concepts of biology perceived as difficult by Turkish high school students. Journal of the Faculty of Education of Hacettepe University, 21,145-150. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hunefd/issue/7817/102689.

Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.

Yusmina Hala et al. (2018). Identification of Misconceptions on Cell Concepts among Biology Teachers by Using CRI Method. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1028 012025. http://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012025.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i10.4494

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Bouali Rahma, Zaki Moncef, Agorram Boujemaa, Nadia Benjelloun, Alami Anouar, Maskour Lhoussaine

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).