STUDENTS’ LEVELS OF AGENTIC ENGAGEMENT IN EXPERIMENTS AND ITS EFFECT ON SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY COMPETENCIES IN TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING INSTITUTIONS IN TANZANIA

Labani Kanyonga, David Kipkasi Kessio, Eugenia J. Kafanabo, Sammy K. Chumba

Abstract


This study aimed to assess students’ levels of agentic engagement in experiments and its effect on scientific inquiry competencies (SICs) in technical education and training institutions in Tanzania. The study employed a quantitative approach and a cross-sectional survey design. A sample of 337 second- and third-year students studying the laboratory science and technology (LST) program from five technical education and training institutions was drawn using a proportionate stratified sampling technique. Data was collected through the use of the student agentic engagement survey questionnaires as well as the SICs test and analyzed through descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation and variance), an independent sample t-test and hierarchical multiple regression analysis. The results revealed that LST students had a similar level of agentic engagement despite their differences in gender (male vs. female), grade levels (second vs. third years), and the nature of the institutions (private vs. public) and overall moderate levels of agentic engagement in experiments. The results further revealed that students’ agentic engagement in experiments had a significant positive effect on SICs when age, gender, nature of technical institutions and grade levels were controlled. Therefore, we concluded that LST students’ gender, grade levels and the nature of the institutions have no effect on students’ levels of agentic engagement. Notably, students demonstrated moderate levels of agentic engagement in scientific experiments, and agentic engagement found to be an important learning factor for promoting SICs. Thus, we recommended that while instructing scientific experiments in the laboratory, instructors be reminded to involve students as agents as often as possible to improve their SICs.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


agentic engagement, scientific inquiry competencies, technical education and training institutions, Tanzania

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arnold, J. C., Mühling, A., & Kremer, K. (2021). Exploring Core Ideas of Procedural Understanding in Scientific Inquiry Using Educational Data Mining. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(1), 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1909552

Aryadoust, V., Ng, L. Y., & Sayama, H. (2021). A comprehensive review of Rasch measurement in language assessment: Recommendations and guidelines for research. Language Testing, 38(1), 6–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220927487

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Person Reliability, Item Reliability, and More. In W. J. Boone, J. R. Staver, & M. S. Yale (Eds.), Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences (pp. 217–234). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4_10

Bordbar, M. (2019). Autonomy-Supportive Faculty and Students’ Agentic Engagement: The Mediating Role of Activating Positive Achievement Emotions. International Journal of Behavioural Science, 13(1), 14–19.

Burch, G. F., Heller, N. A., Burch, J. J., Freed, R., & Steed, S. A. (2015). Student Engagement: Developing a Conceptual Framework and Survey Instrument. Journal of Education for Business, 90(4), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1019821

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/doi:10.1037/h0040957

Delfino, A. P. (2019). Student Engagement and Academic Performance of Students of Partido State University. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(3), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v15i3.05

Dong, Y., & Liu, S. (2020). An Investigation into Students’ Agentic Engagement in Online English Listening Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1103.09

Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M.-T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2018). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21419

Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. T., Schall Linn, J., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009

Freeman, J. L. (2019). Autonomy and Agentic Engagement among First-generation College Students: Exploring Resources for Psychological Need Satisfaction [Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin.

Grant, J. S., & Davis, L. L. (1997). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(3), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3<269: AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (Eighth edition). Cengage.

Jamal, J. J. (2017). Assessment of Students’ Levels of Science Process Skills and the Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Approach as the Main Features of the Current Competence-Based Curriculum in Tanzania [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, The Bergische University of Wuppertal]. http://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/2888

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287

Kambeyo, L. (2018). Assessing Namibian Students’ Abilities in Scientific Reasoning, Scientific Inquiry and Inductive Reasoning Skills [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Szegedi Tudományegyetem]. http://doktori.bibl.u-szeged.hu/9987/

Krell, M., Redman, C., Mathesius, S., Krüger, D., & van Driel, J. (2018). Assessing Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Competencies. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2305–2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9780-1

Lamote, C., Speybroeck, S., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Van Damme, J. (2013). Different pathways towards dropout: The role of engagement in early school leaving. Oxford Review of Education, 39(6), 739–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.854202

Mameli, C., & Passini, S. (2019). Development and Validation of an Enlarged Version of the Student Agentic Engagement Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(4), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918757849

NACTE. (2015). Improving the Labour Market Responsiveness to Technical Training in Tanzania: Professionalising Competence-based Education and Training (CBET) through Enhancing a Professional Dimension. National Council of Technical Education (NACTE).

NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595.

Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H. (2020). How and why students make academic progress: Reconceptualizing the student engagement construct to increase its explanatory power. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101899

Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Tae Ho, Y. (2020). An autonomy-supportive intervention to develop students’ resilience by boosting agentic engagement. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/0165025420911103

Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2022). Agentic Engagement. In A. L. Reschly & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 95–107). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_5

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing Students’ Engagement by Increasing Teachers’ Autonomy Support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f

Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702451

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002

UN. (2019). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019. United Nations (UN).

Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social Support Matters: Longitudinal Effects of Social Support on Three Dimensions of School Engagement from Middle to High School: Social Support. Child Development, 83(3), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x

Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002

Wu, P.-H., Kuo, C.-Y., Wu, H.-K., Jen, T.-H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2018). Learning benefits of secondary school students’ inquiry-related curiosity: A cross-grade comparison of the relationships among learning experiences, curiosity, engagement, and inquiry abilities. Science Education, 102(5), 917–950. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21456

Wulandari, F. E., & Shofiyah, N. (2018). Problem-based learning: Effects on student’s scientific reasoning skills in science. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, (Vol. 1006, No. 1, p. 012029). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012029

Yen, W. M. (1984). Effects of Local Item Dependence on the Fit and Equating Performance of the Three-Parameter Logistic Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168400800201




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i8.5469

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Labani Kanyonga, David Kipkasi Kessio, Eugenia J. Kafanabo, Sammy K. Chumba

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).