DETERMINING THE STUDENTS’ ATTITUDE TOWARDS RESEARCH: AN EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS

Exequiel R. Gono Jr.

Abstract


This research endeavors to delve into the underlying attitudes of criminology students toward research. An extensive review of theories and literature concerning students' perceived attitudes toward various subjects was conducted to accomplish this objective. Furthermore, data were collected from 50 criminology students to gauge their attitudes towards research. Drawing from this data, a comprehensive set of statement items was formulated to capture the identified attitudes accurately. These items underwent meticulous validation by a panel of experts to ensure their reliability and relevance to the study's objectives. Subsequently, the validated items were administered to a larger sample comprising 245 criminology students. Employing Exploratory Factor Analysis, the study uncovered three primary attitudes toward research: Research Application for Education and Career, Personal Engagement and Development, and Personal Advancement. This systematic approach sheds light on the diverse perspectives of criminology students regarding research. It provides valuable insights for educators to tailor teaching methods effectively to meet students' needs and interests in research.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


attitude, research, criminology students, Philippines

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adebisi, Y. A. (2022). Undergraduate students' involvement in research: values, benefits, barriers and recommendations. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 81, 104384.

Akaranga, S. I., & Makau, B. K. (2016). Ethical considerations and their applications to research: A case of the University of Nairobi. Journal of educational policy and entrepreneurial research, 3(12), 1-9.

Allison, B., Hilton, A., O'Sullivan, T., Owen, A., & Rothwell, A. (2016). Research skills for students. Routledge.

Anwer, M., Iqbal, H. M., & Harrison, C. (2012). Students’ attitude towards science: A case of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 3-9.

Assar, A., Matar, S. G., Hasabo, E. A., Elsayed, S. M., Zaazouee, M. S., Hamdallah, A., ... & Soliman, S. S. (2022). Knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceived barriers towards research in undergraduate medical students of six Arab countries. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 44.

Baba, V. V., & HakemZadeh, F. (2012). Toward a theory of evidence-based decision making. Management decision, 50(5), 832-867.

Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2018). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. In The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 98-122). Routledge.

Bang, M., & Vossoughi, S. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition and instruction, 34(3), 173-193.

Bean, J. C., & Melzer, D. (2021). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public opinion quarterly, 71(2), 287-311.

Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence‐based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational theory, 57(1), 1-22.

Bulterman-Bos, J. (2017). How can a clinical research approach contribute to knowledge-building for the teaching profession?. Educational Action Research, 25(1), 119-127.

Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate behavioral research, 1(2), 245-276.

Carter, S., Liew, S., Brown, G., & Moaveni, A. K. (2018). Barriers to completion of research projects among orthopaedic trainees. Journal of Surgical Education, 75(6), 1630-1634.

Comley-White, N., & Potterton, J. (2018). The perceived barriers and facilitators in completing a Master’s degree in Physiotherapy. South African Journal of Physiotherapy, 74(1), 1-5

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2019). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study.Cunningham, C. M., & Carlsen, W. S. (2014). Teaching engineering practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 197-210.

Dadkhah, M., Lagzian, M., & Santoro, G. (2019). How can health professionals contribute to the Internet of Things body of knowledge: a phenomenography study. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 49(2), 229-240.

Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.

Farooq, M. S., & Shah, S. Z. U. (2008). Students' Attitude Towards Mathematics. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 75-83.

Fleming, R. S. (2024). Contribution to Body of Knowledge. In Preparing for a Successful Faculty Career: Achieving Career Excellence as a Faculty Member (pp. 113-115). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M. T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2018). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 271-298

Fong, C. J., Zaleski, D. J., & Leach, J. K. (2015). The challenge–skill balance and antecedents of flow: A meta-analytic investigation. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 425-446.

Fuentes, J. M., & Gono, E. R. (2023). Factors Characterizing Students Attitude Toward Learning Social Studies: An Exploratory Factor Analysis. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 8(4).

Gagnon, M. P., Légare, F., Labrecque, M., Frémont, P., Cauchon, M., & Desmartis, M. (2007). Perceived barriers to completing an e-learning program on evidence-based medicine. Informatics in primary care, 15(2).

Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in higher education, 53, 229-261.

Gono Jr, E. R., & Pacoy, E. P. (2021). Redefinition of the Parameters of Meaningful Mathematics Learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(13), 6524-6542.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of personality assessment, 68(3), 532-560.

Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2006). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. SAGE publications.

Griffith, J. D., Adams, L. T., Gu, L. L., Hart, C. L., & Nichols-Whitehead, P. (2012). Students’attitudes Toward Statistics Across The Disciplines: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(2), 45-56.

Jr, E. R. G., & Abalos, M. B. Developing a Scale to Measure Student Quality of Life in an Online Learning Set Up in the Pandemic Context.

Hancock, D. R., Algozzine, B., & Lim, J. H. (2021). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers.

Howard, M. C. (2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve?. International journal of human-computer interaction, 32(1), 51-62.

Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science education, 91(1), 36-74.

Hussain, T., Akhter, M., Abid, N., & Sabir, S. (2016). A Study on Attitude towards Research among Technology Education Students in Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and Research, 38(2), 113-122.

Imran, S. S., Nazir, M., Dar, W., Aziz, U., Shoaib, R., Saleem, Q., & Zaman, M. (2019). Attitude towards research among undergraduate and postgraduate medical students. Biomedica, 35(4), 239-243.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.

Kartowagiran, B., & Manaf, A. (2021). Student Attitude and Mathematics Learning Success: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 209-222.

Khalil, I. A. (2023). Mathematics teachers’ attitudes towards integrating ethnic mathematics in teaching mathematical topics: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 1061-1080.

King, S. B., & Williams, F. K. (2014). Barriers to completing the dissertation as perceived by education leadership doctoral students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38(2-3), 275-279.

Kneale, P., Edwards-Jones, A., Walkington, H., & Hill, J. (2016). Evaluating undergraduate research conferences as vehicles for novice researcher development. International Journal for Researcher Development, 7(2), 159-177.

Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., & Melsayanti, R. (2019). Students' Attitude towards Natural Sciences. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 455-460.

Mazana, Y. M., Suero Montero, C., & Olifage, C. R. (2019). Investigating students' attitude towards learning mathematics.

MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84.

McKim, C. A. (2017). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of mixed methods research, 11(2), 202-222.

Moon, J. (2007). Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice. Routledge.

Nolan, J. R., McConville, K. S., Addona, V., Tintle, N. L., & Pearl, D. K. (2020). Mentoring undergraduate research in statistics: reaping the benefits and overcoming the barriers. Journal of Statistics Education, 28(2), 140-153.

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International journal of science education, 25(9), 1049-1079.

Pajares, F. (2012). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 111-139). Routledge.

Papanastasiou, E. C.(2005). Factor structure of the “attitudes toward research” scale, Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 16-26. Available at http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj

Patak, A.A ,Naim, H. A. (2012). ESL/EFL Students Attitude toward Research Report Writing in Higher Education: A Literature Review, Management Educator: Courses, Cases & Teaching Journal, 5 (65), DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2119602.

Pierce, R., Stacey, K., & Barkatsas, A. (2007). A scale for monitoring students’ attitudes to learning mathematics with technology. Computers & Education, 48(2), 285-300.

Raubenheimer, J. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximise scale reliability and validity. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4). Retrieved from http://www.sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/viewArticle/168

Ravitch, S. M., & Riggan, M. (2016). Reason & rigor: How conceptual frameworks guide research. Sage Publications.

Romero, R. S., & Gono Jr, E. R. (2021). Obstacles in Pursuing Business among Entrepreneurship Students.

Rosenthal, M. (2016). Qualitative research methods: Why, when, and how to conduct interviews and focus groups in pharmacy research. Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 8(4), 509-516.

Ruffell, M., Mason, J., & Allen, B. (1998). Studying attitude to mathematics. Educational studies in mathematics, 35(1), 1-18.

Shaukat, S., Siddiquah, A., Abiodullah, M., & Akbar, R. A. (2014). Postgraduate students' attitudes towards research. Bulletin of Education and Research, 36(1), 111-122.

Schildkamp, K. (2019). Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps. Educational research, 61(3), 257-273

Sinaga, R. R. F., & Pustika, R. (2021). Exploring Students’attitude towards English online learning using moodle during COVID-19 pandemic at smk yadika bandarlampung. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 8-15.

Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy: Evidence from four institutional case studies. The journal of higher education, 73(6), 740-763.

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teacher education, 24(1), 80-91

Williams, B., Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 8, 1-13.

Zan, R. & Martino, P. D. (2007). Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy, TMME (The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast) Monograph 3, pp.157-168, ISSN 1551-3440, The Montana Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Zulfikar, T., Dahliana, S., & Sari, R. A. (2019). An Exploration of English Students' Attitude towards English Learning. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(1), 1-12




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i6.5338

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Exequiel R. Gono Jr.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).