EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS' VIEWS ON TEACHER’S SCRUB

Ali Rıza Erdem, Vildan Gider

Abstract


Teacher's scrub has become an important issue that attracts the attention of education stakeholders. Teacher’s scrub is attributed meanings such as authority, respect, and professionalism. However, these meanings may vary according to stakeholders. It is important to reveal the perspectives of educational stakeholders on teacher’s scrub to shed light on the issue. It is important to understand the different perspectives on teacher’s scrub to establish healthier relationships among educational stakeholders. This study aims to determine the views of educational stakeholders on teacher’s scrub. A case study design was used in this study. The study group consisted of 14 teachers, 6 school administrators, and 6 provincial representatives of education unions working at different education levels in Aydın province. The participants were asked the questions in the semi-structured "interview form about teacher’s scrub" prepared by the researchers and the data obtained were analyzed by content analysis. According to the findings of the study, the views of the participants on teacher’s scrub reveal different perspectives.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


teacher, school principal, education union representative, teacher's scrub, opinion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Başaran, S. T. and Aksu, M. (2007). Anatolian teacher high schools: Advantages, limitations and suggestions for improvement. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 40(1), 157-179.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. and Demirel, F. (2009). Scientific Research Methods (8th edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.

Brown, A. P. (2008). A review of the literature on case study research. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 1(1), 1-13.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Qualitative research and research design according to five approaches. (Edited by Miraç Aydın, Mesut Bütün and Selçuk Beşir Demir). Ankara: Siyasal Bookstore.

Çelikten, M., Şanal, M., & Yeni, Y. (2005). Teaching profession and its characteristics. Erciyes University Social Journal of the Institute of Sciences, 19(2), 207-237.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research. California: Sage Publications.

Hatipoğlu, A., & Kavas, E. (2016). The effect of parent approaches on teacher performance. Human and Social Sciences Journal of Research, 5(4), 1012-1034.

Karaman, M., Acar, A., Kılıç, O., Buluş, U., & Erdoğan, Ö. (2013). Teachers working in Sakarya province 'the status and prestige of the teaching profession'. Sakarya University Publications, 95, 104-110.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, B. G. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publications.

Merriam, S. B. (2013). A guide to qualitative research, design and practice. (Trans. Ed. S. Turan). Nobel Publishing.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Özsoy, G., Özsoy, S., Özkara, Y., & Memiş, A. D. (2010). Preference of prospective teachers for teaching profession factors that are effective in their decision making. İlköğretim Online, 9(3), 910-921.

Öztürk, N. (2005). The role of education in economic development. Socioeconomics, 1(1), 27-44.

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (M. Bütün and S. B. Demir, trans.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Integrating theory and practice. (Fourth Edition). Sage Publications.

Singh, K. (2007). Quantitative social research methods. Sage Publications.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.

Türk, M., & Çelik, O. (2013). Teachers' views on some of the problems they face related to their professions evaluation. VI. Social Sciences Education Congress, Proceedings, (Eds: İ. H. Demircioğlu, R. Çiçek, S. Kaymakçı, E. Demircioğlu & İ. Genç), 76-84.

Yalçın, S. (2016). Investigation of classroom teachers' professional satisfaction/dissatisfaction levels in terms of some variables. Erzincan University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 9(1): 1-16.

Yıldırım, A and Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (8th edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. Sage Publications.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i5.5308

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Ali Rıza Erdem, Vildan Gider

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).