LANGUAGE AND IDEOLOGIES: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK (BECF) DURING THE TRANSITION FROM 8-4-4 TO THE COMPETENCE-BASED CURRICULUM (CBC) IN KENYA

Chege Samuel Nganga

Abstract


This study utilises a critical analysis approach to investigate the language and discursive strategies employed in the Basic Education Curriculum Framework (BECF) during the transition from the 8-4-4 system to the Competence-Based Curriculum (CBC) in Kenya. The research objectives are twofold: (1) to analyse and interpret the language and discursive strategies utilised in the BECF during the transition period, and (2) to critically examine the underlying ideologies and power relations reflected in the BECF, with a specific focus on its construction of knowledge, values, and educational goals. Through a comprehensive analysis of the language and discursive strategies employed in the BECF, this study aims to uncover the nuances and implications of the transitional period. It examines how language choices and discursive techniques are utilised to shape and convey educational concepts and objectives during this period of curriculum reform. By analysing these linguistic features, the study seeks to provide insights into the broader social and political dimensions embedded within the BECF. By closely analysing the language and discursive strategies, the study aims to identify and deconstruct the ideological perspectives that influence the BECF. This analysis will provide valuable insights into the values and beliefs embedded within the curriculum, shedding light on how knowledge is framed, and educational goals are shaped.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


Basic Education Curriculum Framework, 8-4-4 system, Competence-Based Curriculum, language analysis, discursive strategies, ideologies, power relations, knowledge construction, values, educational goals

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, K. T., & Holloway, J. (2020). Discourse analysis as theory, method, and epistemology in studies of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 35(2), 188-221.

Apple, M. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational policy, 18(1), 12-44.

Banks, J. A. (2015). A curriculum for empowerment, action, and change. In Cultural Diversity and Education (pp. 183-201). Routledge.

Bonvillain, N. (2019). Language, culture, and communication: The meaning of messages. Rowman & Littlefield.

Carter, R. (2011). English Grammar Today with CD-ROM: An AZ of Spoken and Written Grammar. Cambridge University Press.

Fajardo-Dack, T. M. (2016). Teacher Disempowerment in the Education System of Ecuador. World Journal of Education, 6(3), 82-89.

Gouëdard, P., Pont, B., Hyttinen, S., & Huang, P. (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation.

Grant, M. M., Tamim, S., Brown, D. B., Sweeney, J. P., Ferguson, F. K., & Jones, L. B. (2015). Teaching and learning with mobile computing devices: Case study in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 59, 32-45.

KICD. (2017). Basic Education Curriculum Framework. (2017)

Marbach-Ad, G., McAdams, K. C., Benson, S., Briken, V., Cathcart, L., Chase, M., El-Sayed, N. M., Frauwirth, K., Fredericksen, B., & Joseph, S. W. (2010). A model for using a concept inventory as a tool for students' assessment and faculty professional development. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 408-416.

Mullet, D. R. (2018). A general critical discourse analysis framework for educational research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 116-142.

Odhiambo, D. (2012). Task force on the re-alignment of the education sector to the constitution of Kenya 2010: Towards a globally competitive quality education for sustainable development, February 2012. Nairobi: ACTS.

Oliveri, M. E., Mislevy, R. J., & Slomp, D. H. (2021). Principled development of workplace English communication Part 1: A sociocognitive framework.

Redman, P., & Maples, W. (2017). Good essay writing: a social sciences guide. Sage.

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398-405.

Willey-Sthapit, C., Jen, S., Storer, H. L., & Benson, O. G. (2022). Discursive decisions: Signposts to guide the use of critical discourse analysis in social work. Qualitative Social Work, 21(1), 129-146.

Wodak, R. (2011). Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Discursive pragmatics, 8, 50-70.

Ziskin, M. B. (2019). Critical discourse analysis and critical qualitative inquiry: data analysis strategies for enhanced understanding of inference and meaning. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(6), 606-631.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i9.4967

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Chege Samuel Nganga

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2026. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).