EFFECTS OF TEXT MESSAGING ON THE ACADEMIC WRITING OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS OF A GHANAIAN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

Sarah Takyiwa Mensah, Emmanuel Atuahene, Samuel Nti-Adarkwah

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of text messaging on the academic writing of first-year pre-service teachers of Offinso College of Education. Empirical studies on the use of text messages in specific cultures were reviewed in order to demonstrate how the present study is both similar to and different from previous research. Descriptive survey research design was employed by the researchers to conduct this study. The student population for the study was 350. Quota sampling and simple random sampling techniques aided the researchers to select 50 pre-service teachers for the study. The instruments used were questionnaires, interviews and essay-type tests. The study revealed that the vocabulary items students used in their SMS texting contained numbers, reduction, clipping and shortening, and that the use of these vocabulary items had a negative effect because these items found their way into the academic writing of students. The researchers recommend that college tutors should sensitize the pre-service teachers on the need to avoid SMS language in their academic writings to help them overcome the menace. To curtail everything, they should text using Standard English to avoid being addicted to texting language.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


text message, effects, academic writings, pre-service teachers, Ghanaian

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akanferi, A. A., Aziale, L. K. & Asampana, I. (2014). An empirical study on mobile phone usage among young adults in Ghana: From the viewpoint of university students. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 98– No.5, July 2014.

Baron, S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bauerlein, M. (2010). Literary learning in the hyperdigital age. The Futurist, 44(1), 24.

Bushnell, C., Kemp, N., & Martin, F. H. (2011). Text-messaging practices and links to general spelling skill: A study of Australian children. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 11, 27-38. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ941319.pdf

Chief Examiners report (2018). Accra: The West African Examination (WAEC). Critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Publications

Crystal, D. (2008). Txting, the gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crystal, D. (2010). Entrevista. The Joy of TXT. Young people: how does texting affect their use of language? Interaccoes 16. 9-15.

Dansieh, S. A. (2011). SMS texting and its potential impacts on students' written communication skills. International Journal of English Linguistics. Vol. 1, No. 2; September 2011.

De Jonge, S., & Kemp, N. (2012). Text-message abbreviations and language skills in high school and university students. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(1), 49-68. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01466.x

Drouin, M., & Davis, C. (2009). R u txting? Is the use of text-speak hurting your literacy? Journal of Literacy Research, 41(1), 46-67. doi:10.1080/10862960802695131

Durkin, K., Conti-Ramsden, G., & Walker, A. J. (2011). Txt lang: Texting, textism use and literacy abilities in adolescents with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(1), 49-57. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00397.x

Essoh, N., Odey, V. & Endong F. (2014). Creativity features in SMS texts in French by Anglophone learners and teachers of the FLE. JOLACE: Journal of Language and Cultural Studies, 2(3), 79-95.

Gardiner, B. (2011). Promoting habit formation. Health Psychology Review January 2011.

Hock, H. H., & Joseph, B. D. (2009). Language history, language change, and language relationship: An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics (Vol. 218): Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Institute of Education. (2018). English Language Chief Examiner’s report on 2017/2018 end of semester examinations in Colleges of Education. University of Cape Coast.

Jansen, E. (2010). NetLingo: The internet dictionary. Netlingo Inc. https://www.netlingo.com

Johnson, G. (2012). Comprehension of Standard English text and digital textism during childhood. The International Journal of Language, Culture and Society, 35, 1-6. Retrieved from http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au:80/R?func=dbin-jump-full&local_base=gen01-era02&object_id=190700

Kemp, N. (2010). “Texting versus Txting: Reading and writing text messages, and links with other linguistic skills.” Writing Systems Research, 2 (2010): 53–71

Kemp, N., & Bushnell, C. (2011). Children's text messaging: Abbreviations, input methods and links with literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(1), 18-27. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00400.x

Lenhart, A. (2012). Teens Smartphones and Texting. www.pewinternet.org. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/08/Teens-andFriendships-FINAL2.pdf

Lindley, A. (2008). Transnational connections and education in the Somali context. Journal of East African Studies 2(3):401-414, November 2008.

McCoy, W. (2017). Cellphones and social skills. [Online] Available from: http://smallbusiness.chron.com/cellphones-social-skills-28929.html

Plester, B., & Wood, C. (2009). Exploring relationships between traditional and new media literacies: British preteen texters at school. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1108-1129. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01483.x

Plester, B., Lerkkanen, M., Linjama, L. J., Rasku Puttonen, H., & Littleton, K. (2011). Finnish and UK English pre‐teen children's text message language and its relationship with their literacy skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(1), 37-48. doi:10.1111/j.13652729.2010.00402.x

Plester, B., Wood, C., & Joshi, P. (2009). Exploring the relationship between children's knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy outcomes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 145-161. doi:10.1348/026151008x320507

Plester, B., Wood, C. & Bel, V. (2008). Txt Msg n school literacy: Does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations? Literacy 42 (2008): 137–44.

Powell, D., & Dixon, M. (2011). Does SMS text messaging help or harm adults’ knowledge of standard spelling? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27 (2011): 58–66.

Proysen, S. (2009). The Impact of Text Message on Standard English. Bergen: University of Bergen.

Quan-Haase, A. (2008). Instant messaging on campus: Use and integration in university students' everyday communication, The Information Society, 24:2, 105-115, DOI: 10.1080/01972240701883955

Rosen, L. D., Chang, J., Erwin, L., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2010). The relationship between “textisms” and formal and informal writing among young adults. Communication Research, 37(3), 420-440

Ross, K. (2007). Teachers say text messages r ruining kids' writing skills. American Teacher, 92(3), 4.

Russell, L. (2010). The effects text messaging on English grammar. [Online] Available: http://www.ehow.com/list_5828172_effects-text-messaging-english-rammar.html (April 20, 2010).

Shaw, D. M., Carlson, C., & Waxman, M., (2007). an exploratory investigation into the relationship between text messaging and spelling. New England Reading Association Journal, January 1, 2007.

Sutherland, J. (2002). Cn u txt? Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2002/nov/11/mobilephones2

Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein & Tuija Virtanen (eds), Handbook of the Pragmatics of CMC. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The meta discursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11(3), 667-701. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0b19/7ee7702f4b626e2cf9c3b4c6179862e291c3.pdf.

Tomaszewski, J. (2011). Do texting and “cyber slang” harm students’ writing skills? Education World. Available from: http://www.educationworld.com/a_admin/arcives/texting_impacts_studentwriting.shtml#sthash.qKerRrqz.dpuf

Verheijen, L. (2013) The effects of text messaging and instant messaging on literacy. English Studies, 94:5, 582-602, DOI: 10.1080/0013838X.2013.795737 x

Winzker, K., Southwood, F., & Huddlestone, K. (2009). Investigating the impact of SMS speak on the written work of English first language and English second language high school learners. Per Linguam 25 1–16.

Wood, C., Jackson, E., Hart, L., Plester, B., & Wilde, L. (2011). The effect of text messaging on 9- and 10-year-old children's reading, spelling and phonological processing skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(1), 28 doi:10.1111/j.13652729.2010.00398.x

Wood, C., Kemp, N., & Plester, B. (2016). Text messaging and literacy: The evidence [Kindle DX version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com

Yule, G. (2010). The study of language (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i4.4778

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Sarah Takyiwa Mensah, Emmanuel Atuahene, Samuel Nti-Adarkwah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).