Nguyen Thi Thu Hang, Do Thi Bich Nguyet, Tran Thi Bich Lien


Vietnam is in the early stages of implementing the reform of the curriculum and textbooks. Vietnam's general education is changing strongly from content-based teaching to competence-building teaching [1]. That change has been implemented by researchers and teachers in all elements of the teaching process, including testing and evaluation. Evaluation of educational outcomes needs to shift from testing memorization to assessing the ability to apply knowledge to solve practical problems, attaching importance to both assessment of learning outcomes and assessment in the learning process. In this situation, testing and assessment in teaching Science in primary schools are also interesting to many teachers, and assessment of scientific competence in teaching this subject is considered an important factor contributing to improving the quality of Science and the quality of subject teaching in the direction of developing students' ability. The article mentions some theoretical foundations and the actual situation of using Rubric in assessing the scientific competence of students in grades 4 and 5 when teachers teach Science, thereby proposing some measures to improve the effectiveness of assessment in teaching this subject.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter


rubric, assessment, competence, teaching, primary school students, Science subject, Vietnam

Full Text:



Ministry of Education and Training, “General Education Program 2018, Master Program”, 2018.

H. G. Andrade, “Teaching with Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” College Teaching, vol. 53, no. 1, 2005, doi: 10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31.

A. L. Kenworthy and G. A. Hrivnak, “To Rubric or Not to Rubric,” Journal of Management Education, vol. 38, no. 3, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1052562914530103.

H. Andrade, “Self-Assessment through rubrics as student self-assessment tools,” Educational leadership, vol. 65, no. 4, 2008.

P. Thi, H. Hanh, C. Thi, and M. Quyen, “Number 30 June 2020.” [Online]. Available:

J. E. Lee, M. Recker, and M. Yuan, “The validity and instructional value of a rubric for evaluating online course quality: An empirical study,” Online Learning Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.24059/olj.v24i1.1949.

G. Reynders, J. Lantz, S. M. Ruder, C. L. Stanford, and R. S. Cole, “Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses,” Int J STEM Educ, vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5.

B. M. Moskal, “Scoring rubrics: What, when and how?,” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, vol. 7, no. 3, 2001.

R. Bacchus, E. Colvin, E. B. Knight, and L. Ritter, “When rubrics aren’t enough: Exploring exemplars and student rubric co-construction,” Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, vol. 17, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1080/15505170.2019.1627617.

O. Rubric, “Open Rubric Open Rubric,” The Harvard referencing method, vol. 1995, no. November, 2017.

M. Yuan and M. Recker, “Not all rubrics are equal: A review of rubrics for evaluating the quality of open educational resources,” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol. 16, no. 5, 2015, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2389.

G. Janssen, V. Meier, and J. Trace, “Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision,” Assessing Writing, vol. 26, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.002.

J. K. Morton, M. Northcote, P. Kilgour, and W. A. Jackson, “Sharing the construction of assessment rubrics with students: A model for collaborative rubric construction,” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, vol. 18, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.53761/

E. Panadero and M. Romero, “To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy,” Assess Educ, vol. 21, no. 2, 2014, doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872.

H. Andrade, X. Wang, Y. Du, and R. Akawi, “Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing,” Journal of Educational Research, vol. 102, no. 4, 2009, doi: 10.3200/JOER.102.4.287-302.

H. G. Andrade and B. A. Boulay, “Role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write,” Journal of Educational Research, vol. 97, no. 1, 2003, doi: 10.1080/00220670309596625.

“Assessment in education: principles, policy and practice,” Assess Educ, vol. 11, no. 1, 2004, doi: 10.1080/0969594042000209092.

R. Smit, P. Bachmann, V. Blum, T. Birri, and K. Hess, “Effects of a rubric for mathematical reasoning on teaching and learning in primary school,” Instr Sci, vol. 45, no. 5, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11251-017-9416-2.

E. C. Greville, “A Rose by Any Other Name: Grading and Assessment,” Assessment Update, vol. 21, no. 5, 2009.

Ministry of Education and Training, “Dispatch No. 8773/BGDĐT-GDTrH on Guidelines for compiling test questions,” 2010.

N. Thi and T. Tra, 2020, “Research on the theory of building rubric to assess the learning outcomes of Pedagogics of education university students according to competency approach.” Vietnam Science and Education Journal, February 26 issue.

N. Thi, T. Hang, and P. Van Thiet, “Integrated Teaching in Vietnam’s General Education Program-Objectives and Orientation for Primary Schools,” Issue 3 Ser. III, vol. 12, pp. 73–77, doi: 10.9790/7388-1203037377.

Ministry of Education and Training, “General Education Program of Science,” 2018.

C. A. Mertler and C. Campbell, “Measuring Teachers’ Knowledge & Application of Classroom Assessment Concepts: Development of the Assessment Literacy Inventory,” American Educational Research Association, 2005.

A. Taghinezhad and M. Dastpak, “Educational testing and measurement: Classroom application and practice”, Modern Journal of Language teaching Methods, vol. 7, no. 5, 2017.

S. M. Brookhart and A. J. Nitko, “Educational assessment of students,” Hum Mov Sci, vol. 53, no. 1, 2018.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2023 Nguyen Thi Thu Hang, Do Thi Bich Nguyet, Tran Thi Bich Lien

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).