STRENGTHENING RESEARCH SUPERVISION IN UNIVERSITIES IN KENYA
Abstract
The vision for university education in Kenya is to provide globally competitive quality research and training. The aim is to produce highly trained researchers who can contribute significantly to the country’s national and economic development. However, several studies show that there are a number of supervision shortfalls in universities in Kenya; and this presents a great concern in the training of research students. The aim of this study therefore was to explore the perspectives of postgraduate students and supervisors on how postgraduate supervision can be strengthened in universities in Kenya. This was a qualitative study located within a social constructivist paradigm. Convenient and purposive sampling was utilised to select 18 participants from three public universities in Kenya. The participants were academic supervisors and postgraduate students doing Masters and Doctoral studies. Data collection was done using unstructured individual interviews with supervisors and focus group discussions with students. The data generated was analysed thematically and Vygotsky’s social-cultural theory was used to make meaning of the findings. The results revealed that supervisors need to be supported through capacity-building programs that shape their knowledge and skills and building physical and online structures that support the supervision process. It also revealed that there is a need to engage students in a comprehensive mentorship program and a constructive student-supervisor relationship. The study recommends that for the achievement of effective postgraduate supervision, there is a need for universities in Kenya to invest in developing the skills and knowledge of supervisors and improve the supervision environment by setting up the necessary support structures. Student–centered programs should also be put in place to enable students’ active participation and positive social interaction between the student and the supervisor.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alam, F., Alam, Q., & Rasul, M. G. (2013). A pilot study on postgraduate supervision. Procedia Engineering, 56, 875-881.
Abdullah, M. N. L. Y., & Evans, T. (2012). The relationships between postgraduate research students’ psychological attributes and their supervisors’ supervision training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 788-793.
Al-Kiyumi, A., & Hammad, W. (2020). Preparing instructional supervisors for educational change: empirical evidence from the Sultanate of Oman. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2158244020935905.
Ahmadi, F., Shamsi, A., & Mohammadi, N. (2020). Using intelligent interaction to manage student–supervisor conflict: A qualitative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 9.
Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (Eds.). (2011). The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities. World Bank Publications.
Amundsen, C., & McAlpine, L. (2009). ‘Learning supervision’: trial by fire. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 331-342.
Askew, C., Dixon, R., McCormick, R., Callaghan, K., Wang, G. Y., & Shulruf, B. (2016). Facilitators and barriers to doctoral supervision: A case study in health sciences. Issues in Educational Research, 26(1), 1-9.
Barasa, P. L., & Omulando, C. (2018). Research and PhD capacities in sub-Saharan Africa: Kenya report.
Blose, S., Msiza, V., & Chiororo, F. (2021). Developing a supervisor identity through experiential learning: Narratives of three novice academics working in a South African University. Journal of Education (University of KwaZulu-Natal), (82), 28-43.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brill, J. L., Balcanoff, K. K., Land, D., Gogarty, M., & Turner, F. (2014). Best practices in doctoral retention: Mentoring. Higher Learning Research Communications, 4(2), 26-37.
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Lincoln: SAGE
Crowhurst, P., & Cornish, L. (2020). Factors in agency development: A supervisory teaching perspective. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 45(9), 24-41.
Cekiso, M., Tshotsho, B., Masha, R., & Saziwa, T. (2019). Supervision experiences of postgraduate research students at one South African higher education institution. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(3), 8-25.
Deuchar, R. (2008). Facilitator, director, or critical friend?: Contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles. Teaching in higher education, 13(4), 489-500.
Ekundayo, H., T., & Ayodele, V., O., (2019) How best to motivate lecturers for better service delivery in Nigerian Universities. Mediterranean journal of social sciences, 10(6), 115-121 Electrical Engineering Education 46 (3): 295–306.
Elliot, D. L., & Kobayashi, S. (2019). How can PhD supervisors play a role in bridging academic cultures?. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(8), 911-929.
Firth, A. & Martens, E. (2008). Transforming supervisors. A critique of post-liberal approaches to research supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(3), 279-289.
Frick, B. L., Brodin, E. M., Albertyn, R. M., Scott-Webber, L., Branch, J., Bartholomew, P., & Nygaard, C. (2014). The doctoral student-supervisor relationship as a negotiated learning space. Learning space design in higher education, 241-262.
Gill, P. & Burnard, P. (2008). The student-supervisor relationship in the PhD/Postgraduate process. British Journal of Nursing, 17(10), 668-671.
Grant, K., Hackney, R., & Edgar, D. (2014). Postgraduate research supervision: An 'agreed' conceptual view of good practice through derived metaphors. International Journal of Postgraduate Studies, 9, 43-60.
Grossman, E. & Crowther, J. (2015). Co-supervision in postgraduate training: Ensuring the right-hand knows what the left hand is doing. South African Journal of Science, 111(11/12), 1-8.
Guerin, C., Walker, R., Aitchison, C., Mattarozzi Laming, M., Chatterjee Padmanabhan, M., & James, B. (2017). Doctoral supervisor development in Australian universities: Preparing research supervisors to teach writing.
Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher education, 35(1), 79-92.
Hamid, N. A. A., Abd Rahman, R., & Hamidin, N. M. (2021). Nurturing a Positive Atmosphere in Supervisor-Supervisee Relationships Throughout Postgraduate Studies. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 3(1), 21-33.
Hardy, S. (2014). Great expectations: the relationship between negotiating student and supervisor expectations at the commencement of the candidature and future conflict.
Hodza, F. (2007). Managing the student-supervisor relationship for successful postgraduate supervision. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(8), 1155-1165.
Houston, D. (2015). Quality in postgraduate research. Quality in Higher Education, 21(1), 1-6.
Ismail, A., Abiddin, N. Z., & Hassan, A. (2011). Improving the Development of Postgraduates' Research and Supervision. International Education Studies, 4(1), 78-89.
Kimani, E. N. (2014). Challenges in Quality Control for Postgraduate Supervision. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 1(9), 63–70
Lee, A., & Murray, R. (2015). Supervising writing: Helping postgraduate students develop as researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 558-570.
Maor, D. (2015). The impact of digital technology on postgraduate supervision. In ASCILITE 2015: Globally connected; Digitally Enabled.
Maor, D., & Currie, J. K. (2017). The use of technology in postgraduate supervision pedagogy in two Australian universities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-15.
Masek, A., & Alias, M. (2020). A Review of Effective Postgraduate Supervision: What Is It and How Can We Achieve It?. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 2493-2500.
Mbogo, R. W., Ndiao, E., Wambua, J. M., Ireri, N. W., & Ngala, F. W. (2020). Supervision challenges and delays in completion of PhD programmes in public and private universities: Experiences of supervisors and graduate students in selected universities in Nairobi, Kenya. European Journal of Education Studies.
McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2009). Identity and agency: Pleasures and collegiality among the challenges of the doctoral journey. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 109-125.
Meilani, Y. F. C. P., Tan, J. D., Murwani, F. D., Bernarto, I., & Sudibjo, N. (2021). Motivating and retaining Generation Z faculty members in private universities. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 11(1), 245-255.
Mukhwana, E., Oure, S., Too, J., & Some, D. K. (2016). State of postgraduate research training in Kenya. Commission for University Education (p. 3). Discussion Paper 02. Nairobi, Kenya.
Mulder, K. F., Ferrer, D., Segalas Coral, J., Kordas, O., Nikiforovich, E., & Pereverza, K. (2015). Motivating students and lecturers for education in sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(3), 385-401.
Naidoo, J. R., & Mthembu, S. (2015). An exploration of the experiences and practices of nurse academics regarding postgraduate research supervision at a South African university. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 7(2), 216-219.
Ngulube, P. (2021). Postgraduate supervision practices in education research and the creation of opportunities for knowledge sharing. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 79(2), 255-272.
Orellana, M. L., Darder, A., Pérez, A., & Salinas, J. (2016). Improving doctoral success by matching PhD students with supervisors. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 87.
O’Meara, K. (2013). Advancing graduate student agency. Higher Education in Higher Education in Review, 10, 1-10.
Olmos-López, P., & Sunderland, J. (2017). Doctoral supervisors’ and supervisees’ responses to co-supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(6), 727-740.
Petrie, K., Lemke, G., Williams, A., Mitchell, B. G., Northcote, M. T., Anderson, M., & de Waal, K. (2015). Professional development of research supervisors: A capacity-building, participatory framework.
Phillips, E., & Johnson, C. (2022). Ebook: How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors 7e. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Rigler Jr, K. L., Bowlin, L. K., Sweat, K., Watts, S., & Throne, R. (2017). Agency, Socialization, and Support: A Critical Review of Doctoral Student Attrition. Online Submission.
Syomwene, A. (2021). Graduate students’ perspectives on challenges encountered in research work in higher education: The Kenya experience. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 27(7)
Sriekaningsih, A., & Setyadi, D. (2015). The effect of competence and motivation and cultural organization towards organizational commitment and performance on state university lecturers in East Kalimantan Indonesia. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(17), 208-220.
Torka, M. (2016). Doctoral supervision as a professional practice. In 12th Biennial Quality in Postgraduate Research (QPR) Conference: Society, Economy & Communities: 21st Century innovation in Doctoral Education (pp. 143-148). QPR Organising Committee.
Turhan, N. S., & Karadag, E. (2019). An Exploratory Study on the PhD Dissertation: PhD Students' Opinions on Their Research Development Process. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(1), 1-10.
Uellendahl, G. E., & Tenenbaum, M. N. (2015). Supervision training, practices, and interests of California site supervisors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 54(4), 274-287.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i11.5071
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Rugut Cornelius Kipleting, Syomwene Ann Kisilu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
