A MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL TEACHERS' STANDARDS' IMPACT ON MATHEMATICS TEACHERS' INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES
Abstract
The study examined the impact of the National Teachers’ Standards on the instructional methods of mathematics educators in the Sekyere Central District of the Ashanti Region of Ghana, guided by the Concerns-Based Adoption Model. A cross-sectional research design was adopted. The target population was all basic school teachers in the district, whereas the accessible population was all junior high school mathematics teachers, thus, through the census sampling technique, a sample size of 82 respondents participated in the study. The researchers deployed a closed-ended questionnaire to unravel the impact of the National Teachers’ Standards on instructional methods among mathematics teachers. Reliability coefficients for NTS and instructional practices constructs were 0.92 and 0.85, respectively, indicating strong reliability. Data analysis utilized frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviations, simple linear regression, and Pearson’s correlation. The findings revealed prevalent practices such as question-based learning support and group engagement, with limited emphasis on low-cost materials and gender-responsive pedagogy. Teachers demonstrated a robust understanding of NTS and the curriculum framework, though variability existed. Notably, teachers’ NTS knowledge significantly predicted instructional practices, highlighting its crucial role. Hence, it was recommended, among others, that the Sekyere Central Directorate of Education should invest in the design and delivery of evidence-based, teacher-centered professional development interventions and collaborative learning networks to enhance teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and facilitation skills in alignment with the National Teachers Standards, thereby improving teaching quality, student learning outcomes, and overall educational effectiveness.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adegoke, B. A., & Adu, E. O. (2020). Mathematics Education and Sustainable Development in Africa: The Roles of Stakeholders. In O. Y. Igbokwe-Ibeto & S. F. Akpan (Eds.), Mathematics Education and Sustainable Development (pp. 3–21). Springer International Publishing.
Ananga, E. M. (2021). Examining the instructional practices of mathematics teachers and their alignment with educational standards. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 7(2), 45-56.
Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM, 45(6), 797-810.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). Jossey-Bass.
Blömeke, S., & Delaney, S. (2012). Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries: A review of the state of research. ZDM, 44(3), 223-247.
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robinson, V., & Hiebert, J. (2017). Clarifying the impact of educational research on students’ learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(2), 118-123.
Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380-400.
Civil, M. (2017). Improving mathematics and science teaching and learning: Lessons from research on successful programs. Harvard Education Press.
Correnti, R. (2007). Teacher professional development: What’s the point? Educational Leadership, 64(8), 86-87.
Cross, D. I. (2009). Alignment, cohesion, and change: Examining mathematics teachers’ beliefs structures and their influence on instructional practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(5), 325-346.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Strengthening clinical preparation: The holy grail of teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 547-561.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). In ICME-13 Topical Surveys (pp. 39-49). Springer.
Emmer, E. T., & Sabornie, E. J. (2015). Handbook of classroom management. Routledge.
Evans, L. (2011). The ‘shape’ of teacher professionalism in England: Professional standards, performance management, professional development, and the changes proposed in the 2010 White Paper. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 851-870.
Fitzgerald, S., McNamara, G., & O'Hara, J. (2016). Principals and professional development: the role of principals in supporting a standards-based approach to teacher professional development. Irish Educational Studies, 35(3), 1-16.
Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191-1239). Springer.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
Ghana National Teachers Council. (2018). National Teachers Standards. Accra, Ghana
Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2010). Reshaping teacher and student roles in technology-enriched classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(1), 5-25.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391.
Hallinger, P. (2021). Enhancing teacher professional development: Strategies for success. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 343-361.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Wagner, D., & Cortes, V. (2018). Teachers’ conceptions of mathematics classroom discourse: A comparative study in China and the United States. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(3), 415-429.
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 371–404). Information Age Publishing.
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-404). Information Age Publishing.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
Ingersoll, R., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201-233.
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945-980.
Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Learning from Leadership Project, Wallace Foundation.
Makgato, M., & Seru, B. (2016). Challenges Facing Mathematics Teachers in the Implementation of Curriculum 2005 in Botswana. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 301–306.
McMillan, J. H. &Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Ministry of Education, Ghana. (2013). National Teacher Education Curriculum Framework. Ghana Education Service.
Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of virtual manipulatives on student achievement and mathematics learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 100-120.
Mugenda, O. M. & Mugenda, A. G. (2009); Research methods: quantitative and quantitative approaches, Nairobi Act press.
Opoku-Amankwa, K. (2016). Education Policies and Practice in Ghana: The Role of Leadership and Governance. In O. T. Okwilagwe & J. A. B. Ayee (Eds.), Leadership and Governance in Africa: Developmental and Political Challenges (pp. 75–90). Springer.
Paschal, A. M., & Mkulu, M. (2020). Teacher effectiveness and academic achievement of learners. International Journal of Education, 2(3), 112-125.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. Journal of Education, 196(2), 1-38.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Smith, M. S., Bill, V., & Hughes, E. K. (2009). Thinking through a lesson: Successfully implementing high-level tasks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(3), 132-140.
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313-340.
Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning and Teaching Algebra at Middle School through College Levels: Building Meaning for Symbols and their Manipulation. Taylor & Francis.
Toledo, C., Higgins, S., Holt, D., & Wright, P. (2017). The impact of professional development on teaching: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 1(2), 48-64.
Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519-558.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i9.5493
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Enock Yeng, Samuel Tatsi, Patrick Asamoah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
