INVESTIGATION OF SCIENCE TEACHERS' VIEWS ON KAHOOT, SOCRATIVE, QUIZIZZ AND MY QUIZ APPLICATIONS, WHICH ARE WEB 2.0 BASED ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION TOOLS

Hasan Otlu, Hediye Gülşah Otlu, Derya Sönmez

Abstract


In this study, it is aimed to examine the views of Science teachers about Kahoot, Socrative, Quizizz and My Quiz applications, which are Web 2.0 based assessment-evaluation tools. The study group of the research consists of 5 science teachers working in public schools in Karapınar district of Konya province in the 2022-2023 academic year. The study group was selected by convenience sampling method, which is one of the purposive sampling methods. The phenomenology design, which is one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the research. The data were obtained with a semi-structured interview form. The pilot study of the questions in the interview form was carried out with a total of 3 science students who were outside the study group and volunteered for the interview. After the pilot study, it was checked whether the interview form was clear, understandable and suitable for examining the research problem, and the semi-structured interview form was given its final form. After the semi-structured interview form applied to the study group, the data were evaluated by content analysis and the findings obtained in this context; It is gathered under three main themes as Cognitive Competence, Affective Competence and Technological Competence. Each theme is grouped into sub-themes. Science teachers stated that the Web 2.0-based assessment and evaluation tools Socrative, Kahoot, Quizizz, and My Quiz applications mostly attract attention, contribute to meaningful and permanent learning, and help in collecting motivation. In addition, science teachers stated that they carry out technology-supported education activities using Web 2.0-based activities.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


Web 2.0 based assessment and evaluation tools, qualitative research, content analysis, phenomenology, convenience sampling

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akpınar, B., & Özdaş, F. (2013). Teachers' Views on Value Education in Primary Education: A Qualitative Analysis. Fırat University, Journal of Social Sciences, 23(2), 105-113.

Altiok, S., Yukselturk, E., & Ucgul, M. (2017). Evaluation of a Scientific Activity for Web 2.0 Education: Participant Views. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education. 6(1), 1–8.

Arslan, E. (2022). Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1116878.

Baltaci, A. (2018). A Conceptual Study on Sampling Methods and Sample Volume Problems in Qualitative Research. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 7(1), 231–274.

Baltaci, A. (2019). Qualitative Research Process: How to Conduct a Qualitative Research? Vol, 5(2), 368–388. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.598299.

Büyüköztürk, S., Çakmak, E., K., Akgün, Ö., E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2020). Scientific Research Methods in Education (Ş. Büyüköztürk, E. K. Çakmak, Ö. E. Akgün, Ş. Karadeniz, & F. Demirel, Eds.; Vol. 28). Pegem Academy.

Chien, S. P., & Wu, H. K. (2020). Examining influences of science teachers' practices and beliefs about technology-based assessment on students' performances: A hierarchical linear modeling approach. Computers and Education, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2020.103986.

Calli, S. (2019). The Effect of Mobile Application Supported Instruction on Academic Achievement, Attitude, Motivation and Participation of 5th Grade Students: The Subject of Electricity. Marmara University Institute of Educational Sciences. Master Thesis.

Çelenk, G., & Tatlı, Z. (2022). The Effect of Web 2.0 Supported Assessment and Evaluation Training on Questions Developed by Pre-Service Teachers. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal. 55(2), 421-446. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.1020589.

Eyup, B. (2022). Investigation of Turkish Teachers' Competencies in Using Web 2.0 Tools. Journal of İnönü University Faculty of Education, 23(1), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.952051.

Gündüzalp, C. (2021). The Effect of Online Learning Enriched with Web 2.0 Tools on Students' Metacognitive and Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of Turkish Literature, Culture and Education, 10(3), 1158–1177.

Hava, K., & Sen, E. O. (2021). Determination of Primary School Mathematics Teacher Candidates' Views and Satisfaction Levels about Kahoot Application. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(2), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2021.21.62826-823135.

Karademir, C., A., & Akgul, A. (2019). Teachers' Perception of "Effective Social Studies Teacher": A Qualitative Research. Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(3), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.532411.

Karakus, N., & Er, Z. (2020). Turkish Teacher Candidates' Views on the Use of Web 2.0 Tools. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 177–197. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.837184.

Patton, M., Q. (2014). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (M. Tüm & S., B. Demir, Eds.; Vol. 1). Pegem Academy.

Sen, O. (2020). Investigation of the Effect of Lesson Study Method on Science Education Perceptions and Science Education Practices of Science Teacher Candidates. Bartın University, Graduate School of Education. Master Thesis. Bartin.

Timur, S., Timur, B., Arcagök, S., & Öztürk, G. (2020). Science Teachers' Views on Web 2.0 Tools. Ahi Evran University Kirsehir Education Faculty Journal, 1(21). https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2020.21.01.003.

Turan, S. (2021). Design, Implementation and Evaluation of a Web 2.0 Tool (EDA) for Assessment. Trabzon University, Graduate School of Education. Master Thesis. Trabzon.

Türnüklü, A. (2000). A Qualitative Research Technique That Can Be Used Effectively in Educational Science Research: Interview. Educational Management in Theory and Practice, 24, 543-559.

Ulker, T. (2022). The Effectiveness of Web 2.0 Based Formative Assessment Applied to Science Teacher Candidates in Astronomy Lesson. Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Mathematics and Science.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i9.4975

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Hasan Otlu, Hediye Gülşah Otlu, Derya Sönmez

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2026. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).