A META-ANALYSIS ON PUBLICATIONS FOR LECTURERS’ PERCEPTION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION FROM 2020-2022

Said Abubakar Sheikh Ahmed

Abstract


In this study, a meta-analysis was conducted on 14 articles published between 2020 and 2022, with the Fisher r-to-z transformed correlation coefficient used as the measure of outcome. A random-effects model was employed, using JAMOVI software, to calculate the average Fisher r-to-z transformed correlation coefficient, and the degree of heterogeneity was evaluated using the restricted maximum-likelihood estimator, Q-test for heterogeneity, and I² statistic. The findings revealed that the average correlation coefficient was positive as moderate effect size (0.3528) of the 14 studie

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

s. The study also provided recommendations for improving meta-analyses.

Keywords


meta-analysis, blended learning, studies, higher education, lecturers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alvarez Jr, A. V. (2020). Learning from the problems and challenges in blended learning: Basis for faculty development and program enhancement. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 112–132.

Ayasrah, S., Alnasraween, M. S., Alshorman, A., & Aljarrah, A. (2022). Attitudes of Teachers and Outstanding Students towards Blended Learning in Light of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Jordan. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 12(1), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.01.26

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Geng, S., Law, K. M. Y., & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0

Greco, T., Zangrillo, A., Biondi-Zoccai, G., & Landoni, G. (2013). Meta-analysis: pitfalls and hints. Heart, Lung and Vessels, 5(4), 219–225. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24364016%0A

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3868184

Hansen, C., Steinmetz, H., & Block, J. (2022). How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide. Management Review Quarterly, 72(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00247-4

Higgins, S. (2018). A Brief History of Meta-analysis. In Improving Learning (Issue March). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139519618.002

Ismayana, D., Mulyono, H., Suryoputro, G., & Komara, C. (2020). An Evaluation of EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Blended Learning. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.11-12-2019.2290808

Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1989). The concept of meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(3), 227–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90052-9

Leon, C. T. (2022). ESL teachers and students’ perceptions toward blended learning during Covid -19 pandemic. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 13(2), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2022.13.02.005

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307

Mulyono, H., Ismayama, D., Liestyana, A. R., & Komara, C. (2007). Efl Teachers ’ Perceptions of Foreign. Teaching English with Technology, 21(1), 60–74.

Namyssova, G., Tussupbekova, G., Helmer, J., Malone, K., Afzal, M., & Jonbekova. D. (2019). Challenges and benefits of blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 2(1), 22–31.

Pham, P.-T., Nguyen, M.-T., Nguyen, T.-H., Nguyen, M.-T., Yen, D. T. H., Ho, T.-Q., Le, K.-A., & Nguyen, D.-B. (2021). Blended Learning in Action: Perception of Teachers and Students on Implementing Plended Learning in Ctu. Multicultural Education, 7(4), 379–385. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4728153

Platonova, R. I., Orekhovskaya, N. A., Dautova, S. B., Martynenko, E. V., Kryukova, N. I., & Demir, S. (2022). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Diversifying Models and Practical Recommendations for Researchers. Frontiers in Education, 7(July), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.957199

Saboowala, R., & Manghirmalani-Mishra, P. (2020). Perception of In-Service Teachers Towards Blended Learning as the New Normal in Teaching-Learning Process Post COVID-19 Pandemic. Research Square (Preprint), 1–16.

Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53(June), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002

Xu, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, B., Liew, J., & Kogut, A. (2022). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of self-regulated learning interventions on academic achievement in online and blended environments in K-12 and higher education. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2151935

Yu, Z. (n.d.). A meta-analysis of effects of blended learning on performance , attitude , achievement , and engagement in different countries. 1–23.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i8.4923

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Said Abubakar Sheikh Ahmed

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).